Menu Expand

The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

de Jong, W. The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland. Sociologus, 65(1), 11-33. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.65.1.11
de Jong, Willemijn "The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland" Sociologus 65.1, , 11-33. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.65.1.11
de Jong, Willemijn: The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland, in: Sociologus, vol. 65, iss. 1, 11-33, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.65.1.11

Format

The ‘Child as Project’ Versus the ‘Child as Gift’: Expert Imaginations of IVF and Kinship in Switzerland

de Jong, Willemijn

Sociologus, Vol. 65 (2015), Iss. 1 : pp. 11–33

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Associate researcher, Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies Institute, ISEK, University of Zurich

Cited By

  1. Anticipatory Regimes in Pregnancy: Cross-Fertilising Reproduction and Parenting Culture Studies

    Ballif, Edmée

    Sociology, Vol. 57 (2023), Iss. 3 P.476

    https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221107492 [Citations: 6]

Abstract

This article addresses how experts imagine family-making with IVF in Switzerland, and how their imaginations reveal the kinship rationale and the political tensions behind it. In 2008 prominent institutional representatives of reproductive medicine, reproductive health, politics and ethics took part in a public panel discussion on ‘modern reproductive medicine’ organised by the Medical Faculty at the 175th anniversary of the University of Zurich. That discussion shows in an exemplary way, how professionals in Switzerland imagine ‘the IVF act’ through bodily substances and biomedical technologies, and how they imagine ‘social technologies’ of family-making and citizenship that are closely related to these notions of conception. It is argued in this article that the debate can be read as the staging of different and contested narratives, in particular of secular and sacred origin stories, that include a concerned conception or embryo tale and that pivot around the good ‘child as gift’ versus the bad ‘child as project’. These globally informed narratives have a strong cultural, political and economic stance, and they are driven by hopes and particularly anxieties about human reproduction, kinship and gender in Switzerland at the beginning of the 21st century.