Menu Expand

Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Müller, C., Penninger, J. Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik. Zeitschrift für Lebensrecht, 32(2), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfl.32.2.201
Müller, Christian and Penninger, Johannes "Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik" Zeitschrift für Lebensrecht 32.2, 2023, 201-214. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfl.32.2.201
Müller, Christian/Penninger, Johannes (2023): Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik, in: Zeitschrift für Lebensrecht, vol. 32, iss. 2, 201-214, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfl.32.2.201

Format

Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik

Müller, Christian | Penninger, Johannes

Zeitschrift für Lebensrecht, Vol. 32 (2023), Iss. 2 : pp. 201–214

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Prof. Dr. Christian Müller, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Ökonomische Bildung Münster, Deutschland

M. SC. Johannes Penninger, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Ökonomische Bildung Münster, Deutschland

Abstract

Social Ethics After Telos

In the social and academic discourse of social ethical issues, Catholic social teaching has fallen into a minority position. This article argues that there is an overriding reason for this: modern secular ethics has “lost” the idea of telos, the conviction that human beings do not determine themselves the meaning of their existence, but receive it. This change in the conception of man in modern ethics is analyzed with the help of Alasdair MacIntyre’s philosophical approach. Emotivism, non-naturalism and nominalism are discussed as the main theoretical consequences of this. It is argued that virtually all modern socio-ethical disputes can be traced back to differences in the telos question – from bioethical issues at the beginning and the end of human life to gender theory, antinatalism, and questions of the ethical evaluation of artificial intelligence. Ultimately, not only the postulate of human dignity, but also the existence of human rights in general depends on the assumption of a supra-individual telos of the human being.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Christian Müller und Johannes Penninger: Der Verlust des Telos in der Sozialethik 201
I. Einleitung 201
II. Der Mensch und sein Telos 201
III. Konsequenzen für die theoretische Sozialethik 205
1. Emotivismus 205
2. Non-Naturalismus 207
3. Nominalismus 208
IV. Konsequenzen für die praktische Sozialethik 209
Abstract 213
Schlagworte 214
Social Ethics After Telos 214
Keywords 214