Menu Expand

The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Kaushal, L. The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects. Applied Economics Quarterly, 68(2), 95-124. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.2022.1418302
Kaushal, Leena Ajit "The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects" Applied Economics Quarterly 68.2, 2022, 95-124. https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.2022.1418302
Kaushal, Leena Ajit (2022): The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects, in: Applied Economics Quarterly, vol. 68, iss. 2, 95-124, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.2022.1418302

Format

The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects

Kaushal, Leena Ajit

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 68 (2022), Iss. 2 : pp. 95–124

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Management Development Institute Gurgaon, Block C, Sukhrali, Sector 17, Gurugram, Haryana 122007 India.

References

  1. Adhikary, B. K. (2017): “Factors influencing foreign direct investment in South Asian economies: A comparative analysis,” South Asian Journal of Business Studies 6(1), 8–37.  Google Scholar
  2. Aigner, D./Lovell, C. K./Schmidt, P. (1977): “Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models,” Journal of Econometrics 6(1), 21–37.  Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. E. (1979): “A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation,” The American Economic Review 69(1), 106–116.  Google Scholar
  4. Apanisile, O. T./Oloba, O. M. (2020): “Asymmetric effect of exchange rate changes on cross-border trade in Nigeria,” Future Business Journal 6(1), 1–9.  Google Scholar
  5. Atif, R. M./Mahmood, H./Haiyun, L./Mao, H. (2019): “Determinants and efficiency of Pakistan’s chemical products’ exports: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model,” PloS one 14(5), e0217210.  Google Scholar
  6. Barad, K./Singhania A. (2022): “Decoding India-UAE CEPA: Can it provide the roadmap for $100 billion in trade over the next 5 years,” The Economic Times, May 2.  Google Scholar
  7. Basu, P./Ray, P. (2021): “China-plus-one: expanding global value chains,” Journal of Business Strategy 43(6), 350–356.  Google Scholar
  8. Battese, G. E./Coelli, T. J. (1988): “Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data,” Journal of Econometrics, 38(3), 387–399.  Google Scholar
  9. Battese, G. E./Coelli, T. J. (1992): “Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India,” Journal of productivity analysis 3(1), 153–169.  Google Scholar
  10. Bezuidenhout, H./Mhonyera, G./Van Rensburg, J./Sheng, H. H./Carrera, J. M./Cui, X. (2021): “Emerging Market Global Players: The Case of Brazil, China and South Africa,” Sustainability13(21), 12234.  Google Scholar
  11. Bhagwati, J. (2008): “Termites in the trading system: How preferential agreements undermine free trade,” Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Bhat, S. A./Bhat, J. A. (2021): “Impact of exchange rate changes on the trade balance of India: an asymmetric nonlinear cointegration approach,” Foreign Trade Review 56(1), 71–88.  Google Scholar
  13. Bhattacharyya, R./Mukherjee, J. (2014): “Do exchange rates affect exports in India,” South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 3(2), 175–193.  Google Scholar
  14. Bibi, Z.,/Khan, D. (2021): “Technical and environmental efficiency of agriculture sector in South Asia: A stochastic frontier analysis approach,” Environment, Development, and Sustainability 23(6), 9260–9279.  Google Scholar
  15. Buckley, P. J./Driffield, N./Kim, J. Y. (2022): “The Role of Outward FDI in Creating Korean Global Factories,” Management International Review 62(1), 27–52.  Google Scholar
  16. Chakraborty, D./Chaisse, J./Xu, Q. I. A. N. (2019): “Is it finally time for India’s free trade agreements? the ASEAN Present and the RCEP Future,” Asian Journal of International Law 9(2), 359–391.  Google Scholar
  17. Chatterjee, S./Subramanian, A. (2020): “India’s Inward (Re)turn: Is it Warranted? Will it Work?”, Ashoka Center for Economic Policy Policy Paper 01.  Google Scholar
  18. Chen, M. X. (2009). “Regional economic integration and geographic concentration of multinational firms,” European Economic Review 53(3), 355–375.  Google Scholar
  19. Crawford, J. A./Fiorentino, R. V. (2005): ”The changing landscape of regional trade agreements,” WTO Discussion Paper 8.  Google Scholar
  20. Dadakas, D. /Ghazvini K. S./Fargher, S. (2020): “Examining the trade potential of the UAE using a gravity model and a Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator,” The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 29(5), 619–646.  Google Scholar
  21. Dau, L. A./Moore, E. M./Doh, J. P./Soto, M. A. (2021): “Does global integration stimulate corporate citizenship? The effect of international trade agreements and regulatory quality on state and private firm adoption of CSR standards,” Journal of International Business Policy, 1–25.  Google Scholar
  22. Deloitte (2016): “FTA utilization – An opportunity in waiting for Indian industry,” Deloitte Report, retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/tax/tax-2016/in-tax-deloitte-fta-utilization-noexp.pdf.  Google Scholar
  23. Dhingra, S./Freeman R./Huang H. (2021): “The impact of deep trade agreements on trade and welfare”, LSE Centre for Economics Discussion Paper 1742.  Google Scholar
  24. Di Ubaldo, M./Gasiorek, M. (2022): “Non-trade provisions in trade agreements and FDI,” European Journal of Political Economy 75, 102208.  Google Scholar
  25. Ding, H./Koedijk, K. G./Li, C./Qi, T. (2021): “The internationalization of Chinese firms: Impact of FDI experience on export performance,” The World Economy 44(12), 3609–3640.  Google Scholar
  26. Duong, M./Holmes, M. J./Strutt, A. (2021): “The impact of free trade agreements on FDI inflows: the case of Vietnam,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 26(3), 483–505.  Google Scholar
  27. Ebaidalla, E. M./Ali, M. E. M. (2022): “Assessing Intra-Arab Trade Integration and Potential: Evidence from the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model,” The International Trade Journal 37(2), 1–19.  Google Scholar
  28. Fiorini, M./Sanfilippo, M./Sundaram, A. (2021): “Trade liberalization, roads and firm productivity,” Journal of Development Economics 153, 102712.  Google Scholar
  29. Gamso, J./Grosse, R. (2021): “Trade agreement depth, foreign direct investment, and the moderating role of property rights,” Journal of International Business Policy 4(2), 308–325. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/wtr11-2c_e.pdf.  Google Scholar
  30. Glaeser, E. L./Kohlhase, J. E. (2004): “Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs,” in: Fifty Years of Regional Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 197–228.  Google Scholar
  31. Jana, S. S./Sahu, T. N./Pandey, K. D. (2020): “How far is FDI relevant to India’s foreign trade growth, An empirical investigation,” Journal of Economic Structures 9(1), 1–19.  Google Scholar
  32. Jiang, W./Zhang, H./Lin, Y. (2022): “Trade sustainability and efficiency under the belt and road initiative: A stochastic frontier analysis of China’s trade potential at industry level,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 58(6), 1740–1752.  Google Scholar
  33. Kalirajan, K./Paudel, R. (2015): “India’s trade deficit with China: Will free trade agreement (FTA) work for India,” Global Economy Journal 15(4), 485–505.  Google Scholar
  34. Kant, A. (2021): “Exports: India’s Window of Opportunity and Growth for Future,” retrieved from: https://www.niti.gov.in/exports-indias-window-opportunity-growth-future.  Google Scholar
  35. Kelkar, R./Kalirajan, K. (2021): “Has India achieved its potential in merchandise exports,” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 26(2), 271–292.  Google Scholar
  36. Krishna, P. (2021): “India’s Free Trade Agreements,” Indian Public Policy Review 2(2), 1–12.  Google Scholar
  37. Kumbhakar, S. C./Wang, H./Horncastle, A. P. (2015): A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata, Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Lawrence, R. Z. (1996): Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.  Google Scholar
  39. Lazo, R. P./Sauve, P. (2018): “The treatment of regulatory convergence in preferential trade agreements,” World Trade Review 17(4), 575–607.  Google Scholar
  40. Lerner, A. P. (1936): “The Symmetry Between Import and Export Taxes,” Economica 3(11), 306–313.  Google Scholar
  41. Li, X./Meng, B./Wang, Z. (2019): “Recent patterns of global production and GVC participation,” Global Value Chain Development Report 9.  Google Scholar
  42. Liu, J./Wang, X./Guo, J. (2021): “Port efficiency and its influencing factors in the context of Pilot Free Trade Zones,” Transport Policy 105, 67–79.  Google Scholar
  43. Ly-My, D./Lee, H. H./Khan, F. (2022): “Does aid for trade contribute to M&A FDI flows to developing countries?” Empirical Economics 63, 697–723.  Google Scholar
  44. Maciejewski, M./Wach, K. (2019): “What determines export structure in the EU countries? The use of gravity model in international trade based on the panel data for the years 1995–2015,” Journal of International Studies 12(1).  Google Scholar
  45. Malik, I. A./Mir, M. A. (2014): “India’s trade potential with central Asia: an application of gravity model analysis,” International Journal on World Peace 31(3), 53.  Google Scholar
  46. Matallah, M. A.A./Benmehaia, M. A./Benmebarek, A. (2021): “Agricultural exports and potentials of Algeria: An econometric investigation through gravity model,” International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 14(3), 319–335.  Google Scholar
  47. Mattoo, A./Mulabdic, A./Ruta, M. (2022): “Trade creation and trade diversion in deep agreements,” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Économique 55(3), 1598–1637.  Google Scholar
  48. Mattoo, A./Rocha, N./Ruta, M. (Eds.) (2020): “Handbook of deep trade agreements,” World Bank Publications, World Bank, Washington, D.C.  Google Scholar
  49. Maudos, J./Pastor, J. M./Serrano, L. (2003): “Human capital in OECD countries: technical change, efficiency and productivity,” International Review of Applied Economics 17(4), 419–435.  Google Scholar
  50. Maur J. C. (2014): “Deep Integration in Preferential Trade Agreements,” retrieved from: https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680405.001.0001/acprof-9780199680405-chapter-17.  Google Scholar
  51. McKinsey (2020): “A New Growth Formulae for Manufacturing in India,” McKinsey Report, retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/advanced-electronics/our-insights/a-new-growth-formula-for-manufacturing-in-india.  Google Scholar
  52. Mikic, M. (2011): “Are the India’s trade agreements deep enough to support production networks? India: A New Player in Asian Production Networks,” ESCAP Studies in Trade and Investment, 120–136.  Google Scholar
  53. Mohanty, S./Sethi, N. (2021): “Does inward FDI lead to export performance in India? An empirical investigation,” Global Business Review 22(5), 1174–1189.  Google Scholar
  54. Nchofoung, T. N./Asongu, S. A. (2022): “Effects of infrastructures on environmental quality contingent on trade openness and governance dynamics in Africa,” Renewable Energy 189, 152–163.  Google Scholar
  55. Nguyen, D. D. (2020): “Determinants of Vietnam’s rice and coffee exports: using stochastic frontier gravity model,” Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 29(1), 19–34.  Google Scholar
  56. Nicita, A./Olarreaga, M./Silva, P. (2018): “Cooperation in WTO’s tariff waters?” Journal of Political Economy 126(3), 1302–1338.  Google Scholar
  57. Nishijima, S. (2021): “Japan, Regional Integration, and the Pacific Rim,” in: Cooperation or Rivalry? Regional Integration in the Americas and the Pacific Rim, Routledge, 173–191.  Google Scholar
  58. Nottage, L./Malbon, J./Paterson, J./Beaton-Wells, C. (2019): ASEAN Consumer Law Harmonisation and Cooperation: Achievements and Challenges, Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  59. OECD (2019): Challenges and opportunities of India’s enhanced participation in the global economy, OECD Report, retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/04b94da4-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/04b94da4-en.  Google Scholar
  60. Osnago, A./Piermartini, R./Rocha, N. (2018): “The heterogeneous effects of trade policy uncertainty: How much do trade commitments boost trade,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8567.  Google Scholar
  61. Osnago, A./Rocha, N./Ruta, M. (2019): “Deep trade agreements and vertical FDI: The devil is in the details. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Èconomique,” 52(4), 1558–1599.  Google Scholar
  62. Panagariya, A. (2003): “South Asia: does preferential trade liberalisation make sense,” World Economy, 26(9), 1279–1291.  Google Scholar
  63. PIB (2021): “Contribution of MSMEs to GDP,” Press Information Bureau, retrieved from: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1744032.  Google Scholar
  64. Rangarajan, C./Kannan, R. (2017): “Determinants of India’s exports,” Journal of Quantitative Economics15(3), 629–646.  Google Scholar
  65. Ratna, R. S. (2020): “Three decades of SAARC and the unfinished agenda of regional integration,” In: Trade and Regional Integration in South Asia, Springer, Singapore, 33–44.  Google Scholar
  66. Sen, A. (2021): “CEPA Review: India wants pact revision; Japan proposes corrections within existing framework,” retrieved from: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/cepa-review-india-wants-pact-revision-japan-proposes-corrections-within-existing-framework/article33942744.ece.  Google Scholar
  67. Singh, L. B. (2021): “Impact of India-ASEAN free trade agreement: An assessment from the trade creation and trade diversion effects,” Foreign Trade Review 56(4), 400–414.  Google Scholar
  68. Stevens, C. (1993): “Harmonization, Trade, and the Environment,” International Environmental Affairs 5(1), 42–49.  Google Scholar
  69. Thangavelu, S. M./Urata, S./Ambaw, D. T. (2021): “FDI activities and integration in ASEAN and East Asia,” in: Handbook on East Asian Economic Integration, Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  70. The Economic Times, (2022): “Decoding India-UAE CEPA: Can it provide the roadmap for $100 billion in trade over the next 5 years,” retrieved from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/trade/exports/insights/decoding-india-uae-cepa-can-it-provide-the-roadmap-for-100-billion-in-trade-over-the-next-5-years/articleshow/91249354.cms.  Google Scholar
  71. The Hindu (2022): “India discusses trade barriers with South Korea,” The Hindu, retrieved from: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/india-discusses-trade-barriers-with-south-korea/article38241032.ece.  Google Scholar
  72. The Print (2021): “Trade imbalances, then pandemic – why the Modi government changed strategy on free trade agreements,” retrieved from: https://theprint.in/economy/trade-imbalances-then-pandemic-why-modi-govt-changed-strategy-on-free-trade-agreements/749740/.  Google Scholar
  73. The World Trade Report (2011): “The WTO and preferential trade agreements: From co-existence to coherence,” retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/wtr11-2c_e.pdf.  Google Scholar
  74. Udemba, E. N./Güngör, H./Bekun, F. V./Kirikkaleli, D. (2021): “Economic performance of India amidst high CO2 emissions,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 52–60.  Google Scholar
  75. Varghese, P. (2018): “An India economic strategy to 2035,” Report to the Australian Government, retrieved from: https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/aic-ies-snapshot-summary.pdf.  Google Scholar
  76. Wahyuningsih, D. (2021): “Trade flow of manufacturing sector and foreign direct investment in ASEAN economic integration: the gravity model of trade,” Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah 8(6), 619–630.  Google Scholar
  77. Wolf, M./Kalish, I. (2021): “Supply chain resilience in the face of geopolitical risks: Preparing for the tumult ahead,” Deloitte Insights, retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/us-china-trade-war-supply-chain.html.  Google Scholar
  78. World Bank (2018): “Regional Trade Agreements”, retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/regional-trade-agreements.  Google Scholar
  79. Zahid, H./Bashir, M. F./Tahir, M. (2021): “Relationship between Preferential Trade Agreements and Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from a Panel of 147 Countries,” The International Trade Journal 35(6): 523–539.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Expected gains guide the decision to join trade agreements (TAs). While it is difficult to predict whether the ongoing trade war will result in a significant shift in the global trade paradigm, India’s renewed interest in TAs with numerous developed economies, as well as worsening trade balances with existing TA partners, necessitates a review of India’s current TAs before negotiating new ones. Using a stochastic frontier gravity model, the study evaluates the impact of RTAs (free and preferential; deep and shallow) on India’s export efficiency from 2002 to 2020. The paper also investigates how TA affected Indian exports during the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020. The findings demonstrate that India’s preferential and shallow TAs had a maximum export efficiency of 55% between 2002 and 2020. Moreover, shallow TAs demonstrated their resilience in encouraging Indian exports in 2020. Findings reveal that India has failed to fully leverage its deep TAs, which are critical for stimulating commerce, investment, and economic growth. As a result, India must safeguard its interests during the ongoing deep trade talks by focusing on non-tariff barriers and rules of origin to promote exports and harmonize regulatory standards to facilitate FDI-led integration into global GVCs to boost export potential.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Leena Ajit Kaushal: The Changing Landscape of India’s Regional Trade Agreements: Realities and Prospects 95
1. Introduction 95
2. History of India’s Regional Trade Agreements 98
3. Theoretical Framework and Methodology 102
4. Empirical Findings and Discussion 104
Technical Efficiency Analysis 109
Trade Deficit Analysis 110
Export Efficiency During the COVID-19 Economic Downturn 113
Robustness Check 114
5. Conclusion 116
References 117
Appendix 122