Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Cova, V (2021). The Road to Taisha: Indigenous Protests for Road Infrastructure in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Ontological Turn. Sociologus, 71(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.13
Cova, Victor (2021). "The Road to Taisha: Indigenous Protests for Road Infrastructure in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Ontological Turn" Sociologus, vol. 71no. 1, 2021 pp. 13-32. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.13
Cova, V (2021). The Road to Taisha: Indigenous Protests for Road Infrastructure in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Ontological Turn. Sociologus, Vol. 71 (Issue 1), pp 13-32. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.71.1.13

Format

The Road to Taisha: Indigenous Protests for Road Infrastructure in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Ontological Turn

Cova, Victor

Sociologus, Vol. 71 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 13–32

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Victor Cova, Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, Bartholins Allé 11, 8000 Aarhus C.

References

  1. Akchurin, Maria. 2015. “Constructing the Rights of Nature: Constitutional Reform, Mobilization, and Environmental Protection in Ecuador: Constructing the Rights of Nature.” Law & Social Inquiry 40 (4): 937–968.  Google Scholar
  2. Angosto-Ferrandez, Luis Fernando. 2015. Venezuela Reframed: Bolivarianism, Indigenous Peoples and Socialisms of the Twenty-First Century. London: Zed Press.  Google Scholar
  3. Avruch, Kevin. 2013. Context and Pretext in Conflict Resolution: Culture, Identity, Power, and Practice. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.  Google Scholar
  4. Bargh, Maria, ed. 2007. Resistance: An Indigenous Response to Neoliberalism. Wellington, NZ: Huia Publishers.  Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, Mia M. 2018. “From State-Initiated to Indigenous-Driven Infrastructure: The Unovialuit and Canada’s First Highway to the Arctic Ocean.” World Development 109: 134–148.  Google Scholar
  6. Bens, Jonas. 2015. “Multiple Legal Ontologies? Indigenous Rights and the Noble Savage.” Paper presented at the Trans-Environmental Dynamics: Understanding and Debating Ontologies, Politics and History in Latin America, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.  Google Scholar
  7. Bessire, Lucas, and David Bond. 2014. “Ontological Anthropology and the Deferral of Critique.” American Ethnologist 41 (3): 440–456.  Google Scholar
  8. Brown, Michael F. 1985. Tsewa’s Gift: Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.  Google Scholar
  9. Cova, Victor. 2015. “Manioc Beer and the Word of God: Faces of the Future in Makuma, Ecuador.” PhD diss., University of St Andrews.  Google Scholar
  10. Descola, Philippe. 1982. “Territorial Adjustments among the Achuar of Ecuador.” Social Science Information 21 (2): 301–320.  Google Scholar
  11. Descola, Philippe. 1996. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. New York: Cambridge University of Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Descola, Philippe. 2005. Par-delà Nature et Culture. Paris: Gallimard.  Google Scholar
  13. El Comercio. 2014. “Pepe Acacho Dijo Que Los Delitos Por Los Cuales Le Sentenciaron Ya no Existen.” El Comercio, 22/09/2014. Accessed March 18, 2018. http://www.elcom ercio.com/actualidad/pepe-acacho-delitos-sabotaje-terrorismo.html.  Google Scholar
  14. El Universo. 2009. “Bosco Wisum Es Símbolo De Lucha Para Amazónicos.” El Universo, 04/10/2009.  Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, William. 1994. “Megadevelopment, Environmentalism, and Resistance: The Institutional Context of Kayapó Indigenous Politics in Central Brazil.” Human Organization 53 (3): 220–232.  Google Scholar
  16. Gedicks, Al. 2001. The New Resource Wars: Native and Environmental Struggles against Multinational Corporations. New York, NY: South End Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, Todd, and Jeffery R. Webber. 2008. “Imperialism and Resistance: Canadian Mining Companies in Latin America.” Third World Quarterly 29: 63–87.  Google Scholar
  18. Hage, Ghassan. 2012. “Critical Anthropological Thought and the Radical Political Imaginary Today.” Critical Anthropology 32 (3): 285–308.  Google Scholar
  19. Holbraad, Martin. 2011. Can the Thing Speak? St Andrews: Open Anthropology Cooperative Press.  Google Scholar
  20. Holbraad, Martin and Morton Axel Pedersen. 2018. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, Eduardo. 2015. “Anthropology of Ontologies.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44: 311–327.  Google Scholar
  22. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  23. Lima, Tania Stolze. 1999. “The Two and Its Many: Reflections on Perspectivism in a Tupi Cosmology.” Ethnos 64 (1): 107–131.  Google Scholar
  24. Mader, Elke. 1995. “Die Attacke der Grünen Magie. Interkulturelle Prozesse im Schamanismus der Shuar (Ekuador).” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 120: 177–190.  Google Scholar
  25. Mader, Elke. 1999. Metamorfosis Del Poder: Persona, Mito Y Visión En La Sociedad Shuar Y Achuar (Ecuador, Perú). Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Abya-Yala.  Google Scholar
  26. Mignolo, Walter and Catherine Walsh. 2018. On Decoloniality: Concept, Analytics, Praxis. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Orta-Martínez, Martí, and Matt Finer. 2010. “Oil Frontiers and Indigenous Resistance in the Peruvian Amazon.” Ecological Economics 70 (2): 207–218.  Google Scholar
  28. Pickering, Andrew. 2017. “The Ontological Turn: Taking Different Worlds Seriously.” Social Analysis 61 (2): 134–150.  Google Scholar
  29. Plan V. 2014. “Muerte De José Tendetza: La Ley Del Silencio.” Plan V, 16/12/2014.  Google Scholar
  30. Postero, Nancy. 2017. The Indigenous State: Race, Politics, and Performance in Plurinational Bolivia. Berkeley: University of California Press.  Google Scholar
  31. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 1993. Labor’s Lot: The Power, History, and Culture of Aboriginal Action. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  32. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Politics, History, and Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2006. The Empire of Love: Toward a Theory of Intimacy, Genealogy, and Carnality. Public Planet Books. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  34. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2011. Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  35. Ramos, Alcida. 2012. “The Politics of Perspectivism.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 481–494.  Google Scholar
  36. Rubenstein, Steven Lee. 2012. “On the Importance of Visions among the Amazonian Shuar.” Current Anthropology 53 (1): 39–79.  Google Scholar
  37. Rudel, Thomas K., Diane Bates, and Rafael Machinguiashi. 2002. “Ecologically Noble Amerindians? Cattle Ranching and Cash Cropping among Shuar and Colonists in Ecuador.” Latin American Research Review 37 (1): 144–159.  Google Scholar
  38. Rudel, Thomas K., Tuntiak Katan, and Bruce Horowitz. 2013. “Amerindian Livelihoods, Outside Interventions, and Poverty Traps in the Ecuadorian Amazon.” Rural Sociology 78 (2): 167–185.  Google Scholar
  39. Spronk, Susan, and Jeffery R. Webber. 2007. “Struggles against Accumulation by Dispossession in Bolivia.” Latin American Perspectives 34 (2): 31–47.  Google Scholar
  40. Stadler, Stephanie. 2019. Conflict Culture and Communication. Milton: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, Anne-Christine. 1981. “God-Wealth: The Achuar and the Missions.” In Cultural Transformations and Ethnicity in Modern Ecuador, edited by Norman E. Whitten Jr., 647–676. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.  Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, Anne-Christine. 1997. “L’Oubli Des Morts Et La Mémoire Des Meurtres.” Terrain 29 (2): 83–96.  Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, Anne-Christine. 2000. “Le Sexe De La Proie.” L’Homme 1 54–155: 309–334.  Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, Anne-Christine. 2003. “Les Masques De La Mémoire.” L’Homme 165 (1): 223–248.  Google Scholar
  45. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. “Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4 (3): 469–488.  Google Scholar
  46. Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2 (1): 3–23.  Google Scholar
  47. Wada, Takeshi. 2012. “Modularity and Transferability of Repertoires of Contention.” Social Problems 59 (4): 544–571.  Google Scholar

Abstract

This contribution examines protests by Shuar people in the Ecuadorian Amazon during the summer of 2015 in favour of the construction of a road through their territory. Can the ontological turn help us understand such events? Debates around the ontological turn have hinged around its potential contribution to the analysis of environmental challenges and political conflicts. In this article, I argue that central concepts from the ontological turn – such as animism (Descola 2005) or perspectivism (Viveiros de Castro 2004) – may add nuance but not substance to anthropological understandings of environmental conflicts. I focus on the stakes of these conflicts, the construction of alliances, and the tactics used by the different stakeholders. Taking to heart one of the core premises of the ontological turn, we may think that Western concepts of “nature” and “culture” may hinder our understanding of indigenous Amazonian people’s participation in these conflicts. I argue on the contrary that efforts to overcome these concepts may precisely risk concealing or distorting the actions and statements of indigenous people involved in the conflict.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Victor Cova: The Road to Taisha: Indigenous Protests for Road Infrastructure in the Ecuadorian Amazon and the Ontological Turn 1
Abstract 1
1. Introduction 1
2. The Ontological Turn and Shuar Perceptions of Environmental Conflicts 5
3. Alliances beyond Nature and Culture? 7
4. Protest Tactics beyond Nature and Culture 1
5. Discussion: Limits of Ontology 1
References 1