Menu Expand

Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship
  4. Vol. 69, Issue 3
  5. pp. 169–186

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Hora, W., Klammer, A. Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 69(3), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.3.169
Hora, Wolfgang and Klammer, Adrian "Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 69.3, 2021, 169-186. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.3.169
Hora, Wolfgang/Klammer, Adrian (2021): Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 69, iss. 3, 169-186, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.3.169
Format
Download

Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen

Hora, Wolfgang | Klammer, Adrian

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 69 (2021), Iss. 3 : pp. 169–186

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot GmbH
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.3.169
Language
German
Pages
18

Pricing

Individual
€ 24.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Dr. Wolfgang Hora, Universität Liechtenstein, Institut für Entrepreneurship, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz

Dr. Adrian Klammer, Universität Liechtenstein, Institut für Entrepreneurship, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse, 9490 Vaduz

References

  1. Acs, Z. J. und Mueller, P. (2008): Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants, in: Small Business Economics, 30 (1), 85–100.  Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S. A. und Busenitz, L. (2001): The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory, in: Journal of Management, 27 (6), 755–775.  Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, K. R. (1971): The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.  Google Scholar
  4. Barney, J. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.  Google Scholar
  5. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F. und Neubaum, D. O. (2005): A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (5), 663–687.  Google Scholar
  6. Baum, J. R. und Bird, B. J. (2010): The Successful Intelligence of High-Growth Entrepreneurs: Links to New Venture Growth, in: Organization Science, 21 (2), 397–412.  Google Scholar
  7. Birch, D. L. (1979): The job generation process, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.  Google Scholar
  8. Birch, D. L. und Medoff, J. (1994): Grazelles, in: Solomon, L. C. und Levenson, A. R. (Hrsg.): Labor markets, employment policy and job creation, Boulder, CO: Westview, 159–167.  Google Scholar
  9. Brown, R., Mawson, S. und Mason, C. (2017): Myth – busting and entrepreneurship policy: the case of high growth firms, in: Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29 (5–6), 414–443.  Google Scholar
  10. Carayannopoulos, S. (2009): How Technology-Based New Firms Leverage Newness and Smallness to Commercialize Disruptive Technologies, in: Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 33 (2), 419–438.  Google Scholar
  11. Coff, R. W. (2002): Human Capital, Shared Expertise, and the Likelihood of Impasse in Corporate Acquisitions, in: Journal of Management, 28 (1), 107–128.  Google Scholar
  12. Daunfeldt, S.-O., Elert, N. und Johansson, D. (2014): The Economic Contribution of High-Growth Firms: Do Policy Implications Depend on the Choice of Growth Indicator?, in: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14, 337–365.  Google Scholar
  13. Daunfeldt, S.-O., Elert, N. und Johansson, D. (2016): Are high-growth firms overrepresented in high-tech industries?, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 25 (1), 1–21.  Google Scholar
  14. Davidsson, P. und Henrekson, M. (2002): Determinants of the Prevalance of Start-ups and High-Growth Firms, in: Small Business Economics, 19, 81–104.  Google Scholar
  15. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. und Gartner, W. B. (2003): Arriving at the high-growth firm, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2), 189–216.  Google Scholar
  16. Delmar, F., McKelvie, A. und Wennberg, K. (2013): Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms, in: Technovation, 33 (8–9), 276–291.  Google Scholar
  17. Demir, R., Wennberg, K. und McKelvie, A. (2017): The Strategic Management of High-Growth Firms: A Review and Theoretical Conceptualization, in: Long Range Planning, 50 (4), 431–456.  Google Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, in: Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.  Google Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M. und Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990): Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth Among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978–1988, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), 504–529.  Google Scholar
  20. Florin, J., Lubatkin, M. und Schulze, W. (2003): A Social Capital Model of High-Growth Ventures, in: Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 374–384.  Google Scholar
  21. Gast, J., Hora, W., Bouncken, R. B. und Kraus, S. (2018): Challenges and merits of coopetitive innovation, in: Fernandez, A.-S., Le Roy, F., Chiambaretto, P. und Czakon, W. (Hrsg.): The Routledge Companion to Coopetition Strategies, London: Routledge, 283–297.  Google Scholar
  22. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. und Hamilton, A. L. (2012): Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology, in: Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 15–31.  Google Scholar
  23. Henrekson, M. und Johansson, D. (2010): Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence, in Small Business Economics, 35, 227–244.  Google Scholar
  24. Hölzl, W. (2009): Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries, in: Small Business Economics, 33, 59–75.  Google Scholar
  25. Hölzl, W. (2014): Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 23 (1), 199–231.  Google Scholar
  26. Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W. und Fahy, J. (2005): The performance impact of marketing resources, in: Journal of Business Research, 58 (1), 18–27.  Google Scholar
  27. Hora, W., Gast, J., Kailer, N., Rey-Marti, A. und Mas-Tur, A. (2018): David and Goliath: causes and effects of coopetition between start-ups and corporates, in: Review of Managerial Science, 12 (2), 411–439.  Google Scholar
  28. Lopez-Garcia, P. und Puente, S. (2012): What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data, in: Small Business Economics, 39, 1029–1041.  Google Scholar
  29. Love, J. H. und Roper, S. (2015): SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence, in: International Small Business Journal, 33 (1), 28–48.  Google Scholar
  30. Mayring, P. (2002): Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung, 5. Aufl., Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.  Google Scholar
  31. McKelvie, A. und Wiklund, J. (2010): Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (2), 261–288.  Google Scholar
  32. McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J. und Davidsson, P. (2006): A Resource-Based View on Organic and Acquired Growth, in: Wiklund, J., Dimov, D., Katz, J. A. und Shepherd, D. A. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurship: Frameworks And Empirical Investigations From Forthcoming Leaders Of European Research, Bingley: Emerald, 175–194.  Google Scholar
  33. Minichberger, A. und Schwingsmehl, M. (2019): Gazelle ≠ Gazelle – Analyse einer Begriffsverwendung, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 67 (4), 257–276.  Google Scholar
  34. Moreno, F. und Coad, A. (2015): High-Growth Firms: Stylized Facts and Conflicting Results, in: Corbett, A. C., Katz, J. A. und McKelvie, A. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurial Growth: Individual, Firm, and Region Bingley: Emerald, 187–230.  Google Scholar
  35. O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A. und Gallear, D. (2006): In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs, in: Technovation, 26 (1), 30–41.  Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2007): Eurostat – OECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics, Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  37. Penrose, E. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, G. W. (1999): Measuring the Typicality of Text: Using Multiple Coders for More Than Just Reliability and Validity Checks, in: Human Organization, 58 (3), 313–322.  Google Scholar
  39. Saldaña, J. (2015): The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3. Aufl., London: Sage.  Google Scholar
  40. Saßmannshausen, S. P. und Volkmann, C. (2012): „Gazellen“ – schnell wachsende Jungunternehmen: Definitionen, Forschungsrichtungen und Implikationen, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 60 (2), 163–177.  Google Scholar
  41. Shane, S. (2009): Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy, in: Small Business Economics, 33 (2), 141–149.  Google Scholar
  42. Sims, M. A. und O’Regan, N. (2006): In search of gazelles using a research DNA model, in: Technovation, 26 (8), 943–954.  Google Scholar
  43. Tomenendal, M. und Raffer, C. (2015): Gazellen auf der Spur – Ein strukturationstheoretisches Wachstumsmodell auf Basis von Fallstudien junger Unternehmen aus dem Energietechnik-Sektor, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 63 (2), 149–182.  Google Scholar
  44. Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171–180.  Google Scholar
  45. Wernerfelt, B. (1995): The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After, in: Strategic Management Journal, 16 (3), 171–174.  Google Scholar
  46. Yin, R. K. (2018): Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6. Aufl., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  47. Birch, D. L. (1979): The job generation process, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.  Google Scholar
  48. Birch, D. L. und Medoff, J. (1994): Grazelles, in: Solomon, L. C. und Levenson, A. R. (Hrsg.): Labor markets, employment policy and job creation, Boulder, CO: Westview, 159–167.  Google Scholar
  49. Brown, R., Mawson, S. und Mason, C. (2017): Myth – busting and entrepreneurship policy: the case of high growth firms, in: Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29 (5–6), 414–443.  Google Scholar
  50. Carayannopoulos, S. (2009): How Technology-Based New Firms Leverage Newness and Smallness to Commercialize Disruptive Technologies, in: Entrepreneurship Theory Practice, 33 (2), 419–438.  Google Scholar
  51. Coff, R. W. (2002): Human Capital, Shared Expertise, and the Likelihood of Impasse in Corporate Acquisitions, in: Journal of Management, 28 (1), 107–128.  Google Scholar
  52. Daunfeldt, S.-O., Elert, N. und Johansson, D. (2014): The Economic Contribution of High-Growth Firms: Do Policy Implications Depend on the Choice of Growth Indicator?, in: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14, 337–365.  Google Scholar
  53. Daunfeldt, S.-O., Elert, N. und Johansson, D. (2016): Are high-growth firms overrepresented in high-tech industries?, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 25 (1), 1–21.  Google Scholar
  54. Davidsson, P. und Henrekson, M. (2002): Determinants of the Prevalance of Start-ups and High-Growth Firms, in: Small Business Economics, 19, 81–104.  Google Scholar
  55. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P. und Gartner, W. B. (2003): Arriving at the high-growth firm, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2), 189–216.  Google Scholar
  56. Delmar, F., McKelvie, A. und Wennberg, K. (2013): Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms, in: Technovation, 33 (8–9), 276–291.  Google Scholar
  57. Demir, R., Wennberg, K. und McKelvie, A. (2017): The Strategic Management of High-Growth Firms: A Review and Theoretical Conceptualization, in: Long Range Planning, 50 (4), 431–456.  Google Scholar
  58. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, in: Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532–550.  Google Scholar
  59. Eisenhardt, K. M. und Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990): Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth Among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978–1988, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), 504–529.  Google Scholar
  60. Florin, J., Lubatkin, M. und Schulze, W. (2003): A Social Capital Model of High-Growth Ventures, in: Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 374–384.  Google Scholar
  61. Gast, J., Hora, W., Bouncken, R. B. und Kraus, S. (2018): Challenges and merits of coopetitive innovation, in: Fernandez, A.-S., Le Roy, F., Chiambaretto, P. und Czakon, W. (Hrsg.): The Routledge Companion to Coopetition Strategies, London: Routledge, 283–297.  Google Scholar
  62. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. und Hamilton, A. L. (2012): Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology, in: Organizational Research Methods, 16 (1), 15–31.  Google Scholar
  63. Henrekson, M. und Johansson, D. (2010): Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence, in Small Business Economics, 35, 227–244.  Google Scholar
  64. Hölzl, W. (2009): Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries, in: Small Business Economics, 33, 59–75.  Google Scholar
  65. Hölzl, W. (2014): Persistence, survival, and growth: a closer look at 20 years of fast-growing firms in Austria, in: Industrial and Corporate Change, 23 (1), 199–231.  Google Scholar
  66. Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W. und Fahy, J. (2005): The performance impact of marketing resources, in: Journal of Business Research, 58 (1), 18–27.  Google Scholar
  67. Hora, W., Gast, J., Kailer, N., Rey-Marti, A. und Mas-Tur, A. (2018): David and Goliath: causes and effects of coopetition between start-ups and corporates, in: Review of Managerial Science, 12 (2), 411–439.  Google Scholar
  68. Lopez-Garcia, P. und Puente, S. (2012): What makes a high-growth firm? A dynamic probit analysis using Spanish firm-level data, in: Small Business Economics, 39, 1029–1041.  Google Scholar
  69. Love, J. H. und Roper, S. (2015): SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence, in: International Small Business Journal, 33 (1), 28–48.  Google Scholar
  70. Mayring, P. (2002): Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung, 5. Aufl., Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.  Google Scholar
  71. McKelvie, A. und Wiklund, J. (2010): Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34 (2), 261–288.  Google Scholar
  72. McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J. und Davidsson, P. (2006): A Resource-Based View on Organic and Acquired Growth, in: Wiklund, J., Dimov, D., Katz, J. A. und Shepherd, D. A. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurship: Frameworks And Empirical Investigations From Forthcoming Leaders Of European Research, Bingley: Emerald, 175–194.  Google Scholar
  73. Minichberger, A. und Schwingsmehl, M. (2019): Gazelle ? Gazelle – Analyse einer Begriffsverwendung, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 67 (4), 257–276.  Google Scholar
  74. Moreno, F. und Coad, A. (2015): High-Growth Firms: Stylized Facts and Conflicting Results, in: Corbett, A. C., Katz, J. A. und McKelvie, A. (Hrsg.): Entrepreneurial Growth: Individual, Firm, and Region Bingley: Emerald, 187–230.  Google Scholar
  75. O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A. und Gallear, D. (2006): In search of the drivers of high growth in manufacturing SMEs, in: Technovation, 26 (1), 30–41.  Google Scholar
  76. OECD (2007): Eurostat – OECD Manual on Business Demography Statistics, Paris: OECD.  Google Scholar
  77. Penrose, E. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  78. Ryan, G. W. (1999): Measuring the Typicality of Text: Using Multiple Coders for More Than Just Reliability and Validity Checks, in: Human Organization, 58 (3), 313–322.  Google Scholar
  79. Saldaña, J. (2015): The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 3. Aufl., London: Sage.  Google Scholar
  80. Saßmannshausen, S. P. und Volkmann, C. (2012): „Gazellen“ – schnell wachsende Jungunternehmen: Definitionen, Forschungsrichtungen und Implikationen, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 60 (2), 163–177.  Google Scholar
  81. Shane, S. (2009): Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy, in: Small Business Economics, 33 (2), 141–149.  Google Scholar
  82. Sims, M. A. und O’Regan, N. (2006): In search of gazelles using a research DNA model, in: Technovation, 26 (8), 943–954.  Google Scholar
  83. Tomenendal, M. und Raffer, C. (2015): Gazellen auf der Spur – Ein strukturationstheoretisches Wachstumsmodell auf Basis von Fallstudien junger Unternehmen aus dem Energietechnik-Sektor, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 63 (2), 149–182.  Google Scholar
  84. Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171–180.  Google Scholar
  85. Wernerfelt, B. (1995): The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After, in: Strategic Management Journal, 16 (3), 171–174.  Google Scholar
  86. Yin, R. K. (2018): Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6. Aufl., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  87. Acs, Z. J. und Mueller, P. (2008): Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, gazelles and elephants, in: Small Business Economics, 30 (1), 85–100.  Google Scholar
  88. Alvarez, S. A. und Busenitz, L. (2001): The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory, in: Journal of Management, 27 (6), 755–775.  Google Scholar
  89. Andrews, K. R. (1971): The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Homewood: Dow Jones-Irwin.  Google Scholar
  90. Barney, J. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.  Google Scholar
  91. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F. und Neubaum, D. O. (2005): A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (5), 663–687.  Google Scholar
  92. Baum, J. R. und Bird, B. J. (2010): The Successful Intelligence of High-Growth Entrepreneurs: Links to New Venture Growth, in: Organization Science, 21 (2), 397–412.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Higher, faster, further? An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Management of Fast-Growing Start-Ups

Recent studies show that a small share of young, fast-growing firm – so-called gazelles – account for a disproportionately large supply of new jobs and, therefore, contribute significantly to the economic development of many countries. However, the majority of these studies mainly focus on a quantitative assessment of these special types of enterprises as well as developing suitable business policy support measures to foster them. In-depth examinations have been largely missing so far. We address this gap by conducting an explorative, case-based research approach to determine how gazelles strategically manage important resources to facilitate superior firm growth.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Wolfgang Hora / Adrian Klammer: Höher, schneller, weiter? Eine empirische Analyse des strategischen Managements von schnell wachsenden Jungunternehmen 1
Zusammenfassung 1
Abstract 2
I. Einleitung und Problemstellung 2
II. Theoretischer Hintergrund 3
III. Methodik und Stichprobe 5
IV. Ergebnisse 7
1. Entrepreneur 8
2. Humanressourcen und HR-Praktiken 9
3. Innovation und Kundenfokus 1
4. Strategische Planung 1
5. Unterstützende Ressourcen 1
V. Diskussion und Fazit 1
Literatur 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.