Menu Expand

Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Guender, A. Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 34(4), 526-553. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.34.4.526
Guender, Alfred V. "Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 34.4, 2001, 526-553. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.34.4.526
Guender, Alfred V. (2001): Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 34, iss. 4, 526-553, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.34.4.526

Format

Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting

Guender, Alfred V.

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 34 (2001), Iss. 4 : pp. 526–553

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Alfred V. Guender, Christchurch/New Zealand

References

  1. Asako, Kazumi and Wagner, Helmut: “Nominal Income Targeting Versus Money Supply Targeting,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 39 (May 1992), 167-87.  Google Scholar
  2. Ball, Lawrence: “Efficient Rules For Monetary Policy,” NBER Working Paper (5952), (1997).  Google Scholar
  3. Bean, Charles R.: “Targeting Nominal Income: An Appraisal,” Economic Journal, 93 (December 1983), 806-19.  Google Scholar
  4. Bernanke, Ben S. and Mishkin, Frederic S.: “Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (Spring 1997), 97-116.  Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, Ralph C.: “Alternative Rules for Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy in New Zealand: A Preliminary Assessment of Stabilization Properties,” Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper (July 1996).  Google Scholar
  6. Bryant, Ralph, Hooper, Peter, and Mann, Catherine, Eds.: Evaluating Policy Regimes: New Research in Empirical Macroeconomics, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution (1993).  Google Scholar
  7. Clarida, Richard, Jordi Gali, and Mark Gertler: (1999) “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature, 27 (December 1999), 1661-1707.  Google Scholar
  8. Croushore, Dean and Tom Stark: “A Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists,” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper no. 99-4 (June 1999).  Google Scholar
  9. Frankel, Jeffrey and Chinn, Menzie: “The Stabilizing Properties of a Nominal GNP Rule,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27 (May 1995), 318-34.  Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, Benjamin M. and Kuttner Kenneth N.: “A Price Target for U.S. Monetary Policy: Lesson from the Experience with Money Growth Targets,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity (1996:4), 77-125.  Google Scholar
  11. Fuhrer, Jeffrey C.: “The Phillips Curve is Alive and Well,” New England Economic Review, (March/April 1995), 41-56.  Google Scholar
  12. Hall, Robert E. and Mankiw, N. Gregory: “Nominal Income Targeting” in N. Gregory Mankiw, ed., Monetary Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1994), 71-93.  Google Scholar
  13. Henderson, Dale W. and McKibbin, Warren J.: “A Comparison of Some Basic Monetary Policy Regimes for Open Economies,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39 (1993), 221-317.  Google Scholar
  14. Jensen, Henrik: “Targeting Nominal Income Growth or Inflation?”, mimeo, University of Copenhagen, (June 1999).  Google Scholar
  15. Koenig, Evan F.: “Optimal Monetary Policy in an Economy with Sticky Wages,” Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Second Quarter (1995), 24-31.  Google Scholar
  16. McCallum, Bennett T.: “Robustness Properties of a Rule for Monetary Policy,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 29 (1988), 173-203.  Google Scholar
  17. McCallum, Bennett T.: “A Semi-Classical Model of Price Level Adjustment,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41 (1994), 251-284.  Google Scholar
  18. McCallum, Bennett T.: “New Zealand’s Monetary Policy Arrangements: Some Critical Issues,” Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion paper (June 1995a).  Google Scholar
  19. McCallum, Bennett T.: “Panel Discussion” in Goals, Guidelines, and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers, Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (1995b).  Google Scholar
  20. McCallum, Bennett T.: “Issues in the Design of Monetary Policy Rules, ”NBER Working Paper (6016), (1997a).  Google Scholar
  21. McCallum, Bennett T.: “The Alleged Instability of Nominal Income Targeting,” Reserve Bank of New Zealand Discussion Paper (August 1997b).  Google Scholar
  22. McCallum, Bennett T., and Edward Nelson: “An Optimizing IS-LM Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 31 (1999), 296-316.  Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, A. W.: “Stabilisation Policy and the Time-Forms of Lagged Responses,” Economic Journal, 67 (1957), 265-277.  Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, John M.: “New Keynesian Economics and the Phillips Curve,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27 (1995), 975-984.  Google Scholar
  25. Rogoff, Kenneth: “The Optimal Degree of Commitment to an Intermediate Monetary Target,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100 (1985), 1169-1189.  Google Scholar
  26. Rudebusch, Glenn D. and Lars Svensson, “Policy Rules for Inflation Targeting,” in John B. Taylor, ed., Monetary Policy Rules, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (1999), 203-246.  Google Scholar
  27. Svensson, Lars: “Price Level vs. Inflation Targeting: A Free Lunch?,” NBER Working Paper (5719), (August 1996).  Google Scholar
  28. Svensson, Lars: “Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets,” European Economic Review, 46 (1997a), 1111-1146.  Google Scholar
  29. Svensson, Lars: “Inflation Targeting: Some Extensions,” NBER Working Paper (5962), (March 1997b).  Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, John: “Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39 (1993), 195-214.  Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, John: “The Inflation/Output Trade-off Revisited,” in Goals, Guidelines, and Constraints Facing Monetary Policymakers, Boston: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (1995).  Google Scholar
  32. West, Kenneth D.:“Targeting Nominal Income: A Note,” Economic Journal, 96 December 1986), 1077-83.  Google Scholar
  33. Woodford, Michael: “Optimal Monetary Inertia,” NBER Working Paper (7261), (July 1999).  Google Scholar

Abstract

Alternative Monetary Policy Rules and the Specification of the Phillips Curve: A Comparison of Nominal Income with Strict Inflation Targeting

This paper shows that the instability of nominal income targeting in a simple backward-looking macro model disappears if the policymaker chooses to adopt a hybrid nominal income target, which is a special case of the optimal monetary policy. This form of nominal income targeting is compared to another form of optimal monetary policy, strict inflation targeting, so as to establish the conditions under which the former strategy is preferable to the latter. For most coefficient estimates reported in the literature hybrid nominal income targeting is likely to dominate strict inflation targeting as a strategy of monetary policy. We also analyze the two strategies of monetary policy using a forward-looking specification as our baseline model. In contrast to the policy frontier based on the backward-looking model, this policy frontier is not U-shaped; instead it implies a monotonic trade-off between the relevant parameters. In this model the strict inflation target becomes more attractive relative to the hybrid nominal income target as the Phillips Curve parameter increases in size. A strict inflation target is more likely to dominate a nominal income growth rate target than a hybrid nominal income target for certain values of the Phillips Curve parameter. (JEL E5)