Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Frerk, T., Leitner, S. Zur Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Beruf: Quantitative und qualitative Perspektiven. Sozialer Fortschritt, 66(3–4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.66.3-4.267
Frerk, Timm and Leitner, Sigrid "Zur Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Beruf: Quantitative und qualitative Perspektiven" Sozialer Fortschritt 66.3–4, 2017, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.66.3-4.267
Frerk, Timm/Leitner, Sigrid (2017): Zur Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Beruf: Quantitative und qualitative Perspektiven, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 66, iss. 3–4, 267-283, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.66.3-4.267

Format

Zur Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Beruf: Quantitative und qualitative Perspektiven

Frerk, Timm | Leitner, Sigrid

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 66 (2017), Iss. 3–4 : pp. 267–283

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Frerk, Timm, Hochschule Düsseldorf, Fachbereich Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften, Münsterstraße 156, 40476 Düsseldorf

Leitner, Prof. Dr. Sigrid, Technische Hochschule Köln, Fakultät für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Gustav-Heinemann-Ufer 54, 50968 Köln

Cited By

  1. Geht das stärkere Engagement von Frauen in Pflege und Unterstützung auf ihre geringere Arbeitsmarktbeteiligung zurück? Ein Beitrag zur Gleichstellungsdebatte

    Klaus, Daniela | Vogel, Claudia

    Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 70 (2021), Iss. 2 P.53

    https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.70.2.53 [Citations: 2]
  2. Frauen und Männer in der zweiten Lebenshälfte

    Unbezahlte Sorgetätigkeiten von Frauen und Männern im Verlauf der zweiten Lebenshälfte

    Klaus, Daniela | Vogel, Claudia

    2019

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25079-9_6 [Citations: 12]
  3. Long-Term Care in Europe

    Long-Term Care in Germany

    Reinhard, Hans-Joachim

    2018

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70081-6_5 [Citations: 2]

References

  1. Auth, D. /Dierkes, M. /Leiber, S./Leitner, S. (2016): Trotz Pflege kein Vereinbarkeitsproblem? Typische Arrangements und Ressourcen erwerbstätiger pflegender Söhne, in: Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 62(1), S. 79 – 110.  Google Scholar
  2. Bolin, K./Lindgren, B./Lundborg, P. (2008): Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe, in: Journal of Health Economics, 27, S. 718 – 738.  Google Scholar
  3. Börsch-Supan, A./Brandt, M./Hunkler, C./Kneip, T./Korbmacher, J./Malter, F./Schaan, B./Stuck, S./Zuber, S. (2013): Data Resource Profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), in: International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, S. 1 – 10.  Google Scholar
  4. Browne, W. J. (2016): MCMC estimation in MlwiN, v.2.36, Bristol.  Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, K. P./Anderson, D. R. (2002): Model Selection and Inference a Practical Information theoretic Approach, New York.  Google Scholar
  6. Carmichael, F./Charles, S. (2003): The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter? in: Journal of Health Economics, 22, S. 781 – 803.  Google Scholar
  7. Eurobarometer (2007): Health and long term care in the European Union, (Special Eurobarometer no. 283), Brüssel.  Google Scholar
  8. Eurostat (2016): Regional labour market statistics, Luxembourg.  Google Scholar
  9. Hedeker, D. (2008): Multilevel Models for Ordinal and Nominal Variables, in: de Leeuw, J./Meijer E. (Hrsg.), Handbook of Multilevel Analysis, New York, S. 237 – 274.  Google Scholar
  10. Heitmueller, A. (2007): The Chicken or the Egg? Endogenity in labour market participation of informal carers in England, in: Journal of Health Economics, 26, S. 536 – 559.  Google Scholar
  11. Henz, U. (2004): The effects of informal care on paid-work participation in Great Britain: A life-course perspective, in: Aging & Society, 24 (6), S. 851 – 880.  Google Scholar
  12. Hox, J. J. (2010): Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Quantitative Methodology Series, New York /Hove.  Google Scholar
  13. Johnsen, R./LoSasso, A. T. (2002): The Trade-Off between Hours of Paid Employment and Time Assistance to Elderly Parents at Midlife, Washington.  Google Scholar
  14. Keck, W. (2012): Die Vereinbarkeit von häuslicher Pflege und Beruf, Bern.  Google Scholar
  15. Keck, W. (2016): Was kommt nach der Pflege? Die Pflege eines Angehörigen senkt Beschäftigungschancen von Pflegepersonen nachhaltig, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, 65 (5), S. 112 – 119.  Google Scholar
  16. Kotsadam, A. (2011): Does Informal Eldercare Impede Women’s Employment? The European Welfare States, in: Feminist Economics, 17 (2), S. 121 – 144.  Google Scholar
  17. Leitner, S. (2003): Varieties of Familialism. The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective, in: European Societies, 5 (4), S. 353 – 375.  Google Scholar
  18. Lohmann, H./Zagel, H. (2016): Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization, in: Journal of European Social Policy, 26 (1), S. 48 – 65.  Google Scholar
  19. Masuy, A. J. (2009): Effects of Caring for an older person in womens’ lifetime participation, in: Work, Agieng and Society, 29 (5), S. 745 – 763.  Google Scholar
  20. Naldini, M./Pavolini, E./Solera, C. (2016): Female employment and elderly care: the role of care policies and culture in 21 European countries, in: Work, employment and society, 30 (4), S. 1 – 24.  Google Scholar
  21. Nowossadeck, S. /Engstler, H./Klaus, D. (2016): Pflege und Unterstützung durch Angehörige. Report Altersdaten. Heft1 /2016. Berlin: DZA.  Google Scholar
  22. Rasbach, J./Charlton, C./Browne, W. J./Healy, M./Cameron, B. (2016): MlwiN version 2.36, Bristol.  Google Scholar
  23. Saraceno, C. (2010): Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective, in: Journal of European Social Policy, 20 (1), S. 32 – 44.  Google Scholar
  24. Snijder T. A. B /Bosker, R. J. (2012): Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, London.  Google Scholar
  25. Spiegelhalter, D. J./Best, N. G./Carlin, B. P./van der Linde, A. (2002): Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology, 64 (4), S. 583 – 639.  Google Scholar
  26. Spiess, K./Schneider, U. (2003): Interactions between Care-Giving and Paid Work Hours among European Midlife Women, 1994 to 1996, in: Aging and Society, 23, S. 41 – 63.  Google Scholar
  27. StatistischesBundesamt (2015): Pflegestatistik 2013. Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung. Deutschlandergebnisse, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  28. Steenbergen, M. R./Jones, B. S. (2002): Modeling Multilevel Data Structures, in: American Journal of Political Science, 46 (1), S. 218 – 237.  Google Scholar
  29. TNS-Infratest Sozialforschung (2011): Abschlussbericht zur Studie „Wirkungen des Pflege- Weiterentwicklungsgesetzes“, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  30. Ungerson, C. (1997): Social Politics and the Commodification of Care, in: Social Politics, 4 (3), S. 362 – 381.  Google Scholar
  31. Yeandle, S./Wigfield, A./Crompton, R./Denett, J. (2002): Employed carers and familyfriendly employment policies, Bristol.  Google Scholar
  32. Zhang, Z./Charlton, C./Parker, R. M. A./Leckie, G./Browne, W. J. (2015): R2MLwiN v.0.8 – 2, Bristol.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Reconciling Informal Care and Work: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives

This article discusses the issue of reconciliation of care and employment from two different angles: In the first part, effects of care policies on the employment status of previous full-time employed caregivers in 34 European regions are analyzed. Based on quantitative multilevel models, it is shown that rising state transfer payments make it more likely that caregivers leave their job. The second part, which is based on qualitative interviews, focuses employed care giving sons in Germany and reveals the maintenance of work despite care responsibilities. Furthermore, the importance of informal support and defamilising measures for combining care and work are presented. Finally, the value of both perspectives is elaborated.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Timm Frerk / Sigrid Leitner: Zur Vereinbarkeit von Pflege und Beruf: Quantitative und qualitative Perspektiven 1