Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Sociologus
  3. Vol. 71, Issue 1
  4. pp. 55–72

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Praet, I. The Global Biosphere and Its Metaphysical Underpinnings: Ecumenical Alternatives in Animism and Astrobiology. Sociologus, 71(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.55
Praet, Istvan "The Global Biosphere and Its Metaphysical Underpinnings: Ecumenical Alternatives in Animism and Astrobiology" Sociologus 71.1, , 55-72. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.55
Praet, Istvan: The Global Biosphere and Its Metaphysical Underpinnings: Ecumenical Alternatives in Animism and Astrobiology, in: Sociologus, vol. 71, iss. 1, 55-72, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.55
Format
Download

The Global Biosphere and Its Metaphysical Underpinnings: Ecumenical Alternatives in Animism and Astrobiology

Praet, Istvan

Sociologus, Vol. 71 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 55–72

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.55
Language
English
Pages
18
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 34.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Istvan Praet, University of Roehampton, Whitelands College, Holybourne Avenue, London SW15 4JD, United Kingdom.

References

  1. Arènes, Alexandra, Bruno Latour, and Jérôme Gaillardet. 2018. “Giving Depth to the Surface: An Exercise in the Gaia-Graphy of Critical Zones.” The Anthropocene Review: 1–16.  Google Scholar
  2. Aronowksy, Leah. 2017. “Of Astronauts and Algae. NASA and the Dream of Multispecies Spaceflight.” Environmental Humanities 9 (2): 359–377.  Google Scholar
  3. Aronowksy, Leah. 2018. The Planet as Self-Regulating System: Configuring the Biosphere as an Object of Knowledge, 1940–1990. PhD diss., Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences.  Google Scholar
  4. Bains, William. 2004. “Many Chemistries Could Be Used to Build Living Systems.” Astrobiology 4: 137–167.  Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, Jason W. et al. 2009. “Shoreline Features of Titan Ontario Lacus from Cassini/VIMS Observations.” Icarus 201: 217–225.  Google Scholar
  6. Battaglia, Debbora. 2005. E.T. Culture: Anthropology in Outerspaces. Durham and London: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Boes, Tobias. 2014. “Beyond Whole Earth: Planetary Mediation and the Anthropocene.” Environmental Humanities 5 (1): 155–170.  Google Scholar
  9. Cosgrove, Denis. 1994. “Contested Global Visions: One-World, Whole-Earth, and the Apollo Space Photographs.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 (2): 270–294.  Google Scholar
  10. Coustenis, Athena, and Fred Taylor. 2008. Titan: Exploring and Earth-like World. Singapore: World Scientific.  Google Scholar
  11. Coustenis, Athena, and Michel Blanc. 2012. “Large Habitable Moons. Titan and Europa.” In Frontiers of Astrobiology, edited by Chris Impey, Jonathan Lunine, and José Funes. Cambridge: University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Danowski, Déborah, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2017. The Ends of the World. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.  Google Scholar
  13. DeLoughrey, Elizabeth. 2014. “Satellite Planetarity and the Ends of the Earth.” Public Culture 26 (2 [73]): 257–280.  Google Scholar
  14. Descola, Philippe. 2005. Par-delà nature et culture. Paris: Gallimard.  Google Scholar
  15. Ewart, Elizabeth. 2013. Space and Society in Central Brazil: A Panará Ethnography. London: Bloomsbury Academic.  Google Scholar
  16. Gilmour, Iain, and Mark A. Sephton. 2004. An Introduction to Astrobiology. Cambridge: University Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  18. Haraway, Donna et al. 2016. “Anthropologists Are Talking — About the Anthropocene.” Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology 81 (3): 535–564.  Google Scholar
  19. Helmreich, Stefan. 2006. “The Signature of Life: Designing the Astrobiological Imagination.” Grey Room 23 (4): 66–95.  Google Scholar
  20. Helmreich, Stefan. 2007. “‘Life Is a Verb’: Inflections of Artificial Life in Cultural Context.” Artificial Life 13 (2): 189–201.  Google Scholar
  21. Helmreich, Stefan. 2008. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Helmreich, Stefan. 2011. “What Was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies.” Critical Inquiry 37 (4): 671–696.  Google Scholar
  23. Helmreich, Stefan. 2012. “Extraterrestrial Relativism.” Anthropological Quarterly 85 (4): 1127–1141.  Google Scholar
  24. Helmreich, Stefan. 2015. Sounding the Limits of Life: Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  25. Houdart Sophie, and Christine Jungen. 2015. “Cosmos Connections.” Gradhiva 22 (2015): 4–23.  Google Scholar
  26. Ingold, Tim. 1993. “Globes and Spheres: The Topology of Environmentalism.” In Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, edited by Kay Milton, 29–40. London and New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  27. Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  28. Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  29. Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  30. Ingold, Tim. 2015. The Life of Lines. Abingdon: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  31. James, Wendy. 1979. ’Kwanim Pa. The Making of the Uduk People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  Google Scholar
  32. Jasanoff, Sheila 2001. “Image and Imagination. The Formation of Global Environmental Consciousness.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by P. Edwards and C. Miller, 309–337. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Latour, Bruno. 2015. Face à Gaïa: Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. Paris: La Découverte.  Google Scholar
  34. Lazier, Benjamin. 2011. “Earthrise; Or, the Globalisation of the World Picture.” The American Historical Review 116 (3): 602–630.  Google Scholar
  35. Lekan, Thomas M. 2014. “Fractal Eaarth: Visualising the Global Environment in the Anthropocene.” Environmental Humanities 5 (1): 171–201.  Google Scholar
  36. Lineweaver, Charles H. 2006. “We Have Not Detected Extraterrestrial Life, or Have We?” In Life as We Know It, edited by J. Sekback, 445–457. Dordrecht: Springer.  Google Scholar
  37. Lorcy, Armelle. 2008. “Les péripéties cynégétiques des Noirs d’Équateur. De l’art de rester humain et chrétien tout en chassant.” Journal de la Société des Américanistes 94 (1): 65–97.  Google Scholar
  38. Lorcy, Armelle. 2011. Cuisiner les sensibilités. Alimentation, affects et société (Noirs et Indiens Chachi du littoral équatorien). PhD diss., Paris X – Nanterre.  Google Scholar
  39. Lorenz, Ralph D., and Jacqueline Mitton. 2008. Titan Unveiled. Saturn’s Mysterious Moon Explored. Princeton: University Press.  Google Scholar
  40. McKay, Christopher P., and Heather D. Smith. 2005. “Possibilities for Methanogenic Life in Liquid Methane on the Surface of Titan.” Icarus 178: 274–276.  Google Scholar
  41. Messeri, Lisa. 2016. Placing Outer Space: An Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  42. Morange, Michel. 2009. Explaining Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  43. Olson, Valerie, and Lisa Messeri. 2015. “Beyond the Anthropocene. Un-Earthing an Epoch.” Environment and Society: Advances in Research 6: 28–47.  Google Scholar
  44. Olson, Valerie, and Lisa Messeri. 2018. Into the Extreme. U.S. Environmental Systems and Politics beyond Earth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  Google Scholar
  45. Olwig, Kenneth R. 2011. “The Earth Is Not a Globe: Landscape versus the ‘Globalist’ Agenda.” Landscape Research 36 (4): 401–415.  Google Scholar
  46. Pálsson, Gisli. 2009. “Celestial Bodies: Lucy in the Sky.” Studies in Space Policy 1: 69–81.  Google Scholar
  47. Pálsson, Gisli, and Heather Anne Swanson. 2016. “Down to Earth. Geosocialities and Geopolitics.” Environmental Humanities 8 (2): 149–171.  Google Scholar
  48. Pandya, Vishvajit. 2009. In the Forest: Visual and Material Worlds of Andamanese History. Lanham: University Press of America.  Google Scholar
  49. Pitrou, Perig. 2014. “La vie, un objet pour l’anthropologie? Options méthodologiques et problèmes épistémologiques.” L’Homme 212: 159–190.  Google Scholar
  50. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2014. “Geontologies of the Otherwise.” Available at https://culanth.org/fieldsights/geontologies-of-the-otherwise. Accessed October 25, 2021.  Google Scholar
  51. Praet, Istvan. 2009a. “Shamanism and Ritual in South America: An Inquiry into Amerindian Shape-Shifting.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 15, 737–754.  Google Scholar
  52. Praet, Istvan. 2009b. “Catastrophes and Weddings: A Study of Chachi Shape-Shifting.” Journal de la Société des Américanistes 95 (2): 71–89.  Google Scholar
  53. Praet, Istvan. 2011. “The Chachi and Their Uneasy Relationship with Archaeology.” In The Archaeological Encounter. Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Paolo Fortis and Praet Istvan.  Google Scholar
  54. Praet, Istvan. 2013a. Animism and the Question of Life. New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  55. Praet, Istvan. 2013b. “The Positional Quality of Life and Death: A Theory of Human-Animal Relations in Animism.” Anthrozoös 26 (3): 341–355.  Google Scholar
  56. Praet, Istvan. 2013c. “Humanity and Life as the Perpetual Maintenance of Specific Efforts: A Reappraisal of Animism.” In Biosocial Becomings. Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology, edited by Tim Ingold and Gisli Pálsson, 191–210. Cambridge: University Press.  Google Scholar
  57. Proust, Dominique, and Jean Schneider. 2007. Où sont les autres? A la recherche de la vie dans l’Univers. Paris: Seuil.  Google Scholar
  58. Rival, Laura. 2012. “Animism and the Meaning of Life: Reflections from Amazonia.” In Animism in Rainforest and Tundra: Personhood, Animals, Plants and Things in Contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, edited by Olga Ulturgasheva, Marc Brightman, and Vanessa Grotti, 69–81. Oxford: Berghahn.  Google Scholar
  59. Santos-Granero, Fernando. 2012. “Beinghood and People-Making in Native Amazonia: A Constructional Approach with a Perspectival Coda.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 181–211.  Google Scholar
  60. Seeger, Anthony, Roberto da Matta, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 1979. “A fabricação do corpo na sociedade xinguana.” Boletim do Museo Nacional 32: 2–19.  Google Scholar
  61. Sloterdijk, Peter. 2014. Globes: Spheres II. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  62. Stofan, Ellen et al. 2007. “The Lakes of Titan.” Nature 445: 61–64.  Google Scholar
  63. Straight, Bilinda. 2007. Miracles and Extraordinary Experience in Northern Kenya. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  Google Scholar
  64. Vernadsky, Vladimir I. 1998 [1926]. The Biosphere. New York: Springer.  Google Scholar
  65. Vilaça, Apareçida. 2002. “Making Kin Out of Others in Amazonia.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (2): 347–365.  Google Scholar
  66. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2009. Métaphysiques cannibales. Paris: PUF.  Google Scholar
  67. Yusoff, Kathryn. 2015. “Anthropogenesis: Origins and Endings in the Anthropocene.” Theory, Culture and Society 33 (2): 1–26.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The term biosphere designates the “zone of life” on Earth. Outside this sphere, everything becomes “alien.” In this view of things, which I take to be canonical in the modern West, terrestrial life and biosphere overlap more or less neatly. Yet this idea of an almost perfect convergence is not the only view possible. This study presents two anthropological cases which demonstrate, a contrario, that the modern tendency to envisage the biosphere as “our home environment” or as “our familiar world” is in many ways a historical accident. Other ecumenical possibilities (by which I refer to the ancient Greek notion of the “inhabited world,” the oikumene) are by no means unthinkable. Examining the ecumenical originality of two communities that at first sight seem unrelated – Chachi indigenous people in Ecuador and scientists involved in the search for extraterrestrial life – will allow us to cast new light on the metaphysical underpinnings of the modern biosphere concept.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Istvan Praet: The Global Biosphere and Its Metaphysical Underpinnings: Ecumenical Alternatives in Animism and Astrobiology 1
Abstract 1
1. Introduction 1
2. Chachi Animism 4
3. Astrobiology and Saturn’s moon, Titan 9
4. Conclusion 1
References 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.