Menu Expand

Vertrauen und Verbetrieblichungsneigung von Managern und Betriebsräten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung – Teil 1

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Nienhüser, W., Hoßfeld, H. Vertrauen und Verbetrieblichungsneigung von Managern und Betriebsräten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung – Teil 1. Sozialer Fortschritt, 59(8), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.59.8.219
Nienhüser, Werner and Hoßfeld, Heiko "Vertrauen und Verbetrieblichungsneigung von Managern und Betriebsräten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung – Teil 1" Sozialer Fortschritt 59.8, 2010, 219-225. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.59.8.219
Nienhüser, Werner/Hoßfeld, Heiko (2010): Vertrauen und Verbetrieblichungsneigung von Managern und Betriebsräten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung – Teil 1, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 59, iss. 8, 219-225, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.59.8.219

Format

Vertrauen und Verbetrieblichungsneigung von Managern und Betriebsräten. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung – Teil 1

Nienhüser, Werner | Hoßfeld, Heiko

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 59 (2010), Iss. 8 : pp. 219–225

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Prof. Dr. Werner Nienhüser, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Lehrstuhl für Allg. Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insb. Arbeit, Personal und Organisation, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universitätsstraße 12, 45117 Essen.

Heiko Hoßfeld, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Lehrstuhl für Allg. Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insb. Arbeit, Personal und Organisation, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universitätsstraße 12, 45117 Essen.

Cited By

  1. Company-level pacts for employment in the global crisis 2008/2009: first evidence from representative German establishment-level panel data

    Bellmann, Lutz | Gerner, Hans-Dieter

    The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 23 (2012), Iss. 16 P.3375

    https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.689163 [Citations: 17]
  2. Investment under company-level pacts before and during the Great Recession

    Bellmann, Lutz | Gerner, Hans-Dieter | Hübler, Olaf

    Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 36 (2015), Iss. 3 P.501

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X13511999 [Citations: 4]
  3. The Flip Side of Organized Decentralization: Company‐Level Bargaining in Denmark

    Ilsøe, Anna

    British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 50 (2012), Iss. 4 P.760

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00875.x [Citations: 17]

Abstract

Effects of Trust on the Preference for Decentralized Bargaining. An Empirical Study of Managers and Works Councillors

Critics of the German multi-employer collective bargaining system have demanded changes to this system to increase the amount of bargaining at the plant level. But do the actors at the plant level – human resource managers and works councillors who would be responsible for such negotiations – want such a system and what factors explain any possible differences in the strength of their preferences? This paper analyses the preferences for plant-level bargaining in 1000 companies. The main question is whether the trust relationship between management and works council has an impact on the preferences of these actors. Our hypothesis is that the higher the level of mutual trust, the stronger the preference for plant-level bargaining will be. The results confirm this hypothesis only partially. For managers, trust does not have a statistically significant impact, although trust increases the preference to negotiate with the works council instead of with trade unions. By contrast, for the works councillors we find the expected effects of trust. One explanation for the different results could be that works councils are less powerful than managements. Thus, the social relationship and therefore the trust relationship are much more important for them than they are for management.