Selektivität beim Zugang zu Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen. Die Bedeutung individueller und struktureller Determinanten am Beispiel der "Initiative zur Flankierung des Strukturwandels„
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Selektivität beim Zugang zu Weiterbildungsmaßnahmen. Die Bedeutung individueller und struktureller Determinanten am Beispiel der "Initiative zur Flankierung des Strukturwandels„
Osiander, Christopher | Fertig, Michael
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 135 (2015), Iss. 3 : pp. 279–306
4 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Christopher Osiander, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB) der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (BA), Regensburger Straße 104, 90478 Nürnberg
Michael Fertig, ISG Institut für Sozialforschung und Gesellschaftspolitik GmbH, Weinsbergstr. 190, 50825 Köln
Cited By
-
Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Gedächtnisforschung
Selektivität
Sebald, Gerd
2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26556-4_9 [Citations: 0] -
Lessons from mixed-method evaluations—An example from labor market research
Osiander, Christopher
Research Evaluation, Vol. 30 (2021), Iss. 1 P.90
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa016 [Citations: 1] -
Do Disadvantaged Young Adults Benefit Less from Social Investment? Studying Matthew Effects in Activation Measures
Knize, Veronika J. | Wolf, Markus | Zabel, CordulaYouth and Globalization, Vol. 3 (2021), Iss. 1 P.13
https://doi.org/10.1163/25895745-03010002 [Citations: 2] -
Determinanten der Weiterbildungsbereitschaft: Ergebnisse eines faktoriellen Surveys unter Arbeitslosen
Osiander, C. | Dietz, M.Journal for Labour Market Research, Vol. 49 (2016), Iss. 1 P.59
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-016-0202-4 [Citations: 5]
Abstract
This paper investigates the selectivity of vocational training courses on Germany"s labor market. We consider the case of a special program, which provides vocational training for low-skilled unemployed. We analyze the factors systematically determining the probability of participation in the training program. To this end, we use survey data from participants and a control group and combine it with administrative data. The empirical results suggest that persons with a relatively high attachment to the labor market are more likely to be allocated to the courses. Persons with longer regular employment spells or longer duration in the unemployment insurance system exhibit a significantly higher probability of participation. By contrast, receiving means-tested social benefits in the past reduce participation chances systematically. Some indicators for competencies also play a role: Computer skills and a good understanding of texts increase the probability of participation, external locus of control decreases it. In general, our results indicate selectivity towards ’good risks" in the program.