Menu Expand

Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital
  4. Vol. 39, Issue 1
  5. pp. 11–42

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Morawski, J., Rehkugler, H. Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 39(1), 11-42. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.11
Morawski, Jaroslaw and Rehkugler, Heinz "Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 39.1, 2006, 11-42. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.11
Morawski, Jaroslaw/Rehkugler, Heinz (2006): Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 39, iss. 1, 11-42, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.11
Format
Download

Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt

Morawski, Jaroslaw | Rehkugler, Heinz

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 39 (2006), Iss. 1 : pp. 11–42

Read Now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.11
Language
Multiple languages
Pages
32

Author Details

Jaroslaw Morawski, Freiburg

Heinz Rehkugler, Freiburg

References

  1. Bawa, V. S. (1975): Optimal Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects, Journal of Financial Economics, 2, 95-121.  Google Scholar
  2. Bond, S. A. und Patel, K. (2001): The Conditional Distribution of Real Estate Returns: Relating time variation in higher moments to downside risk measurement, Working Paper, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 13. March.  Google Scholar
  3. Byrne, P. und Lee, S. (1997): Real Estate Portfolio Analysis under Conditions of Non-Normality: The Case of NCREIF, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 3, 37-46  Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, P. und Wolverton, M. L. (2001): MPT and the Downside Risk Framework: A Comment on Two Recent Studies, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 7, 125-131.  Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, M. S. und Mansour, A. (2005): Real Estate in the Real World: Dealing with Non-Normality and Risk in an Asset Allocation Model. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 11, 37-53.  Google Scholar
  6. Eichholtz, P. und Huisman, R. (1998): Busts in House Prices, Working Paper, Social Science Research Network, 3. Juni.  Google Scholar
  7. Fama, E. F. (1995), Random Walks in Stock Market Prices, Financial Analysts Journal, 51, 75-61.  Google Scholar
  8. Fishburn, P. C. (1977): Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associates with Below-Target Returns, Financial Analysts Journal, 67, 116-126.  Google Scholar
  9. Füss, R. (2004): Emerging Markets im internationalen Portfoliomanagement: Entwicklungsstand, Integrationsgrad und Rendite-Risiko-Verhalten von Aktienmärkten in Schwellenländern, Uhlenbruch Verlag, Bad Soden.  Google Scholar
  10. Geltner, D. (1989): Bias in Appraisal-Based Returns, AREUEA Journal, 17, 338-352.  Google Scholar
  11. Giliberto, S. (1988): A Note on the Use of Appraisal Data in Indexes of Performance Measure, AREUEA Journal, 16, 77-83.  Google Scholar
  12. Giliberto, S. (1992): The Allocation of Real Estate to Future Mixed-Asset Institutional Portfolios, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 7, 423-432.  Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, J. N. und Tse, E. W. K. (2003): VaR: A Tool to Measure Leverage Risk, The Journal of Portfolio Management, Special Real Estate Issue, 62-65.  Google Scholar
  14. Graff, R. A., Harrington, A. und Young, M. S. (1997): The Shape of Australian Real Estate Return Distributions and Comparison to the United States, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 14, 291-308.  Google Scholar
  15. Harlow, W. V. (1991): Asset Allocation in a Downside-Risk Framework, Financial Analysts Journal, 47, 28-40.  Google Scholar
  16. Hartzell, D. J., Hekman, J. und Miles, M. (1986): Diversification Categories in Investment Real Estate, AREUEA Journal, 14, 230-254.  Google Scholar
  17. Hommel, U. und Lehmann, H. (2002): Risiko-Management in der Immobilienfinanzierung, in: Schulte, K.-W., Achleitner, A.-K., Schäfers, W. und Knobloch, B. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Immobilien-Banking: von der traditionellen Finanzierung zum Investment-Banking, Rudolf Müller Verlag, Köln.  Google Scholar
  18. Johanning, L. (1998): Value-at-Risk zur Marktrisikosteuerung und Eigenkapitalallokation, Uhlenbruch Verlag, Bad Soden.  Google Scholar
  19. Jorion, P. (1997): Value-at- Risk, McGraw-Hills, New York u. a.  Google Scholar
  20. Kerling, M. (1998): Moderne Konzepte der Finanzanalyse: Markthypothesen, Renditegenerierungsprozesse und Modellierungswerkzeuge, Uhlenbruch Verlag, Bad Soden.  Google Scholar
  21. Keppler, M. (1991): Portfolio-Theorie: Zweifelhafte Annahmen, suboptimale Ergebnisse, Die Bank, 7, 382-385.  Google Scholar
  22. King, D. A. und Young, M. S. (1994): Why diversification doesn't work, Real Estate Review, 24, 6-13.  Google Scholar
  23. Lai, T.-Y. und Wang, K. (1996): Appraisal Smoothing: The Other Side of the Story, Real Estate Economics, 26, 511-535.  Google Scholar
  24. Liu, C. H., Hartzell, D. J. und Grissom, T. V. (1992): The Role of Co-Skewness in the Pricing of Real Estate, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 5, 299-319.  Google Scholar
  25. Lu, K. W. und Mei, J. P. (1999): The Return Distributions of Property Shares in Emerging Markets, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 5, 145-160.  Google Scholar
  26. Maurer, R., Reiner, F. und Sebastian, S. (2004): Characteristics of German Real Estate Return Distributions: Evidence from Germany and Comparison to the U.S. and U.K., Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 10, 59-76.  Google Scholar
  27. Markowitz, H.M. (1959): Portfolio Selection, John Wiley & Sons, New York.  Google Scholar
  28. Miles, M. und McCue, T. (1984): Commercial Real Estate Returns, AREUEA Journal, 12, 355-377.  Google Scholar
  29. Myer, F. C. N. und Webb, J. R. (1993): Return Properties of Equity REITs, Common Stocks, and Commercial Real Estate: A Comparison, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 8, 87-106.  Google Scholar
  30. Nawrocki, D. N. (1999): A Brief History of Downside Risk Measures, The Journal of Investing, Fall, 9-25.  Google Scholar
  31. Pagliari, J. L. und Webb, J. R. (1995): A Fundamental Examination of Securitized and Unsecuritized Real Estate, The Journal of Real Estate Research, 10, 381-425.  Google Scholar
  32. Poddig, T., Dichtl, H. und Petersmeier, K. (2001): Statistik, Ökonometrie, Optimierung, 2. Aufl., Uhlenbruch Verlag, Bad Soden.  Google Scholar
  33. Ring Deutscher Makler (1972-2000): Immobilienpreisspiegel, Hamburg.  Google Scholar
  34. Rehkugler, H., Jandura, D. und zu Sayn-Wittgenstein, I. (1999): Erfolg mit Timingstrategien?, in: Frei, N. und Schlienkamp, C. (Hrsg.): Aktie im Fokus, Gabler, Wiesbaden.  Google Scholar
  35. Roy, A. D. (1952): Safety First and the Holding of Assets, Econometrica, 20, 431-449.  Google Scholar
  36. Rudolf, M. (1994): Algorithms for Portfolio Optimization and Portfolio Insurance, Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern u. a.  Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt-von Rhein, A. (1996): Die Moderne Portfoliotheorie im praktischen Wertpapiermanagement, Uhlenbruch Verlag, Bad Soden/Ts.  Google Scholar
  38. Seiler, M. J., Webb, J. R. und Myer, F. C. N. (1999): Are EREITs Real Estate?, The Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 5, 171-181.  Google Scholar
  39. Sing, T. F. und Ong, S. E. (2000): Asset Allocation in a Downside Risk Framework, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6, 213-223.  Google Scholar
  40. Sivitanides, P. S. (1998): A Downside-Risk Approach to Real Estate Portfolio Structuring, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 4, 159-168.  Google Scholar
  41. Sortino, F. A. und van der Meer, R. (1991): Downside risk, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 17, 27-32.  Google Scholar
  42. Tesler, L. G. (1955): Safety First and Hedging, Review of Economic Studies, 23, 1-16.  Google Scholar
  43. v. Trotha, M.-G. (2003): Immobilie als Kapitalanlage, Logos Verlag, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  44. Wheaton, W. C., Torto, R. G., Southard, J. A. und Hopkins, R. E. (2001): Evaluating Real Estate Risk: Debt Applications, Real Estate Finance, Fall, 29-41.  Google Scholar
  45. Vandell, R. F. (1981): Is beta a useful measure of risk?, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 7, 23-31.  Google Scholar
  46. Wüstefeld, H. (2000): Risiko und Rendite von Immobilieninvestments, Fritz Knapp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.  Google Scholar
  47. Young, M. S. und Graff, R. A. (1995): Real Estate Is Not Normal: A Fresh Look at Real Estate Return Distributions, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 225-259.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Application of Downside Risk Measures on the German Residential Real Estate Market

Investment risk measurement is inevitable for efficient allocation of capital, yet the choice of the appropriate risk measure turns out to be problematic. This paper discusses the possible advantages of application of downside risk measures on direct real estate investments. These considerations are caused by the stated nonnormality of real estate returns. An empirical study on the German residential property market yields that using downside risk measures can be advantageous for real estate investors; however, the differences to the traditional volatility approach are smaller than expected.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Jaroslaw Morawski / Heinz Rehkugler: Anwendung von Downside-Risikomaßen auf dem deutschen Wohnungsmarkt 11
I. Einführung 11
II. Downside-Risikomaße 13
III. DR-Maße bei Immobilieninvestitionen 17
1. Verteilung der Immobilienrenditen 17
2. Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der DR-Maße 22
IV. Deutscher Wohnungsmarkt 26
1. Datenmaterial 27
2. Renditeverteilung 28
3. Relatives Risiko 31
4. Wohnimmobilienportfolios 34
V. Fazit 38
Literatur 40
Zusammenfassung 42
Summary 42

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.