Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Komlos, J (2019). Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019. Applied Economics Quarterly, 65(3), 209-235. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.65.3.209
Komlos, John (2019). "Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019" Applied Economics Quarterly, vol. 65no. 3, 2019 pp. 209-235. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.65.3.209
Komlos, J (2019). Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019. Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 65 (Issue 3), pp 209-235. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.65.3.209

Format

Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019

Komlos, John

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 65 (2019), Iss. 3 : pp. 209–235

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Komlos, John, University of Munich (Professor Emeritus).

Cited By

  1. The Industrial Reserve Army of Labor: Is It Time to Incorporate the Concept into Current Political Economy?

    Mosk, Carl

    Challenge, Vol. 64 (2021), Iss. 4 P.343

    https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1964793 [Citations: 0]
  2. The updated Okun method for estimation of potential output with alternative measures of labor underutilization

    Fontanari, Claudia | Palumbo, Antonella | Salvatori, Chiara

    Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol. 60 (2022), Iss. P.158

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.11.008 [Citations: 0]
  3. The Actual U.S. Unemployment Rate in 2019 Was Twice the Official Rate, and the Phillips Curve

    Komlos, John

    Challenge, Vol. 64 (2021), Iss. 1 P.51

    https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2020.1863547 [Citations: 2]
  4. Whatever Happened to the ‘Goodwin Pattern’? Profit Squeeze Dynamics in the Modern American Labour Market

    Setterfield, Mark

    Review of Political Economy, Vol. (2021), Iss. P.1

    https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.1921357 [Citations: 1]

References

  1. Abdih, Y. / Danninger, S. (2018): “Understanding U.S. Wage Dynamics,” IMF Working Paper 18, 138.  Google Scholar
  2. Ahn, H. J. / Hamilton, J. D. (2019): “Measuring Labor-Force Participation and the Incidence and Duration of Unemployment,” Finance and Economics Discussion Series, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. Working Paper 2019-035, May 6.  Google Scholar
  3. Akerlof, G. / Main, B. (1989): “An experience-weighted measure of unemployment and unemployment durations,” American Economic Review 71, 1003–1011.  Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, C. / Fothergill, S. (2002): “Hidden Unemployment Among Men: A Case Study,” Regional Studies 36, 811–823.  Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D. N. F. / Blanchflower, D. G. (2018a): “Underemployment in the US and Europe,” NBERWorking Paper No. 24927, August.  Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, J. (2019): “It’s All About the Labor Market,” Conference at the Brookings Institution, What’s (Not) Up with Inflation, Washington, D.C. October 3.  Google Scholar
  7. Blanchflower, D. G. (2019): Not Working: Where Have All the Good Jobs Gone? Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.  Google Scholar
  8. Blanchflower, D. G. / Levin, A. T. (2015): “Labor Market Slack and Monetary Policy,” NBER Working Paper 21094.  Google Scholar
  9. BLS. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Glossary,” https://www.bls.gov/bls/glossary.htm#M accessed July 24 2019.  Google Scholar
  10. BLS. 2019. The Economics Daily, August 7, https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2019/1-point-5-million-people-marginally-attached-to-the-labor-force-in-july-2019-unchanged-over-theyear.htm accessed April 19 2020.  Google Scholar
  11. Bosler, C. / Daly, M. C. / Nechio, F. (2014): “Mixed Signals: Labor Markets and Monetary Policy,” FRBSF Economic Letter 2014–36.  Google Scholar
  12. Brandolini, A. / Viviano, E. (2016): “Behind and beyond the (head count) employment rate,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 179, 657–681.  Google Scholar
  13. Bregger, J. E. / Haugen, S. E. (1995): “BLS introduces new range of alternative unemployment measures,” Monthly Labor Review October, 19–26.  Google Scholar
  14. Buffie, N. (2015): “The Anomaly of U-3: Why the Unemployment Rate is Overstating the Strength of Today’s Labor Market,“ CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2015–24, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).  Google Scholar
  15. Bulow, J. I. / Summers, L. H. (1986): “A Theory of Dual Labor Markets with Application to Industrial Policy, Discrimination and Keynesian Unemployment,“ Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 376–414.  Google Scholar
  16. Cajner, T. / Mawhirter, D. / Nekarda, C J. / Ratner, D. (2014): “Why is Involuntary Part-Time Work Elevated?“ FEDS Notes. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 14. https://doi.org/10.17016/2380-7172.0014.  Google Scholar
  17. Cajner, T. / Radler, T. / Ratner, D. /Vidangos, I. (2017): “Racial Gaps in Labor Market Outcomes in the Last Four Decades and over the Business Cycle,” FEDS Working Paper 2017–071.  Google Scholar
  18. Canon, M. E. / Kudlyak, M./Luo, G. / Reed, M. (2014): “Flows to and from Working Part Time for Economic Reasons and the Labor Market Aggregates During and after the 2007–09 Recession,” FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, 100, 87–111.  Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, A. R. (2019): “Recessions Are Racist (But They Don’t Have to Be),” The Nation, November 25.  Google Scholar
  20. Crain, M./ Sherraden, M. (2014): Working and Living in the Shadow of Economic Fragility, Oxford University Press, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  21. Darity, W. Jr. (2010): “A Direct Route to Full Employment,” The Review of Black Political Economy 37, 179–181.  Google Scholar
  22. Darity, W. Jr. / Hamilton, D. (2012): “Bold Policies for Economic Justice,” The Review of Black Political Economy 39, 79–85.  Google Scholar
  23. Darity, W. Jr. / Hamilton, D. / Stewart, J. (2015): “ATour de Force in Understanding Intergroup Inequality: An Introduction to Stratification Economics,” The Review of Black Political Economy 42, 1–6.  Google Scholar
  24. Darity, W. Jr. / Mason, P. (1998): “Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Color, Codes of Gender,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 63–90.  Google Scholar
  25. Davis, J. (2014): “Stratification economics and identity economics,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 39, 1215–1229.  Google Scholar
  26. Diamond, P. A. (1971): “A Model of Price Adjustment.” Journal of Economic Theory 3, 156–168.  Google Scholar
  27. Diamond, P. A. (1981): “Mobility Costs, Frictional Unemployment, and Efficiency,” Journal of Political Economy 89, 798–813.  Google Scholar
  28. Diamond, P. A. (1982): “Wage Determination and Efficiency in Search Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies 49 217–227.  Google Scholar
  29. Dickens, W. T. / Lang, K. (1988): “The Reemergence of Segmented Labor Market Theory,“ American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 78, 129–134.  Google Scholar
  30. Dooley, D./ Prause, J. (2003): The social costs of underemployment: Inadequate employment as disguised unemployment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).  Google Scholar
  31. EPI: Economic Policy Institute (EPI) (2019): State of Working America Data Library, “Underemployment,” and “Unemployment”.  Google Scholar
  32. Faberman, J. / Mueller, A. / Şahin, A. / Topa, G. (2020): “The Shadow Margins of Labor Market Slack,” NBERWorking Paper 26852.  Google Scholar
  33. Feldstein, M. (2016): “The U.S. Economy is in Good Shape,” The Wall Street Journal, February 21.  Google Scholar
  34. Feng, S. / Hu, Y. (2013): “Misclassification Errors and the Underestimation of the US Unemployment Rate,“ American Economic Review, 103, 1054–1070.  Google Scholar
  35. Feng, S. / Hu, Y. / Sun, J. (2018): “On the robustness of alternative unemployment measures,“ Economics Letters, 166(C), 1–5.  Google Scholar
  36. Fontanari, C. / Palumbo, A. / Salvatori, C. (2020): “Potential Output in Theory and Practice: A Revision and Update of Okun’s Original Method,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 54: 247–266.  Google Scholar
  37. Fontanari, C. / Palumbo, A. / Salvatori, C. (2019): “Is it really ‘Full Employment’? Margins for Expansion in the US Economy in the Middle of 2019,” INETeconomics, September 6.  Google Scholar
  38. FRED: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, various series, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/accessed May 23 2019.  Google Scholar
  39. Friedman, G. (2014): “Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy,” Review of Keynesian Economics 2, 171–188.  Google Scholar
  40. Häring, N. / Niall D. (2012): Economists and the Powerful: Convenient Theories, Distorted Facts, Ample Rewards, Anthem Press, London.  Google Scholar
  41. Holder, M. (2017): African American Men and the Labor Market during the Great Recession (Palgrave Macmillan, London).  Google Scholar
  42. Hornstein, A. / Kudlyak, M. (2019): “Aggregate Labor force Participation and Unemployment and Demographic Trends,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper 2019 – 07, February.  Google Scholar
  43. Hornstein, A. / Kudlyak, M. / Lange, F. (2015): “Measuring Resource Utilization in the Labor Market,” Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 100, 1–21.  Google Scholar
  44. Leonhardt, D. (2018): “We’re Measuring the Economy All Wrong,” The New York Times, September 14.  Google Scholar
  45. McDonald, I. M. / Solow, R. M. (1985): “Wages and Employment in a Segmented Labor Market,“ Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1115–1141.  Google Scholar
  46. Mortensen, D. T. (1970a): “Job Search, the Duration of Unemployment and the Phillips curve,” American Economic Review 60, 847–862.  Google Scholar
  47. Mortensen, D. T. (1970b): “A Theory of Wage and Employment Dynamics,” in E. S. Phelps et al. (eds), The Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, Norton, New York.  Google Scholar
  48. Mortensen, D. / Pissarides, C. (1994): “Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment,“ Review of Economic Studies 61, 397–415.  Google Scholar
  49. Paul, S. (1992): “An illfare approach to the measurement of unemployment,” Applied Economics 24, 739–743.  Google Scholar
  50. Pissarides, C. A. (1976): Labour Market Adjustment: Microeconomic Foundations of Short-Run Neoclassical and Keynesian Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  51. Richardson, D. (2019): “Tolerate Unemployment, but Blame the Unemployed: The Contradictions of NAIRU Policy-Making in Australia,” The Australia Institute, Centre for Future Work, November.  Google Scholar
  52. Richmond, Federal Reserve Bank. (no date): “Hornstein-Kudlyak-Lange Non-Employment Index,” https://www.richmondfed.org/research/national_economy/non_employment_index accessed August 25 2019.  Google Scholar
  53. Rosengren, E. (2014): “Labor Market Slack and Monetary Policy,” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, February 26, https://www.bostonfed.org/news-and-events/press-releases/2014/boston-fed-president-labor-market-quotslackquot-compels-a-patient-approach-to-removing-accommodative-monetary-policy.aspx accessed August 17 2019.  Google Scholar
  54. Smialek, J. / Collins, K. (2019): “How the Fed Lost Its Faith in ‘Full Employment,’” The New York Times, December 12. St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, various series.  Google Scholar
  55. St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, various series.  Google Scholar
  56. Standing, G. (2014): “Understanding the Precariat through Labour and Work,” Development and Change 45, 963–980.  Google Scholar
  57. Stiglitz, J. (2018): “When Shall We Overcome,” Project Syndicate, March 12.  Google Scholar
  58. Tcherneva, P. (2019): “The Federal Job Guarantee: Prevention, Not Just a Cure,” Challenge, The Magazine of Economic Affairs 62, 253–272.  Google Scholar
  59. Temin, P. (2017): The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy, The MIT Press, Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  60. Thies, C. (2017): “Slip and Drift in Labor Statistics Since 2007,” Econ Journal Watch 14, 121–132.  Google Scholar
  61. Unger, R. (2015): “Conclusion: The task of the social innovation movement,” in A. Nicholls / J. Simon / M. Gabriel (eds.), New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, Palgrave-Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK.  Google Scholar
  62. Yellen, J. (2014): “Labor Market Dynamics and Monetary Policy,” Speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Symposium, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 22.  Google Scholar
  63. Yellen, J. (2019): “Former Fed Chair Janet Yellen on why the answer to the inflation puzzle matters,” Remarks at the Hutchins Center on Fiscal & Monetary Policy at Brookings on October 3, https://brook.gs/2IlxqpJ accessed October 5 2019.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract

Janet Yellen, former Chair of the Federal Reserve, intimated that the official unemployment rate (U3) is an inadequate measure of labor market slack when she highlighted the “possibility… that labor market slack is not appropriately measured by the civilian unemployment rate” (2019). Thus, we explore the difference between U3 and a more inclusive estimate of unemployment, U6, in order to understand the extent to which U3 misinforms the public, policy makers, and researchers.We find that the gap varies substantially over the business cycle and especially so for the most vulnerable – minorities, youth, and the less educated. This is because these groups are most likely to work part-time involuntarily the longest after the end of a recession and therefore bear the brunt of the burden of its lingering impact for many years thereafter. For African Americans, for instance, it took 7 years and 4 months longer for the recession of 1990/1991 to end. After the Great Recession the Hispanic gap also remained at an elevated level of 10 percentage points from October 2009 through June 2013. In January 2011 U6 climbed to 47.5% among African American youth and the U6-U3 gap was 18 percentage points and was similarly large among African Americans without a high-school diploma. In other words, not only does U3 mislead but the degree to which it does so varies greatly by ethnic group.

JEL Classifications: J40, J49, J69

Unemployment, U6, African American unemployment, Hispanic unemployment discouraged workers, labor market slack

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
John Komlos: Trends and Cycles in U.S. Labor-Market Slack, 1994–2019 1
Abstract 1
1. Introduction 1
2. The Aggregate U6-U3 Gap 4
3. The Absolute U6-U3 Gap Stratified by Ethnicity 6
4. The U6-U3 Gap Relative to U3, Stratified by Ethnicity 1
5. The U6-U3 Absolute Gap Stratified by Education, Gender, and Age 1
6. Conclusion 1
References 2