Menu Expand

Institutions, Antitrust Effectiveness, and Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Variations

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Ma, T. Institutions, Antitrust Effectiveness, and Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Variations. Applied Economics Quarterly, 58(3), 223-262. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.58.3.223
Ma, Tay-Cheng "Institutions, Antitrust Effectiveness, and Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Variations" Applied Economics Quarterly 58.3, , 223-262. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.58.3.223
Ma, Tay-Cheng: Institutions, Antitrust Effectiveness, and Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Variations, in: Applied Economics Quarterly, vol. 58, iss. 3, 223-262, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.58.3.223

Format

Institutions, Antitrust Effectiveness, and Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Cross-Country Variations

Ma, Tay-Cheng

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 58 (2012), Iss. 3 : pp. 223–262

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Department of Economics, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Abstract

This paper investigates the channels through which institutions may have an effect on market competition. The main result of the investigation is that there is a strong and robust relationship between institutions and market competition: economies with better institutions are much more likely to experience a high intensity of competition. However, once the effect of trade openness is controlled for, the effect of institutions on competition must be mediated through the effective enforcement of competition law. Taking the case of Bulgaria, if it were to improve its antitrust effectiveness from the level at the 25th percentile to the one at the 75th percentile of the distribution, then the maximum increase in market competition that would result is 0.57 percentage points. This implies that trade liberalization does not replace the competition regime, as markets are segmented by more than just trade barriers. The beneficial functioning of competition is not secured spontaneously but must be supported by competition laws.

JEL Classification: L40