Menu Expand

Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship
  4. Vol. 68, Issue 2
  5. pp. 99–124

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Palmer, C., Cyrus, V. Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 68(2), 99-124. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.68.2.99
Palmer, Carolin and Cyrus, Victoria "Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 68.2, , 99-124. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.68.2.99
Palmer, Carolin/Cyrus, Victoria: Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 68, iss. 2, 99-124, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.68.2.99
Format
Download

Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten

Palmer, Carolin | Cyrus, Victoria

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 68 (2020), Iss. 2 : pp. 99–124

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.68.2.99
Language
German
Pages
26

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Palmer, Carolin

  • Carolin Palmer hat in Psychologie (Dr. rer. soc.) sowie in Economics and Business Administration (D.Sc.) promoviert und ist Professorin für Psychologie mit dem Schwerpunkt Personalmanagement an der Hochschule für öffentliche Verwaltung Kehl. Ihre aktuellen Forschungsschwerpunkte sind die psychologischen Konsequenzen von Digitalisierung, psychologische Faktoren des Entrepreneurship sowie Personalpsychologie.
  • Search in Google Scholar

Cyrus, Victoria

  • Victoria Cyrus (M.Sc.) absolvierte ihr Masterstudium der Psychologie an der ­Justus-Liebig-Universität in Gießen. Derzeit arbeitet sie bei Lufthansa im Executive HR Management. Ihr Tätigkeitsschwerpunkt liegt im Bereich Female Leadership.
  • Search in Google Scholar

References

  1. Abukhait, R., Bani-Melhem, S. und Shamsudin, F. M. (2019): Do Employee Resilience, Focus on Opportunity, and Work-Related Curiosity Predict Innovative Work Behaviour? The Mediating Role of Career Adaptability, in: International Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (7), 1–30.  Google Scholar
  2. Akhtar, R., Ahmetoglu, G. und Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013): Greed is good? Assessing the relationship between entrepreneurship and subclinical psychopathy, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (3), 420–425.  Google Scholar
  3. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F. und Mhatre, K. H. (2011): Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance, in: Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22 (2), 127–152.  Google Scholar
  4. Ayala, J.-C. und Manzano, G. (2014): The resilience of the entrepreneur. Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis, in: Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 126–135.  Google Scholar
  5. Back, M., Küfner, A., Dufner, M., Gerlach, T., Rauthmann, J. und Denissen, J. (2013): Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry: Disentangling the Bright and Dark Sides of Narcissism, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105 (6), 1013–1037.  Google Scholar
  6. Begley, T. M. und Boyd, D. P. (1987): Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller businesses, in: Journal of business venturing, 2 (1), 79–93.  Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, M.-J. und Barbosa, S. D. (2016): Resilience and entrepreneurship: A dynamic and biographical approach to the entrepreneurial act, in: M@n@gement, 19 (2), 89–123.  Google Scholar
  8. Bhidé, A. (2003): The Origins and Evolutions of New Businesses, New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  9. Blickle, G., Schütte, N. und Genau, H. A. (2018): Manager psychopathy, trait activation, and job performance: a multi-source study, in: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27 (4), 450–461.  Google Scholar
  10. Boddy, C., Ladyshewsky, R. und Galvin, P. (2010): The Influence of Corporate Psychopaths on Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment to Employees, in: Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 1–19.  Google Scholar
  11. Brandstätter, H. (2011): Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 222–230.  Google Scholar
  12. Bullough, A. und Renko, M. (2013): Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times, in: Business Horizons, 56 (3), 343–350.  Google Scholar
  13. Campbell, K. und Campbell, S. (2009): On the Self-regulatory Dynamics Created by the Peculiar Benefits and Costs of Narcissism: A Contextual Reinforcement Model and Examination of Leadership, in: Self and Identity, 8 (2–3), 214–232.  Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, K., Reeder, G., Sedikides, C. und Elliot, A. (2000): Narcissism and Comparative Self-Enhancement Strategies, in: Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 329–347.  Google Scholar
  15. Campbell-Sills, L. und Stein, M. B. (2007): Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience, in: Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20 (6), 1019–1028.  Google Scholar
  16. Christie, R. und Geis, F. (1970): Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Collins, C. J., Hanges, P. J. und Locke, E. A. (2004): The Relationship of Achievement Motivation to Entrepreneurial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis, in: Human Performance, 17 (1), 95–117.  Google Scholar
  18. Covin, J. G. und Slevin, D. P. (1989): Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments, in: Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1), 75–87.  Google Scholar
  19. Dahling, J., Whitaker, B. und Levy, P. (2009): The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale, in: Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257.  Google Scholar
  20. de Jong, J. und den Hartog, D. (2010): Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour, in: Creativity and Innovation Management, 19 (1), 23–36.  Google Scholar
  21. de Terte, I. und Stephens, C. (2014): Psychological resilience of workers in high-risk occupations, in: Stress Health, 30 (5), 353–355.  Google Scholar
  22. Eisenhardt, K. M. und Brown, S. L. (1998): Time pacing: competing in markets that won’t stand still, in: Harvard Business Review, 76 (2), 59–71.  Google Scholar
  23. Fehr, B. und Paulhus, D. (1992): The construct of Machiavellianism: twenty years later, in: C. Spielberger & J. Butcher (Hrsg.): Advances in personality assessment, Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 77–116.  Google Scholar
  24. Frese, M. (2009): Toward a Psychology of Entrepreneurship. An Action Theory Perspective, in: Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5 (6), 437–496.  Google Scholar
  25. Frese, M. und Gielnik, M. M. (2014): The Psychology of Entrepreneurship, in: Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1 (1), 413–438.  Google Scholar
  26. Furnham, A., Richards, S. C. und Paulhus, D. L. (2013): The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review, in: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7 (3), 199–216.  Google Scholar
  27. Gaddis, B. H. und Foster, J. L. (2015): Meta-Analysis of Dark Side Personality Characteristics and Critical Work Behaviors among Leaders across the Globe, in: Applied Psychology, 64 (1), 25–54.  Google Scholar
  28. Gerber, M., Kalak, N., Lemola, S., Clough, P. J., Perry, J. L. und Puhse, U. (2013): Are adolescents with high mental toughness levels more resilient against stress?, in: Stress and Health, 29 (2), 164–171.  Google Scholar
  29. Gerry, J., Melin, L. und Whittington, R. (2003): Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity based view, in: Journal of Management Studies, 40 (1), 3–22.  Google Scholar
  30. Goncalo, J. A., Flynn, F. J. und Kim, S. H. (2010): Are Two Narcissists Better Than One? The Link Between Narcissism, Perceived Creativity, and Creative Performance, in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (11), 1484–1495.  Google Scholar
  31. Gorgievski, M. J. und Stephan, U. (2016): Advancing the Psychology of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the Psychological Literature and an Introduction, in: Applied Psychology, 65 (3), 437–468.  Google Scholar
  32. Grams, W. und Rogers, R. (1990): Power and Personality: Effects of Machiavellianism, Need for Approval, and Motivation on Use of Influence Tactics, in: The Journal of General Psychology, 117 (1), 71–82.  Google Scholar
  33. Grijalva, E. und Harms, P. D. (2014): Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementary model, in: The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28 (2), 108–127.  Google Scholar
  34. Grijalva, E., Harms, P. D., Newman, D. A., Gaddis, B. H. und Fraley, R. C. (2015): Narcissism and Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Review of Linear and Nonlinear Relationships, in: Personnel Psychology, 68 (1), 1–47.  Google Scholar
  35. Grijalva, E. und Newman, D. A. (2015): Narcissism and Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB): Meta-Analysis and Consideration of Collectivist Culture, Big Five Personality, and Narcissism’s Facet Structure, in: Applied Psychology: An International Review, 64 (1), 93–126.  Google Scholar
  36. Hallak, R., Assaker, G., O’Connor, P. und Lee, C. (2018): Firm performance in the upscale restaurant sector: The effects of resilience, creative self-efficacy, innovation and industry experience, in: Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 229–240.  Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. (2013): Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, New York: The Guilford Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Hmieleski, K. M. und Lerner, D. A. (2016): The Dark Triad and Nascent Entrepreneurship: An Examination of Unproductive versus Productive Entrepreneurial Motives, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 54, 7–32.  Google Scholar
  39. Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn (2020): Gründungen und Unternehmensschließungen 2019, (https://www.ifm-bonn.org/statistiken/gruendungen-und-unternehmensschliessungen/#accordion=0&tab=0), abgerufen am 09.05.2020.  Google Scholar
  40. Janssen, O. (2000): Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour, in: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287–302.  Google Scholar
  41. Jonason, P. K., Kaufman, S. B., Webster, G. D. und Geher, G. (2013): What lies beneath the Dark Triad Dirty Dozen: Varied relations with the Big Five, in: Individual Differences Research, 11, 81–90.  Google Scholar
  42. Jonason, P. K., Wee, S. und Li, N. P. (2015): Competition, autonomy, and prestige: Mechanisms through which the Dark Triad predict job satisfaction, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 112–116.  Google Scholar
  43. Jones, D. und Paulhus, D. (2011): Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex, in: Horowith, L. & Strack, S. (Hrsg.): Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions, New York: Wiley & Sons, 249–269.  Google Scholar
  44. Jones, D. und Paulhus, D. (2014): Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A Brief Measure of Dark Personality Traits, in: Assessment, 21 (1), 28–41.  Google Scholar
  45. Kapoor, H. (2015): The Creative Side of the Dark Triad, in: Creativity Research Journal, 27 (1), 58–67.  Google Scholar
  46. Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E. und Tsukayama, E. (2019): The Light vs. Dark Triad of Personality: Contrasting Two Very Different Profiles of Human Nature, in: Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 467.  Google Scholar
  47. Kets de Vries, M. F. (1985): The dark side of entrepreneurship, in: Harvard business review, 63 (6), 160–167.  Google Scholar
  48. Klotz, A. C. und Neubaum, D. O. (2016): Research on the Dark Side of Personality Traits in Entrepreneurship: Observations from an Organizational Behavior Perspective, in: Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 7–17.  Google Scholar
  49. Kramer, K., Cesinger, B., Schwarzinger, D. und Gelléri, P. (2011, Sep): Investigating Entrepreneur´s Dark Personality: How Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy Relate to Entrepreneurial Intention, Paper präsentiert auf British Academy of Management Conference, Birmingham, UK.  Google Scholar
  50. Kraus, S., Berchtold, J., Palmer, C. und Filser, M. (2017): Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Dark Triad of Executive Personality, in: Journal of Promotion Management, 24 (5), 1–21.  Google Scholar
  51. Kraus, S., Clauss, T., Breier, M., Gast, J., Zardini, A. und Tiberius, V. (2020): The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis, in: International journal of entrepreneurial behavior & research, 26 (5), 1067–1092.  Google Scholar
  52. Küfner, A., Dufner, M. und Back, M. (2015): Das Dreckige Dutzend und die Niederträchtigen Neun. Zwei Kurzskalen zur Erfassung von Narzissmus, Machiavellismus und Psychopathie, in: Diagnostica, 61 (2), 76–91.  Google Scholar
  53. Kumari, P. und Sangwan, V. (2015): A Study on Impact of Resilience Capacity on Job Performance of Executives in the Pharmaceutical Industry, in: International Journal of Management and Social Science Research, 4 (4), 27–34.  Google Scholar
  54. Landay, K., Harms, P. D. und Credé, M. (2019): Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 104 (1), 183–196.  Google Scholar
  55. Lovas, B. und Ghoshal, S. (2000): Strategy as guided evolution, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21 (9), 875–953.  Google Scholar
  56. Lü, W., Wang, Z., Liu, Y. und Zhang, H. (2014): Resilience as a mediator between extraversion, neuroticism and happiness, PA and NA, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 128–133.  Google Scholar
  57. Malesza, M. und Ostaszewski, P. (2016): The utility of the Dark Triad model in the prediction of the self-reported and behavioral risk-taking behaviors among adolescents, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 7–11.  Google Scholar
  58. Markman, G. D. und Baron, R. A. (2003): Person-entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful as entrepreneurs than others, in: Human Resource Management Review, 13 (2), 281–302.  Google Scholar
  59. Markman, G. D., Baron, R. A. und Balkin, D. (2004): Are perseverance and self-efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs´ regretful thinking, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (1), 1–19.  Google Scholar
  60. McClelland, D. C. (1961): The Achieving Society, New York: Van Nostrand.  Google Scholar
  61. Meneghel, I., Salanova, M. und Martinez, I. (2014): Feeling Good Makes us Stronger: How Team Resilience Mediates the Effect of Positive Emotions on Team Performance, in: Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 239–255.  Google Scholar
  62. Miller, D. (1983): The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, in: Management Science, 29, 770–791.  Google Scholar
  63. Miller, D. (2015): A Downside to the Entrepreneurial Personality?, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39 (1), 1–8.  Google Scholar
  64. Mishra, P., Bhatnagar, J., Gupta, R. und Wadsworth, S. M. (2017): How work–family enrichment influence innovative work behavior: Role of psychological capital and supervisory support, in: Journal of Management & Organization, 25 (1), 58–80.  Google Scholar
  65. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C. und McDaniel, M. A. (2012): A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behavior: A Social Exchange Perspective, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (3), 557–579.  Google Scholar
  66. O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A. und White, C. D. (2015): A meta-analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five-factor model of personality, in: Journal of personality, 83, 644–664.  Google Scholar
  67. Onley, M., Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A. und Philip, V. (2013): Survival of the Scheming: A Genetically Informed Link Between the Dark Triad and Mental Toughness, in: Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16 (6), 1–9.  Google Scholar
  68. Ouimet, G. (2010): Dynamics of narcissistic leadership in organizations, in: Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25 (7), 713–726.  Google Scholar
  69. Palmer, C. (2016): Berufsbezogene Kreativitätsdiagnostik. Beschreibung und Messung der personalen Voraussetzungen von Innovationen, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  70. Palmer, C., Cesinger, B., Gelléri, P., Putsch, D. und Winzen, J. (2015): Psychometrical testing of entrepreneurial creativity, in: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7 (2), 194–210.  Google Scholar
  71. Palmer, C., Niemand, T., Stöckmann, C., Kraus, S. und Kailer, N. (2019): The interplay of entrepreneurial orientation and psychological traits in explaining firm performance, in: Journal of Business Research, 94, 183–194.  Google Scholar
  72. Papageorgiou, K., Wong, B. und Clough, P. (2017): Beyond good and evil: Exploring the mediating role of mental toughness on the Dark Triad of personality traits, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 119 (1), 19–23.  Google Scholar
  73. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C. und Krueger, R. F. (2009): Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness, in: Dev Psychopathol, 21 (3), 913–938.  Google Scholar
  74. Paulhus, D. L. und Jones, D. N. (2015): Measures of Dark Personalities, in: Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H. & Matthews, G. (Hrsg.): Personality and Social Psychological Constructs, London: Academic Press, 562–594.  Google Scholar
  75. Paulhus, D. L. und Williams, K. M. (2002): The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, in: Journal of Research in Personality, 36 (6), 556–563.  Google Scholar
  76. Rauthmann, J. F. und Kolar, G. P. (2012): How „dark“ are the Dark Triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy, in: Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (7), 884–889.  Google Scholar
  77. Renko, M., Bullough, A. und Saeed, S. (2016): Entrepreneurship under adverse conditions: Global study of individual resilience and self-efficacy, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 18103.  Google Scholar
  78. Robertson, I. T., Cooper, C. L., Sarkar, M. und Curran, T. (2015): Resilience training in the workplace from 2003 to 2014: A systematic review, in: Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88 (3), 533–562.  Google Scholar
  79. Sabouri, S., Gerber, M., Sadeghi Bahmani, D., Lemola, S., Clough, P. J. und Kalak, N. (2016): Examining Dark Triad traits in relation to mental toughness and physical activity in young adults, in: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatmen, 12, 229–235.  Google Scholar
  80. Santoro, G., Messeni-Petruzzelli, A. und Del Giudice, M. (2020): Searching for resilience: the impact of employee-level and entrepreneur-level resilience on firm performance in small family firms, in: Small Business Economics, 1–17.  Google Scholar
  81. Sarubin, N., Gutt, D., Giegling, I., Bühner, M., Hilbert, S. und Krähnemann, O. (2015): Erste Analyse der psychometrischen Eigenschaften und Struktur der deutschsprachigen 10- und 25-Item Version der Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), in: Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 23, 112–122.  Google Scholar
  82. Schlaegel, C. und Koenig, M. (2014): Determinants of entrepreneurial intent: a meta‐analytic test and integration of competing models, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38 (2), 291–332.  Google Scholar
  83. Schumacher, J., Leppert, K., Gunzelmann, T., Strauß, B. und Brähler, E. (2005): Die Resilienzskala. Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der pschischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal, in: Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, 53, 16–39.  Google Scholar
  84. Schumpeter, J. (1997): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, 9. Aufl., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  85. Shepherd, C. D., Marchisio, G., Morrish, S. C., Deacon, J. H. und Miles, M. P. (2010): Entrepreneurial burnout: exploring antecedents, dimensions and outcomes, in: Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 12 (1), 71–79.  Google Scholar
  86. Smith, M., Wallace, C. und Jordan, P. (2016): When the dark ones become darker: How promotion focus moderates the effects of the dark triad on supervisor performance ratings, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37 (2), 236–254.  Google Scholar
  87. Spurk, D., Keller, A. C. und Hirschi, A. (2016): Do bad guys get ahead or fall behind? Relationships of the dark triad of personality with objective and subjective career success, in: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7 (2), 113–121.  Google Scholar
  88. Stein, M. (2013): When Does Narcissistic Leadership Become Problematic? Dick Fuld at Lehman Brothers, in: Journal of Management Inquiry, 22 (3), 282–293.  Google Scholar
  89. Stephan, U. (2018): Entrepreneurs’ Mental Health and Well-Being: A Review and Research Agenda, in: The Academy of Management Perspectives, 290–322.  Google Scholar
  90. Stewart, W. H. und Roth, P. L. (2001): Risk Propensity Differences Between Entrepreneurs and Managers: A Meta-Analytic Review, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 145–153.  Google Scholar
  91. Stewart Jr., W. H. und Roth, P. L. (2007): A Meta-Analysis of Achievement Motivation Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 45 (4), 401–421.  Google Scholar
  92. Tett, R. P. und Burnett, D. D. (2003): A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (3), 500–517.  Google Scholar
  93. Tubadji, A., Nijkamp, P. und Angelis, V. (2016): Cultural hysteresis, entrepreneurship and economic crisis, in: Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9 (1), 103–136.  Google Scholar
  94. Tugade, M. M. und Fredrickson, B. L. (2004): Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86 (2), 320–333.  Google Scholar
  95. Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D. und Lynam, D. R. (2018): Examining the Effects of Controlling for Shared Variance among the Dark Triad Using Meta-analytic Structural Equation Modelling, in: European Journal of Personality, 32 (1), 46–61.  Google Scholar
  96. Ward, T. B. (2004): Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (2), 173–188.  Google Scholar
  97. West, M. A. und Farr, J. L. (1990): Innovation at work, in: Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 3–13.  Google Scholar
  98. Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A. und Zhao, E. Y. (2017): Organizational Response to Adversity: Fusing Crisis Management and Resilience Research Streams, in: Academy of Management Annals, 11 (2), 733–769.  Google Scholar
  99. Youssef, C. und Luthans, F. (2007): Positive Organizational Behavior in the Workplace, in: Journal of Management, 33 (5), 774–800.  Google Scholar
  100. Zhao, H. und Seibert, S. E. (2006): The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: a meta-analytical review, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (2), 259–271.  Google Scholar
  101. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E. und Lumpkin, G. T. (2010): The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review, in: Journal of Management, 36 (2), 381–404.  Google Scholar
  102. Ziegler, M. (2017): Deutsche Übersetzung der SD3 von Jones und Paulhus, Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Zusammenfassung

Entrepreneure sind die Innovatoren eines Unternehmens. Entsprechend kommt dem Verständnis der Mechanismen hinter innovativem Arbeitsverhalten der Unternehmer eine große Bedeutung zu. Auf Ebene des Entrepreneurs können hier neben kognitiven Einflüssen vor allem Persönlichkeitseigenschaften identifiziert werden. In dieser Studie werden die Zusammenhänge innovativen Arbeitsverhaltens als personale Voraussetzung innovativer Unternehmensführung zur Dunklen Triade der Persönlichkeit (Narzissmus, Machiavellismus, Psychopathie) und psychischer Widerstandsfähigkeit (Resilienz) untersucht und damit ein Beitrag zum Verständnis dunkler wie heller Seiten des Unternehmerprofils geleistet.

Auf Basis einer Stichprobe von 78 Unternehmern wurde Resilienz als signifikanter Prädiktor innovativen Arbeitsverhaltens identifiziert. Darüber hinaus konnte Resilienz als Mediator-Variable bestätigt werden, die den indirekten Einfluss von Narzissmus bzw. Psychopathie auf das innovative Arbeitsverhalten des Unternehmers erklärt. Für Machiavellismus wurde weder ein direkter noch indirekter Effekt auf innovatives Arbeitsverhalten gefunden. Höhere Werte in der Dunklen Triade (insb. Narzissmus und Psychopathie) helfen folglich dem Entrepreneur, auch in unsicheren Umwelten selbstbewusst nach neuartigen Lösungen zu suchen und so das Wachstum seines Unternehmens zu fördern.

Abstract

Entrepreneurs are the innovators of a company. Accordingly, understanding the mechanisms behind innovative work behavior of entrepreneurs is of great importance. At the level of the entrepreneur, personality traits can be identified as significant predictors in addition to cognitive influences. This study examines the connections between innovative work behavior as a personal prerequisite for innovative work behavior and the Dark Triad of personality (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy) and psychological resilience, thus contributing to the understanding of both the dark and bright sides of the entrepreneurial profile.

Based on a sample of 78 entrepreneurs, resilience was identified as a significant predictor of innovative work behavior. Furthermore, resilience was confirmed as a mediator variable that explains the indirect influence of narcissism or psychopathy on the innovative work behavior of the entrepreneur. No direct or indirect effect on innovative work behavior was found for Machiavellianism. Higher values in the Dark Triad (especially narcissism and psychopathy) therefore help the entrepreneur to confidently search for new solutions even in uncertain environments and thus promote the growth of his company.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Carolin Palmer / Victoria Cyrus: Play hard, innovate hard? – Der Einfluss der Dunklen Triade auf Resilienz und innovatives Arbeitsverhalten 1
Zusammenfassung 1
Abstract 2
I. Einleitung und Zielsetzung 2
II. Persönlichkeit in der Entrepreneurship-Forschung 3
1. Die Dunkle Triade der Persönlichkeit 5
a) Narzissmus 6
b) Machiavellismus 6
c) Psychopathie 7
d) Die Dunkle Triade und unternehmerischer Erfolg 7
2. Resilienz 9
III. Das Zusammenspiel von dunkler Persönlichkeit, Resilienz und innovativem Arbeitsverhalten 1
IV. Methode 1
1. Stichprobe 1
2. Messinstrumente 1
3. Vorgehensweise 1
V. Ergebnisse 1
VI. Diskussion 1
1. Limitationen 1
Literatur 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.