Menu Expand

Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move

  1. Journals
  2. Sociologus
  3. Vol. 71, Issue 1
  4. pp. 33–54

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Mader, E. Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move. Sociologus, 71(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.33
Mader, Elke "Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move" Sociologus 71.1, , 33-54. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.33
Mader, Elke: Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move, in: Sociologus, vol. 71, iss. 1, 33-54, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.33
Format
Download

Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move

Mader, Elke

Sociologus, Vol. 71 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 33–54

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.33
Language
English
Pages
21
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 34.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Elke Mader †.

Cited By

  1. Obituary. Elke Mader (1954–2021)

    Halbmayer, Ernst

    Sociologus, Vol. 71 (2021), Iss. 2 P.191

    https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.2.191 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Barrueco, Domingo P. 2007. La Fiesta del Uwi. Crónicas, tradiciones y entrevistas. Quito: Abya Yala.  Google Scholar
  2. Bloch, Maurice. 1998. “Why Trees, Too, Are Good to Think With: Towards an Anthropology of the Meaning of Life.” In The Social Life of Trees: Anthropological Perspectives on Tree Symbolism, edited by Laura Rival, 39–55. Oxford/New York: Berg.  Google Scholar
  3. Broseghini, Silvio. 1976a. “Universo Espiritual de los Shuar.” In La Iglesia Shuar. Nueva Presencia y Nuevo Lenguaje, edited by Silvio Broseghini and José Arnalot, 4–15. Sucúa: Mundo Shuar. Serie B/7.  Google Scholar
  4. Broseghini, Silvio. 1976b. “La celebración de la chonta.” In La Iglesia Shuar. Nueva Presencia y Nuevo Lenguaje, edited by Silvio Broseghini and José Arnalot, 15–28. Sucúa: Mundo Shuar. Serie B/7.  Google Scholar
  5. Brown, Michael F. 1986. Tsewa’s Gift. Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.  Google Scholar
  6. Buitrón Arias, Natalia. 2016. “The Attraction of Unity: Power, Knowledge, and Community among the Shuar of Ecuadorian Amazonia.” PhD diss., London School of Economics.  Google Scholar
  7. Corr, Rachel. 2010. Ritual and Remembrance in the Ecuadorian Andes. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Costa, Luiz, and Carlos Fausto. 2010. “The Return of the Animists: Recent Studies in Amazonian Ontologies.” Religion and Society: Advances in Research 1 (1): 89–109.  Google Scholar
  9. De la Cadena, Marisol. 2010. “Indigenous Cosmopolitics in the Andes: Conceptual Reflections beyond ‘Politics’.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (2): 334–370.  Google Scholar
  10. Descola, Philippe. 1992. “Societies of Nature and the Nature of Society.” In Conceptualizing Society, edited by Adam Kuper, 107–126. London/New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  11. Descola, Philippe. 1996. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Urbana Champaign: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Fausto, Carlos. 2012. “Too Many Owners: Mastery and Ownership in Amazonia.” In Animism in Rainforest and Tundra: Personhood, Animals, Plants and Things in Contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, edited by Marc Brightman, Vanessa Elisa Grotti, and Olga Ulturgasheva, 29–47. Oxford: Berghahn Books.  Google Scholar
  14. Gilbert, Helen, and Charlotte Gleghorn. 2014. “Introduction.” In Recasting Commodity and Spectacle in the Indigenous Americas, edited by Helen Gilbert and Charlotte Gleghorn, 1–18. London: Ilas.  Google Scholar
  15. Guss, David M. 2000. The Festive State. Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism as Cultural Performance. Berkeley: University of California Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Halbmayer, Ernst. 2012. “Amerindian Mereology: Animism, Analogy, and the Multiverse.” Indiana 29: 103–125.  Google Scholar
  17. Halbmayer, Ernst. 2016. “Weaving the World and the Origins of Life as We Know It. Notions of Growth, Fabrication and Reproduction in Yukpa Origin Myths.” Revista de Antropologia 59 (1): 145–177.  Google Scholar
  18. Hannerz, Ulf. 1992. Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning. New York: Columbia University Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Harner, Michael. 1972. The Jivaro: People of the Sacred Waterfalls. London: Robert Hale Company.  Google Scholar
  20. Harth, Dietrich and Axel Michaels. 2013. “Ritualdynamik.” In Ritual und Ritualdynamik. Schlüsselbegriffe, Theorien, Diskussionen, edited by Christiane Brosius, Axel Michaels, and Paula Schrode, 123–128. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.  Google Scholar
  21. Holbraad, Martin, Morten Axel Pedersen, and Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. 2014. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Available at: >https://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions> (Accessed July 1, 2019).  Google Scholar
  22. Huarcaya, Sergio Miguel. 2015. “Performativity, Performance, and Indigenous Activism in Ecuador and the Andes.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 57 (3): 806–837.  Google Scholar
  23. Ingold, Tim. 2006. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-Animating Thought.” Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 71 (1): 9–20.  Google Scholar
  24. Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive. Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London & New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  25. Jensen, Adolf Ellegard. 1963. Myth and Cult among Primitive Peoples. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Juncosa Blasco, José Enrique. 1999. Etnografía de la comunicación verbal shuar. Quito: Abya Yala.  Google Scholar
  27. Juncosa Blasco, José Enrique. 2017. Saber para Prevalecer Civilización, Educación y Evangelización en el Territorio Shuar. Educaciones, Epistemologías y Métodos en Disputa. Quito: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.  Google Scholar
  28. Karsten, Rafael. 1922. “The Religion of the Jibaro Indians of Eastern Ecuador.” Boletín de la Academia National de Historia 4 (10/11).  Google Scholar
  29. Karsten, Rafael. 2000 [1935]. La Vida y la Cultura de los Shuar. Quito, Abya Yala.  Google Scholar
  30. Kohn, Eduardo. 2015. Anthropology of Ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 311–327.  Google Scholar
  31. Krainer, Anita, and Martha Elizabeth Guerra Bustillos, eds. 2012. Interculturalidad: Un acercamiento desde la investigación. Quito: Flacso.  Google Scholar
  32. Kukush Tsamaraint, Puencher Julio. 2013. “Las fiestas y mitos de la nacionalidad Shuar en la comunidad de Shaim – namper nuya aujmatsamu shuarna irutkamu shaiminiam.” BA thesis, Universidad de Cuenca.  Google Scholar
  33. León Calle, Stephanie. 2011. “Árboles, simbolismo, cultura, memoria e identidad. Representaciones en el paisaje arbóreo de Gualaquiza.” MA thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar.  Google Scholar
  34. Mader, Elke. 1999. Metamorfosis del poder. Persona, mito y visión en la sociedad Shuar y Achuar (Ecuador/Peru). Quito: Abya Yala.  Google Scholar
  35. Mader, Elke. 2010. “The Art of Giving Birth. Female Mythscape and Generativity among the Shuar.” Lecture at the SALSA Conference, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  36. Mader, Elke. 2018. “Shamanic Modernities and Ritual Dynamics among the Shuar.” In Indigenous Modernities in South America, edited by Ernst Halbmayer, 29–54. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston Publishing.  Google Scholar
  37. Mader, Elke. 2019. “Rund um die Palme. Rituelle Prozesse, indigene Politik und Medien in Ecuador.” In Ritualisierung – Mediatisierung – Performance, edited by Martin Luger, Franz Graf, and Philipp Budka, 111–136. Wien: V&R Unipress/Vienna University Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Mader, Elke, and Richard Gippelhauser. 2000. “Power and Kinship in Shuar and Achuar Society.” In The Dividends of Kinship, edited by Peter P. Schweitzer, 61–91. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  39. Meiser, Anna. 2006. “Iikmak, das ‘Schwein Gottes’ – Zum Selbstverständnis der Shuar heute und die Einwirkung von Mission.” Master thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.  Google Scholar
  40. Meiser, Anna. 2011. “‘Jesus Is the Same Arutam.’ Logics of Appropriation among Missionized Indians and Indigenized Missionaries.” Anthropos 106: 493–510.  Google Scholar
  41. Meiser, Anna. 2018. “Christian Indigenous Identities and Alter-Native Modernities in the Upper Amazon.” In Indigenous Modernities in South America, edited by Ernst Halbmayer, 103–130. Canon Pyon: Sean Kingston Publishing.  Google Scholar
  42. Naikiai, Verónica. 1987. “El uso del Ecosistema en el Antiguo Pueblo Shuar.” Hombre y Ambiente 1 (1): 7–40.  Google Scholar
  43. Pellizzaro, Siro M. 1978. Celebración de Uwi. Quito & Guayaquil: Museos del Banco Central del Ecuador.  Google Scholar
  44. Pellizzaro, Siro M. 1983. Celebración de la vida y de la fecundidad: Uwí. Mundo Shuar, Vol. 11.  Google Scholar
  45. Pitrou, Perig. 2015. “Life as a Process of Making in Mixe Highlands (Oaxaca, Mexico): Towards a ‘General Pragmatics’ of Life.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21 (1): 86–105.  Google Scholar
  46. Reinoso Avecillas, Rodrigo Lucio. 2010. “Conflicto Educativo entre Misioneros Salesianos y Shuar en la Provincia de Morona Santiago.” Master thesis, Facultad Latinoamericana De Ciencias Sociales, Ecuador.  Google Scholar
  47. Rival, Laura. 1998. “Trees – From Symbols of Life and Regeneration to Political Artefacts.” In The Social Life of Trees. Anthropological Perspectives on Tree Symbolism, edited by Laura Rival, 1–36. Oxford: Berg.  Google Scholar
  48. Rival, Laura. 2005. “The Growth of Family Trees: Understanding Huaorani Perceptions of the Forest.” In The Land within – Indigenous Territory and Perception of the Environment, edited by Alexandre Surrallés and Pedro García Hierro, 90–109. Copenhague: IWGIA and Transaction Publisher.  Google Scholar
  49. Rival, Laura. 2012. “Animism and the Meaning of Life: Reflections from Amazonia.” In Animism in Rainforest and Tundra: Personhood, Animals, Plants and Things in Contemporary Amazonia and Siberia, edited by Marc Brightman, Vanessa Elisa Grotti, and Olga Ulturgasheva, 69–81. Oxford: Berghahn.  Google Scholar
  50. Rubenstein, Steven. 2001. “Colonialism, the Shuar Federation, and the Ecuadorian State.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19: 263–293.  Google Scholar
  51. Rubenstein, Steven. 2002. Alejandro Tsakimp. A Shuar Healer in the Margins of History. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.  Google Scholar
  52. Rubenstein, Steven. 2005. “La conversión de los shuar.” Íconos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 22: 27–48.  Google Scholar
  53. Rueda, Marco Vinicio. 1983: Setenta Mitos Shuar. Quito: Mundo Shuar.  Google Scholar
  54. Santos-Granero, Fernando 2012. “Beinghood and People-Making in Native Amazonia: A Constructional Approach with a Perspectival Coda.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 181–211.  Google Scholar
  55. Stirling, Matthew Vincent. 1933. “Jivaro Shamanism.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 72 (3): 137–145.  Google Scholar
  56. Stirling, Matthew Vincent. 1938. Historical and Ethnographic Material on the Jivaro Indians. Washington: US Government Printing Office.  Google Scholar
  57. Streck, Bernhard. 2018. “The Killed God and His Killing Rituals. The Leitmotif of Adolf E. Jensen’s Life and Work.” In Bérose – Encyclopédie internationale des histoires de l’anthropologie, Paris, IIAC-LAHIC, UMR 8177. Available at: >http://www.berose.fr/?The-Killed-God-and-his-Killing-Rituals-The-Leitmotif-of-Adolf-E-Jensen-s-Life> (Accessed August 20, 2019).  Google Scholar
  58. Turner, Victor. 1979. “Frame, Flow and Reflection: Ritual and Drama as Public Liminality.” Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 6 (4): 465–499.  Google Scholar
  59. Uría Sandoval, Carlos. 1979. “La celebracíon de la chonta. Un caso de dualismo cultural.” PhD diss. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.  Google Scholar
  60. Virtanen, Pirjo Kristiina. 2011. “Guarding, Feeding, and Transforming. Palm Trees in the Amazonian Past and Present.” In The Archaeological Encounter. Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by Paolo Fortis and Istvan Praet, 126–173. St. Andrews: Centre for Amerindian, Latin American and Caribbean Studies.  Google Scholar
  61. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2015. The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Hau Books, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  62. Walsh, Catherine. 2009. “The Plurinational and Intercultural State: Decolonization and State Re-Founding in Ecuador.” Kult 6: 65–84.  Google Scholar
  63. Whitehead, Neil L., ed. 2003. Histories and Historicities in Amazonia. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.  Google Scholar
  64. Whitten, Norman E. Jr. 2008. “Interculturality and the Indigenization of Modernity: A View from Amazonian Ecuador.” Tipiti: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 6 (1): 1–34.  Google Scholar
  65. Whitten, Norman E. Jr., and Dorothea Scott Whitten. 2008. Puyo Runa. Imagery and Power in Modern Amazonia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.  Google Scholar
  66. Whitten, Norman E. Jr., and Dorothea Scott Whitten. 2011. Histories of the Present: People and Power in Ecuador. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.  Google Scholar
  67. Wibbelsman, Michelle. 2009. Ritual Encounters: Otavalan Modern and Mythic Community. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Dancing for Uwí (peach palm, Bactris gasipaes), a calendric ritual celebrated by the Shuar in the Ecuadorian Amazon region, forms part of a mainly animistic ontology, and has been reframed repeatedly during the past century in interaction with shifting historical, political and cultural contexts. The power field associated with Uwí is extensive, and encompasses life and death: on the one hand, Uwí stands at the centre of the ritualization of life, growth, procreativity and abundance; on the other hand, he embodies destructive agency, which has been linked with warfare and its diverse ritual frames. Uwí represents, at the same time, a significant dimension of a Shuar theory of life, as well as a figure within their theory of power, and is closely connected to conviviality and the good life. During the 1960s and 1970s Uwí was adopted and adapted by intercultural Catholic liturgy, and has acquired new ritual elements and new meanings in this context. In recent years, after large gaps between performances from the 1970s to the new millennium, Uwí and his celebration has been merged with the performance of indigeneity as part of intercultural politics in Ecuador. In this framework, the performance of an animistic ontology has been interconnected with the cultural turn in indigenous politics. This contribution explores several questions concerning ontological trajectories, as well as the relationship of ritual and cultural performances to historical developments and political issues.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Elke Mader †: Dancing for Uwí – Rituals and Ontologies on the Move 1
Abstract 1
1. Introduction 2
2. Performing Ontology 4
3. Uwí in the Mission 1
4. Uwí and the Cultural Performance of Indigeneity 1
5. Conclusion 1
References 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.