Menu Expand

Banken, Aktionärsstruktur und Unternehmenssteuerung (Teil I)

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Schmid, F. Banken, Aktionärsstruktur und Unternehmenssteuerung (Teil I). Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 29(3), 402-427. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.29.3.402
Schmid, Frank A. "Banken, Aktionärsstruktur und Unternehmenssteuerung (Teil I)" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 29.3, 1996, 402-427. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.29.3.402
Schmid, Frank A. (1996): Banken, Aktionärsstruktur und Unternehmenssteuerung (Teil I), in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 29, iss. 3, 402-427, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.29.3.402

Format

Banken, Aktionärsstruktur und Unternehmenssteuerung (Teil I)

Schmid, Frank A.

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 29 (1996), Iss. 3 : pp. 402–427

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Frank A. Schmid, Philadelphia/USA

References

  1. Adams, M. (1989): Der Markt für Unternehmenskontrolle und sein Mißbrauch. Die Aktiengesellschaft 34, 33-3338.  Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. (1990): Höchststimmrechte, Mehrfachstimmrechte und sonstige wundersame Hindernisse auf dem Markt für Unternehmenskontrolle. Die Aktiengesellschaft 35, 62 - 78.  Google Scholar
  3. Allen, F. und Gale, D. (1995): A Welfare Comparison of the German and U.S. Financial Systems. European Economic Review 39, 179-209.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Banks, Shareholder Structure and Corporate Control (Part I)

This study investigates the impact of shareholder structure on firm performance. Two samples of large German stock corporations are analyzed. It can be shown that equity positions of banks have a positive impact on firm performance in 1974. In 1985, however, no impact of banks can be identified that goes beyond the positive influence of nonbank blockholders. The hypothesis is rejected that there has been no structural change between these two periods. An analysis of the banks’ supervisory board representation contradicts Edwards and Fischer (1994). These authors claim that the banks’ proxy voting does not translate into board seats held by banks. | This paper is to be published in two parts. This first part presents the hypotheses that are to be tested. Also, it defines the variables for the empirical analysis and it describes the dataset. The upcoming second part will present the empirical results.