Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”
Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, Vol. 38(2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 105–120 | First published online: October 25, 2022
1 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
George Kovacs
Cited By
-
The Collision of Science with the Question of Be-ing in Heidegger’s Thinking
Kovacs, George
Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, Vol. 39(2023), Iss. 1 P.119
https://doi.org/10.3790/heist.39.1.119 [Citations: 0]
References
-
Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. Transzendenz und Ereignis. Heideggers Beiträge zur Philosophie. Ein Kommentar. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2019.
Google Scholar -
Gennaro, Ivo De. “Sciency of Being and Ethics for Science in Heidegger’s Black Notebooks”, in: Heidegger Studies 37 (2021): 87 – 118.
Google Scholar -
Kovacs, George. “An Invitation to Think through and with Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie”, in: Heidegger Studies 12 (1996): 17 – 36.
Google Scholar -
Kovacs, George. Thinking and Be-ing in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Bucharest: Zeta Books 2015.
Google Scholar -
Kovacs, George. “The Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s Zum Ereignis-Denken”, in: Heidegger Studies 35 (2019): 175 – 192.
Google Scholar -
Schalow, Frank. Departures: At the Crossroads between Heidegger and Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2013.
Google Scholar -
Schalow, Frank. “Being-Historical Thinking and the Ontological Difference: Extending Heidegger’s Auseinanderstetzung with Kant”, in: Existentia XXIX/3 – 4 (2019): 193 – 208.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”
Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge” Heidegger’s understanding of the relationship between philosophy and science is expressed in his claim that they are not hostile towards each other, i. e., that philosophy is neither for nor against science, though they differ in ambition, strength, and methodology. Their interaction, as this essay suggests, may contribute to the range and diversification of philosophical thinking and to a deeper grasp of the strength and boundary (potential and limitation) of scientific inquiry and knowing. Heidegger’s rethinking of science, especially in his twenty-four “propositions about science”, includes a critical assessment of the status of science in the epoch of modernity; it discerns (discovers, discloses) the truth of science in its relation to the measure of truth in beings, and to the truth of be-ing. The entire inquiry at hand is grounded in be-ing-historical thinking and mindfulness.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| George Kovacs: Lessons from Heidegger's Attempt to Rethink Science in his | 105 | ||
| I. Comprehensive Perspective | 105 | ||
| II. Grounding in Be-ing-historical Thinking | 108 | ||
| III. Main Claims about and Insights into Science | 111 | ||
| IV. Lessons and Concluding Reflection | 116 | ||
| Bibliography | 119 | ||
| Abstract | 119 | ||
| Lessons from Heidegger's Attempt to Rethink Science in his \"Beiträge | 119 |