Menu Expand

Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Gockel, M., Kunz, M. Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik. Jahrbuch Wissenschaftsfreiheit, 1(1), 313-317. https://doi.org/10.3790/jwf.2024.1432201
Gockel, Matthias and Kunz, Marco "Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik" Jahrbuch Wissenschaftsfreiheit 1.1, 2024, 313-317. https://doi.org/10.3790/jwf.2024.1432201
Gockel, Matthias/Kunz, Marco (2024): Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik, in: Jahrbuch Wissenschaftsfreiheit, vol. 1, iss. 1, 313-317, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/jwf.2024.1432201

Format

Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik

Gockel, Matthias | Kunz, Marco

Jahrbuch Wissenschaftsfreiheit, Vol. 1(2024), Iss. 1 : pp. 313–317

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Matthias Gockel lehrt systematische Theologie an der Universität Basel.

Marco Kunz ist Professor für spanische Literaturwissenschaft an der Universität Lausanne.

Abstract

Holded freedom? A book criticism

Our contribution offers a criticism of the book offended freedom. Aspects of the libertarian authoritarianism by Carolin Amlinger and Oliver Nachtwey. The book is based on qualitative interviews, especially with supporters of the "cross-thinking scene". We outline his history and shed light on the methodological approach as well as accompanying statements by the author and the author after the publication. There are considerable doubts as to whether the impartiality with which such a study should have been carried out remained. The impression arises that Amlinger and Nachwey do not generate any new knowledge about “lateral thinkers”, but above all write a book against “lateral thinkers” and themselves distribute authoritarian thinking patterns in order to disavow criticism. This finding deserves further attention, since the book with its striking claims does not remain in the academic department, but aims at influencing public discourse.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Bemerkungen zu Literatur 313
Matthias Gockel / Marco Kunz\r: Gekränkte Freiheit? Eine Buchkritik 313
I. 314
II. 315
III. Fazit 316