Konzernbildung, Eigner/Gläubiger-Konflikte und Unterinvestitionsproblematik
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Konzernbildung, Eigner/Gläubiger-Konflikte und Unterinvestitionsproblematik
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 34 (2001), Iss. 1 : pp. 106–129
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Hans Rau-Bredow, Würzburg
References
-
Adler, H./Düring, W./Schmaltz, K. (1995): Rechnungslegung und Prüfung der Unternehmen, 5. Auflage.
Google Scholar -
Bingham, N. H./Kiesel, R. (1998): Risk-Neutral Valuation, Pricing and Hedging of Financial Derivatives.
Google Scholar -
Black, F./Scholes, M. (1973): The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities, in: Journal of Political Economy, S. 649ff.
Google Scholar -
Ewert, R. (1984): Zur Beziehung zwischen Investitionsvolumen, Fremdfinanzierung und Bilanzkennzahlen, Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 36, S. 825-841.
Google Scholar -
Jensen,: M./Meckling, W. (1976): Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior; Agency Costs, and Capital Structure, in: Journal of Financial Economics, 3, S. 305-360.
Google Scholar -
Kürsten, W. (1994): Finanzkontrakte und Risikoanreizproblem. Mißverständnisse im informationsökonomischen Ansatz der Finanztheorie.
Google Scholar -
Lehmann, M. (1986): Das Privileg der beschränkten Haftung und der Durchgriff im Gesellschafts- und Konzernrecht, in: Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht, 15, S. 345-370.
Google Scholar -
Lutter, M./Scheffler, E./Schneider, U. H. (Hrsg.) (1998): Handbuch der Konzernfinanzierung.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Group Building, Shareholder/Creditor Conflicts and the Underinvestment Problem
An underinvestment problem arises where a complementary investment with a positive net present value increases only the market value of debt, but not that of equity. However, shifting the complementary investment and, where appropriate, also other projects to a subsidiary might represent a way out of the dilemma. This contribution analyses the resultant consequences for the market value of equity and of debt because the parent company’s creditors might interpret such shifts as a risk-increasing and, thus, disadvantageous substitution of direct assets for equity. This paper discusses also the implications of the liability a parent company may bear for claims against its subsidiary. This contribution also shows that the problem of overinvestment in projects with a negative cash value might aggravate.