Menu Expand

Postkeynesianische Ökonomie

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Schmid, A. Postkeynesianische Ökonomie. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 13(2), 149-177. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.13.2.149
Schmid, Alfons "Postkeynesianische Ökonomie" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 13.2, 1980, 149-177. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.13.2.149
Schmid, Alfons (1980): Postkeynesianische Ökonomie, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 13, iss. 2, 149-177, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.13.2.149

Format

Postkeynesianische Ökonomie

Schmid, Alfons

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 13 (1980), Iss. 2 : pp. 149–177

Additional Information

Article Details

Schmid, Alfons

References

  1. Ambrosi, G. M. (1977): Ansatzpunkte einer neuen Keynesrezeption, „Wirtschaftsdienst“, Heft 9, S.475 ff.  Google Scholar
  2. Averitt, P. T. (1968): Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industry Structure, New York.  Google Scholar
  3. Blaug, M. (1974): The Cambridge Revolution, Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  4. Brunner, K., Monissen, H. G., Neumann, M. J. M. (Hrsg.) (1974): Geldtheorie, Köln.  Google Scholar
  5. Burbridge, J. B. (1978): Post-Keynesian Theory: The International Dimension, „Challenge“, November/Dezember 1978, S.40 ff.  Google Scholar
  6. Clower, R. W. (1969): Die Keynesianische Gegenrevolution: Eine theoretische Kritik, „Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik“, Bd. 99, S.8ff.  Google Scholar
  7. Clower, R. W. (1975): Reflections on the Keynesian Perplex, „Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie“, Bd. 35, S.2 ff.  Google Scholar
  8. Cornwall, J. (1978): Postkeynesian Theory: Macrodynamics, „Challenge“, Mai/Juni, S.11 ff.  Google Scholar
  9. Eichner, A. S. (1976): The Megacorp and Oligopoly: Microfoundations of Macro Dynamics, New York.  Google Scholar
  10. Eichner, A.S. (1978): Post-Keynesian Theory: An Introduction, „Challenge“, Mai/Juni, S.4 ff.  Google Scholar
  11. Eichner, A. S., Kregel, J. A, (1975): An Essay in Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigma in Economics, „Journal of Economic Literature“, Vol.13, S.1293 ff.  Google Scholar
  12. Galbraith, J. K. (1974): Economics and the Public Purpose, Norwich.  Google Scholar
  13. Harcourt, G. C. (1972): Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital, Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  14. Heller, W. W. (1967): New Dimensions of Political Economy, New York.  Google Scholar
  15. Kaldor, N. (1976): Alternative Verteilungstheorien, in: E. Schlicht (Hrsg.), Einführung in die Verteilungstheorie, Reinbeck bei Hamburg, S. 101 ff.  Google Scholar
  16. Kalecki, M. (1954): Selected Essays on the Dynamics of the Capitalistt Economy, Cambridge.  Google Scholar
  17. Kalecki, M. (1956): Theory of Economic Dynamics, London.  Google Scholar
  18. Kenyon, P. (1978): Pricing in Post-Keynesian Economics, „Challenge“, Juli/August, S.43 ff.  Google Scholar
  19. Kregel, J. A. (1973): Reconstruction of Political Economy: An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics, New York.  Google Scholar
  20. Kregel, J. A. (1976): Economic Methology in the Face of Uncertainly: The Modelling Methods of Keynes and the Post-Keynesians, „Economic Journal“, Vol.86, S.209 ff.  Google Scholar
  21. Kregel, J. A. (1978): Postkeynesian Theory: Income Distribution, „Challenge“, September/Oktober, S.37 ff.  Google Scholar
  22. Lachmann, L. (1975): Makroökonomischer Formalismus, Tübingen.  Google Scholar
  23. Leijonhufvud, A, (1973): Über Keynes und den Keynesianismus, Köln.  Google Scholar
  24. Lowe, A. (1965): Politische Ökonomik, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  25. Marris, R., Wood, A. (Hrsg.) (1974): The Corporate Economy, Cambridge Mass.  Google Scholar
  26. Moore, B. J. (1978): A Post-Keynesian Approach to Monetary Theory, „Challenge“, September/Oktober, S.44 ff.  Google Scholar
  27. Müller, G. u.a. (1978): Ökonomische Krisentendenzen im gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  28. Pasinetti, J. (1976): Der Zusammenhang zwischen Profitrate, Einkommensverteilung und wirtschaftlichem Wachstum, in: E. Schlicht (Hrsg.), Einführung in die Verteilungstheorie, Reinbek bei Hamburg, S.205 ff.  Google Scholar
  29. Riese, H. (1975): Politische Ökonomie oder mathematische Scholastik?, „Zeitschrift für Wirtschaft- und Sozialwissenschaften“, S. 193 ff.  Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, J. (1972): Die Akkumulation des Kapitals, Wien.  Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, J., Eatwell, J. (1977): Einführung in die Volkswirtschaftslehre, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  32. Shapiro, N. (1977): The Revolutionary Character of Post-Keynesian Economy, „Journal of Economic Issues“, Vol.11, S. 1541 ff.  Google Scholar
  33. Sraffa, P. (1976): Warenproduktion mittels Waren, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  34. Surrey, M. J. C. (1977): Economic Growth, Introductionary Note, In: J. J. C.  Google Scholar
  35. Surrey (Arsg.), Macroeconomic Themes, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  36. Vogt, W. (1973): Zur Kritik der herrschenden Wirtschaftstheorie, in: W. Vogt (Hrsg.) Seminar: Politische Ökonomie, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  37. Vogt, W. (Hrsg.) (1973): Seminar: Politische Ökonomie Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  38. Wood, A. (1975): A Theory of Profits, Cambridge.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Post-Keynesian Economics

Post-Keynesianism attempts to substantiate its own particular approach to economics. The object is to achieve this intention by further development of Keynesian macroeconomics and the elaboration of a “Keynesian microeconomics”. | The central point of departure is accentuation of the dominant position of the oligopolistic sector. This implies autonomy of investments and hence exogenous determination of the accumulation and profit rate. Endogenous variables are the degree of capacity utilization and the payroll-costs ratio. The mercantile power of the oligopoly makes it possible, via an autonomous price policy, to set up an internal fund serving to finance investments. Here the main emphasis is on mark-up pricing. On account of the long-range orientation of the oligopoly, expectations are of special significance. They govern the development of normal conceptions as to capacity utilization, price etc. This sort of normal conception forms the basis for analysis of business trends. Post-Keynesianism has developed no completely elaborated theory and policy as yet. It still considers itself to be a research programme. Consequently, for certain spheres, e.g. monetary theory, up to now there are only rudimentary drafts, so that for economic policy, too, no definitively formulated conceptions can be presented as yet. On the whole, post-Keynesianism is a promising approach to the analysis of real economic processes.