Menu Expand

Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Raciti, G. Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano. Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, 39(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.3790/heist.39.1.133
Raciti, Giuseppe "Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano" Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani 39.1, 2023, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.3790/heist.39.1.133
Raciti, Giuseppe (2023): Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano, in: Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, vol. 39, iss. 1, 133-148, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/heist.39.1.133

Format

Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano

Raciti, Giuseppe

Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, Vol. 39 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 133–148

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Prof. Giuseppe Raciti, Università degli Studi di Catania, Dipartimento di Scienze Umanistiche Piazza Dante, 32 I-95124 Catania, Italy

References

  1. Badiou, Alain, Heidegger. L’être 3 – Figure du retrait 1986 – 1987, Paris: Fayard 2015.  Google Scholar
  2. Derrida, Jacques, Heidegger: la question de l’Être et l’Histoire. Cours de l’ENS-Ulm 1964 – 1965, Paris: Galilée 2013.  Google Scholar
  3. Falkenhayn, Katharina von, Augenblick und Kairos. Zeitlichkeit im Frühwerk Martin Heideggers, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot 2003 (Philosophische Schriften, Bd. 52).  Google Scholar
  4. Faye, Emmanuel, Heidegger, l’introduction du nazisme dans la philosophie: Autour des séminaires inédits de 1933 – 1935, Paris: Albin Michel 2005.  Google Scholar
  5. Grosser, Florian, Revolution Denken. Heidegger und das Politische 1919 bis 1969, München: C.H. Beck 2011.  Google Scholar
  6. Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von, Heidegger e ‘I problemi fondamentali della fenomenologia’. Sulla «seconda metà» di ‘Essere e tempo’, Bari: Levante 2014.  Google Scholar
  7. Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von, Transzendenz und Ereignis. Heideggers «Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis)». Ein Kommentar, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2019.  Google Scholar
  8. Hui, Yuk, On the Existence of Digital Objects, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2016.  Google Scholar
  9. Hui, Yuk, «Rhythm and Technics: On Heidegger’s Commentary on Rimbaud», in: Research in Phenomenology, XLVII (2017).  Google Scholar
  10. Kiesel, Theodor, The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Berkley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press 1995.  Google Scholar
  11. Krockow, Christian von, Die Entscheidung. Eine Untersuchung über Ernst Jünger, Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, Frankfurt am Main: Campus 1990.  Google Scholar
  12. Losurdo, Domenico, La comunità, la morte, l’Occidente. Heidegger e l’«ideologia della guerra», Torino: Bollati-Boringhieri 20012.  Google Scholar
  13. Lukács, György, Die Zerstörung der Vernunft. Irrationalismus und Imperialismus, Darmstadt-Neuwied: Luchterhand 1974.  Google Scholar
  14. MacNeill, William, The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press 1999.  Google Scholar
  15. Mcdaniel, Kris, «Heidegger and the ‘There Is’ of Being», in: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XCIII (2016).  Google Scholar
  16. Sheehan, Thomas, Dasein, in: Hubert L. Dreyfus, Mark A. Wrathall [eds.], A Companion to Heidegger, New Jersey: Blackwell 2005.  Google Scholar
  17. Sheehan, Thomas, La Kehre a Marburgo, in: Eugenio Mazzarella (a cura di), Heidegger a Marburgo 1923 – 1928, Genova: Melangolo 2006.  Google Scholar
  18. Trawny, Peter, Heidegger-Fragmente. Eine philosophische Biographie, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer 2018.  Google Scholar
  19. Trawny, Peter, Heidegger. A Critical Introduction, Cambridge (UK): Polity Press 2019.  Google Scholar
  20. Treiber, Gerhard, Das Entscheidungsproblem bei Kierkegaard, Jaspers, Heidegger, Sartre, Camus. Literarische Erkundungen bei Kundera, Céline, Broch, Musil, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2000.  Google Scholar
  21. Van Buren, John, The Young Heidegger. Rumor of the Hidden King, Bloomington-Indianapolis: Indiana University Press 1994.  Google Scholar
  22. Ward, Koral, Augenblick. The Concept of the ‘Decisive Moment’ in 19th- and 20th-Century Western Philosophy, Aldershot: Ashgate 2008.  Google Scholar
  23. Žižek, Slavoj, In Defense of Lost Causes, London-New-York: Verso 2008.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Novas Repeto Vias. A Note on Heidegger and Time

This essay begins from the observation that a “theory of time” contradicts the Heideggerian intention to experience temporality based on a “pre-theoretical” condition and to emancipate it in this way from instances of the Western metaphysical discourse. Such a claim leads to the conclusion that Heidegger never elaborated a theory of time and therefore was never, strictly speaking, “a philosopher of time.” Thus, the necessary condition for releasing thought from the metaphysical mortgage would have to pass through the deconstruction of any “concept” intended to exhaust the nature of time. This gives rise to implications of varying intensity with respect to the structure and functions of Dasein. Most importantly, it concerns the tension between Entschlossenheit and Augenblick, on which Heidegger’s structure of Dasein depends.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Giuseppe Raciti: Il tempo è raro. Una nota sulla struttura del Dasein heideggeriano 133
La posizione del problema 133
Possibilità e realtà 134
Il tempo è raro 137
Rivoluzione e Zeit-Raum 140
Scelta e decisione 142
Novas repeto vias 145
Bibliography 147
Abstract 148
Novas Repeto Vias. A Note on Heidegger and Time 148