Menu Expand

Die kapitaltheoretische Kontroverse; Test zum Reswitching-Problem

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Krelle, W. Die kapitaltheoretische Kontroverse; Test zum Reswitching-Problem. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 98(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.1.1
Krelle, Wilhelm "Die kapitaltheoretische Kontroverse; Test zum Reswitching-Problem" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 98.1, 1978, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.1.1
Krelle, Wilhelm (1978): Die kapitaltheoretische Kontroverse; Test zum Reswitching-Problem, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 98, iss. 1, 1-31, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.98.1.1

Format

Die kapitaltheoretische Kontroverse; Test zum Reswitching-Problem

Krelle, Wilhelm

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 98 (1978), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–31

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Krelle, Wilhelm

Cited By

  1. Theorie des wirtschaftlichen Wachstums

    Schlußbetrachtungen: Phantasie und Wirklichkeit in der Wachstumstheorie

    Krelle, Wilhelm

    1985

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10444-6_14 [Citations: 0]
  2. Die Kapitalkontroverse heute

    Ötsch, Walter

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 112 (1992), Iss. 3 P.419

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.112.3.419 [Citations: 0]
  3. The Two Sides of Innovation

    Dynamic Circular Flow Models with Innovations

    Wagner, Adolf

    2013

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01496-8_12 [Citations: 2]

References

  1. Abraham-Frois, G. et E. Berrebi (1976), Progrès technique et théorie du capital, Referat beim Colloque International „Le capital dans la fonction de production", Université Paris X, Nanterre, 18 - 20 Novembre.  Google Scholar
  2. Brown, M. (1969), Substitution-Composition Effects, Capital-Intensity, Uniqueness and Growth, Economic Journal, 79, pp. 334 - 347.  Google Scholar
  3. Burmeister, E. and A. Dobell (1970), Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth, London.  Google Scholar
  4. Frerichs, W. and K. Kubier (1976), The Determination of Wage-Profit-Frontiers on the Basis of a Disaggregated Forecasting System for Germany, Discussion paper presented at the Eighth Annual Meeting of Project LINK, Venice, September 27 — October 1.  Google Scholar
  5. Garegnani, P. (1970), Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution, Review of Economic Studies, XXXVII, pp. 407 - 436.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The article states the basic macroeconomic facts which any capital theory should explain. The neoclassic approach as well as the approach of the "new capital theory" are presented and analysed in detail. These theories are supposed to explain the basic facts mentioned above. The neoclassic approach is a macroeconomic one, basically, the approach of the "new capital theory" a microeconomic one. The "new capital theory" shows that concave wage-profit curves as well as the reswitching of techniques is possible on the micro level - features which are impossible in the neoclassical theory. Stability considerations lead to the conclusion that on the macrolevel concave wage-profit curves should be considered with suspicion. Using theories of input-output tables for Germany the wage-profit curves for Germany have been calculated. These curves turn out to be convex and never cut twice.