Menu Expand



Schmidt, VGutmann, T (2020). National Citizenship and Categorical Inequality. Rechtstheorie, 51(1), 89-97.
Schmidt, Volker H. Gutmann, ThomasSchmidt, Volker H. Gutmann, Thomas (2020). "National Citizenship and Categorical Inequality" Rechtstheorie, vol. 51no. 1, 2020 pp. 89-97.
Schmidt, VGutmann, T (2020). National Citizenship and Categorical Inequality. Rechtstheorie, Vol. 51 (Issue 1), pp 89-97.


National Citizenship and Categorical Inequality

Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives

Schmidt, Volker H. | Gutmann, Thomas

Rechtstheorie, Vol. 51 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 89–97

Additional Information

Article Details


Author Details

Prof. Dr. Volker H. Schmidt, Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, 5 Arts Link, Singapore 117570, Singapore

Prof. Dr. Thomas Gutmann, Chair for Civil Law, Philosophy of Law and Medical Law, Faculty of Law, Centre for Advanced Study in Bioethics, University of Muenster,Universitätsstrasse 14–16, 48143 Münster


  1. Carens, Joseph H. (1987): Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Border, in: The Review of Politics 49/2, pp. 251 – 273.  Google Scholar
  2. Carens, Joseph H. (2013): The Ethics of Immigration, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  3. Gutmann, Thomas (2013): Religion und normative Moderne, in: Ulrich Willems/Helene Basu/Thomas Gutmann/Detlef Pollack/Ulrike Spohn (eds.), Moderne und Religion: Kontroversen um Modernität und Säkularisierung, Bielefeld, Transcript: pp. 447 – 488.  Google Scholar
  4. Gutmann, Thomas (2016): Constitutionalism and the Justification of Norms, in: Diritto e Questioni Pubbliche 16/1, pp. 28 – 38.  Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, Jürgen (2005): Equal Treatment of Cultures and the Limits of Postmodern Liberalism, in: Journal of Political Philosophy 13/1, pp. 1 – 28.  Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, Jürgen (2010): The Concept of Human Dignity and The Realistic Utopia of Human Rights, in: Metaphilosophy 41/4, pp. 464 – 480.  Google Scholar
  7. Hobsbawm, Eric J. (1977): The Age of Capital. 1848 – 1875, London.  Google Scholar
  8. Luhmann, Niklas (2004): Law as a Social System, transl. by K. A. Ziegert, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  9. Miller, David (2016): Strangers in Our Midst. The Political Philosophy of Immigration, Cambridge, MA.  Google Scholar
  10. Parsons, Talcott (1964): Evolutionary universals in society, in: American Sociological Review 29/3, pp. 339 – 357.  Google Scholar
  11. Sassen, Saskia (2007): A Sociology of Globalization, New York, N. Y.  Google Scholar
  12. Schmidt, Volker H. (2013a): Gradual and Categorical Inequalities, in: Saïd Amir Arjomand/Elisa Reis (eds.), Worlds of Difference, London, pp. 252 – 270.  Google Scholar
  13. Schmidt, Volker H. (2013b): Global Modernity, World Society and Global Justice: Preliminary Thoughts, in: Aulis Aarnio/Thomas Hoeren/Stanley L. Paulson/Martin Schulte/Dieter Wyduckel (eds.), Positivität, Normativität und Institutionalität des Rechts, Berlin, pp. 73 – 83.  Google Scholar
  14. Schmidt, Volker H. (2014): Global Modernity. A Conceptual Sketch, Basingstoke.  Google Scholar
  15. Schmidt, Volker H. (2019): The Last Bastion of Categorical Inequality?, in: Social Science History 43, pp. 379 – 385.  Google Scholar
  16. Shachar, Ayelet (2009): The Birthright Lottery. Citizenship and Global Inequality, Cambridge, MA.  Google Scholar
  17. Steiner, Hillel (2001): Hard Borders, Compensation, and Classical Liberalism, in: David Miller/Sohail H. Hashmi (eds.), Boundaries and Justice. Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Princeton, N. J., pp. 79 – 88.  Google Scholar
  18. Woods, Robert/Cadwallader, Martin/Zelinsky, Wilbur (1993): Zelinsky, W. 1971: The hypothesis of the mobility transition, Geographical Review 61, pp. 219 – 49 (Classics in Human Geography Revised), Progress in Human Geography 17, pp. 213 – 219.  Google Scholar
  19. Zelinsky, Wilbur (1971): The hypothesis of the mobility transition, in: Geographical Review 61, pp. 219 – 249.  Google Scholar


Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Volker H. Schmidt and Thomas Gutmann: National Citizenship and Categorical Inequality. Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives 89
Philosophical and Sociological Perspectives 89
I. Philosophical Arguments: Normative Modernity 89
II. Sociological Arguments: Functional Differentiation 92
1. 93
2. 93
3. 95
References 96