Menu Expand

Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik

  1. Journals
  2. Society & Social Sciences
  3. Sozialer Fortschritt
  4. Vol. 73, Issue 6-7
  5. pp. 501–521

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Cremer, J., Bohnenberger, K. Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik. Sozialer Fortschritt, 73(6-7), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.144205
Cremer, Julia C. and Bohnenberger, Katharina "Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik" Sozialer Fortschritt 73.6-7, 2024, 501-521. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.144205
Cremer, Julia C./Bohnenberger, Katharina (2024): Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 73, iss. 6-7, 501-521, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.144205
Format
Download

Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik

Cremer, Julia C. | Bohnenberger, Katharina

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 73 (2024), Iss. 6-7 : pp. 501–521

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.144205
Language
German
Pages
21

Pricing

Individual
€ 15.90 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Cremer, Julia C., Universität Duisburg-Essen, Institut für Sozioökonomie, Forsthausweg 2, 47057 Duisburg.

Bohnenberger, Katharina, Deutsches Institut für Interdisziplinäre Sozialpolitikforschung (DIFIS), Universität Bremen – SOCIUM, Mary-Somerville-Straße 7, 28359 Bremen.

References

  1. Adloff, F./Neckel, S. (2019): Futures of Sustainability as Modernization, Transformation, and Control: A Conceptual Framework, Sustainability Science 14(4).  Google Scholar
  2. Bohnenberger, K. (2023): Peaks and Gaps in Eco-Social Policy and Sustainable Welfare: A Systematic Literature Map of the Research Landscape, European Journal of Social Security 25(4): p. 328–46.  Google Scholar
  3. Bohnenberger, K./Fritz, M./Mundt, I./Riousset, P. (2021): Die Vertretung ökologischer Interessen in der Sozialpolitik: Konflikt- oder Kooperationspotential in einer Transformation zur Nachhaltigkeit? Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 67(2): S. 89–121.  Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, California.  Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, P./Ernst, A./Gralla, F./Luederitz, C./Lang, D. J./Newig, J./Reinert, F./Abson D. J./von Wehrden, H. (2013): A Review of Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science, Ecological Economics 92: p. 1–15.  Google Scholar
  6. Braun, V./Clarke, V. (2006): Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): p. 77–101.  Google Scholar
  7. Carstensen, M. B./Schmidt, V. A. (2016): Power through, over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism, Journal of European Public Policy 23(3): p. 318–37.  Google Scholar
  8. Cremer, J. C. (2024): Collective Actors and Potential Alliances for Eco-social Policies in Germany, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft (ZPol) – Journal of Political Science.  Google Scholar
  9. Flick, U. (2009): An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed), Los Angeles.  Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (2000): Power, New York.  Google Scholar
  11. Gough, I. (2015): Climate change and sustainable welfare: The centrality of human needs, Cambridge Journal of Economics 39(5): p. 1191–1214.  Google Scholar
  12. Green, F./Healy, N. (2022): How Inequality Fuels Climate Change: The Climate Case for a Green New Deal, One Earth 5(6): p. 635–49.  Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1973): What does a crisis mean today? Legitimation Problems in Late Capitalism, Social Research, 40(4).  Google Scholar
  14. Hennink, M./Hutter, I./Bailey, A. (2019): Qualitative research methods (2nd ed), Thousand Oaks.  Google Scholar
  15. Hirvilammi, T./Häikiö, L./Johansson, H./Koch, M./Perkiö, J. (2023): Social Policy in a Climate Emergency Context: Towards an Ecosocial Research Agenda, Journal of Social Policy 52(1): p. 1–23.  Google Scholar
  16. IPCC (2021): Summary for Policymakers, In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  Google Scholar
  17. Jakobsson, N./Muttarak, R./Schoyen, M. A. (2018): Dividing the pie in the eco-social state: Exploring the relationship between public support for environmental and welfare policies, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2): p. 313–39.  Google Scholar
  18. Jakopovich, D. (2009): Uniting to Win: Labor-Environmental Alliances, Capitalism Nature Socialism 20(2): p. 4–96.  Google Scholar
  19. Koch, M. (2018): Sustainable Welfare, Degrowth and Eco-Social Policies in Europe, in: Vanhercke, B./Ghailani, D./Sabato, S. (eds.), Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2018, Brussels.  Google Scholar
  20. Koch, M./Gullberg, A. T./Schoyen, M. A./Hvinden, B. (2016): Sustainable welfare in the EU: Promoting synergies between climate and social policies, Critical Social Policy 36(4): p. 704–15.  Google Scholar
  21. Laclau, E./Mouffe, C. (1985): Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics, New York.  Google Scholar
  22. Lamb, W. F./Mattioli, G./Levi, S./Roberts, T. J./Capstick, S./Creutzig, F./Minx, J. C./Müller-Hansen, F./Culhane, T./Steinberger, J. K. (2020): Discourses of climate delay, Global Sustainability 3: p. 6–10.  Google Scholar
  23. Lindellee, J./Olsson, J. A./Koch, M. (2021): Operationalizing sustainable welfare and co-developing eco-social policies by prioritizing Human Needs, Global Social Policy 21(2): p. 328–32.  Google Scholar
  24. Nitsche-Whitfield, P. (2022): A labour-nature alliance for a social-ecological transformation, Transfer 28(3): p. 383–7.  Google Scholar
  25. Petschow, U./Sharp, H./Riousset, P./Jacob, K./Guske, A.-L./Kalt, G./Schipperges, M./Arlt, H.-J. (2021): Potenziale, Hemmnisse und Perspektiven neuer Allianzen für sozialökologische Transformationen, Umweltbundesamt (Hrsg.), UBA-Texte 134/2021, Dessau-Roßlau.  Google Scholar
  26. Polewsky, M./Hankammer, S./Kleer, R./Antons, D. (2024): Degrowth vs. Green Growth. A Computational Review and Interdisciplinary Research Agenda, Ecological Economics 217.  Google Scholar
  27. Preunkert, J. (2022): European Monetary Policy: Between Market Neutrality and Climate Change, Culture, Practice & Europeanization 7(2): p. 192–208.  Google Scholar
  28. Räthzel, N./Uzzell, D. (2011): Trade unions and climate change: The jobs versus environment dilemma, Global Environmental Change 21(4): p. 1215–23.  Google Scholar
  29. Rehm, M./Huwe, V./Bohnenberger, K. (2022): Klimasoziale Transformation – Klimaschutz und Ungleichheitsreduktion wirken Hand in Hand, Bertelsmann Stiftung (Hrsg.), Gütersloh.  Google Scholar
  30. Saurugger, S. (2013): Constructivism and Public Policy Approaches in the EU: From Ideas to Power Games, Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): p. 888–906.  Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, V. A. (2008): Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse, Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): p. 303–26.  Google Scholar
  32. Schmidt, V. A. (2011): Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation, Critical Policy Studies 5(2): p. 106–26.  Google Scholar
  33. Schmidt, V. A. (2015): Discursive institutionalism: understanding policy in context, in: Fischer, F./Torgerson, D./Durnová, A./Orsini, M. (eds.): Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, Cheltenham.  Google Scholar
  34. Umweltbundesamt (2023): Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2022 – Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage, Dessau-Roßlau.  Google Scholar
  35. Wolf, I./Ebersbach, B./Huttarsch, J.-H. (2023): Soziales Nachhaltigkeitsbarometer der Energie- und Verkehrswende 2023, Was die Menschen in Deutschland bewegt – Ergebnisse einer Panelstudie zu den Themen Energie und Verkehr, Kopernikus-Projekt Ariadne (Hrsg.), Potsdam.  Google Scholar
  36. Zahariadis, N. (2003): Ambiguity and choice in public policy: Political decision making in modern democracies, Washington, DC.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Ideas and Lines of Conflict in German Discourse on Alliance Building for Eco-Social Policies

Although strategic cooperation between environmental and social interest groups has increased, societal conflicts over socio-ecological transformation are on the rise. This paper examines implicit lines of conflict among actors in the discourse at the climate and social policy interface. From a discursive institutionalist perspective, we identify five underlying ideas based on expert interviews: climate-centered, social-centered, compensatory, investive, and transformative. We discuss these ideas based on central characteristics and interpret them regarding potential developments. We identify distributional conflicts as central lines of conflict, yet their addressing has been avoided. We show that the debate is currently deadlocked, but the transformative idea signals a potential ideational change.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Julia C. Cremer / Katharina Bohnenberger: Ideen und Konfliktlinien im deutschen Diskurs zur Bildung von Allianzen für eine integrierte Klima- und Sozialpolitik 501
Zusammenfassung 501
Abstract: Ideas and Lines of Conflict in German Discourse on Alliance Building for Eco-Social Policies 501
1. Einleitung 502
2. Theoretischer Rahmen 503
2.1 Problemverständnis 504
2.2 Sinngebung 505
2.3 Umsetzung 505
3. Daten und Methodik 506
4. Ergebnisse 508
4.1 Problemdefinition 510
4.2 Sinngebung 511
4.3 Umsetzung 512
5. Interpretation 515
6. Fazit 518
Literatur 519

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.