Menu Expand

Mengenanpassung im kompetitiven Ungleichgewicht

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Heinrich, J. Mengenanpassung im kompetitiven Ungleichgewicht. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 98(3), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.3.311
Heinrich, Jürgen "Mengenanpassung im kompetitiven Ungleichgewicht" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 98.3, 1978, 311-326. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.3.311
Heinrich, Jürgen (1978): Mengenanpassung im kompetitiven Ungleichgewicht, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 98, iss. 3, 311-326, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.3.311

Format

Mengenanpassung im kompetitiven Ungleichgewicht

Heinrich, Jürgen

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 98 (1978), Iss. 3 : pp. 311–326

Additional Information

Article Details

Heinrich, Jürgen

References

  1. Alchian, A. A. (1970), Information Costs, Pricing, and Resource Unemployment. In: E. S. Phelps et al. (eds.), Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, New York.  Google Scholar
  2. Benassy, J.P. (1975), Neo-Keynesian Disequilibrium Theory in a Monetary Economy, Review of Economy Studies, Vol. 42, S. 503 - 523.  Google Scholar
  3. Clower, R. (1965), The Keynesian Counterrevolution: A Theoretical Appraisal. In: F. H. Hahn, F.P.R. Brechling (eds.), The Theory of Interest Rates, London, S. 103 - 125.  Google Scholar
  4. Grossman, H. (1972), Was Keynes a „Keynesian“?, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 10, S. 26 - 30. (1974), The Nature of Quantities in Market Disequilibrium, The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, S. 509 - 514.  Google Scholar
  5. Heinrich, J. (1978), Kompetitive Anpassungsprozesse, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Band 192.  Google Scholar
  6. Leijonhufvud, A. (1968), On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. A Study in Monetary Theory. New York.  Google Scholar
  7. Schreider, E. (1963), Über ein Problem der Preistheorie, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 91, S. 278 - 286.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Under the assumption of fixed disequilibrium prices the influence of realized and expected excess demand on supply and demand is analyzed. Assuming that the rationing scheme in disequilibrium will be such, that realized transactions are proportional to ordered and offered quantities, it is shown, that sellers and demanders order or offer quantities, which are bigger than notional quantities. Costs of ordering or offering limit the process of quantity-adjustments.