Menu Expand

Exakte Wohlfahrtsmaße in der Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Ahlheim, M., Wagenhals, G. Exakte Wohlfahrtsmaße in der Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 108(2), 169-193. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.108.2.169
Ahlheim, Michael and Wagenhals, Gerhard "Exakte Wohlfahrtsmaße in der Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 108.2, 1988, 169-193. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.108.2.169
Ahlheim, Michael/Wagenhals, Gerhard (1988): Exakte Wohlfahrtsmaße in der Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 108, iss. 2, 169-193, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.108.2.169

Format

Exakte Wohlfahrtsmaße in der Nutzen-Kosten-Analyse

Ahlheim, Michael | Wagenhals, Gerhard

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 108 (1988), Iss. 2 : pp. 169–193

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Ahlheim, Michael

Wagenhals, Gerhard

Cited By

  1. Nutzwert-Kosten-Analyse

    Schrifttum

    Rinza, Peter

    Schmitz, Heiner

    1992

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51504-0_9 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

During the last few years a number of exact welfare measures has been proposed. Such measures are highly interesting for applied cost-benefit-analysis, first, because they are based on logically consistent microeconomic foundations, second, because they use only empirically observable informations, and third, because they easily can be calculated. We analyze two typical representatives from this by now rather extensive class of welfare measures, viz the measures of McKenzie / Pearce and of Hammond. We show that both approaches have serious theoretical and empirical drawbacks. As an alternative, we propose a new exact welfare measure, based on the distance function, which is superior to the traditional measures in all respects.