Menu Expand

„Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Schüring, E., Wiebe, N. „Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme. Sozialer Fortschritt, 73(11), 809-828. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.1450104
Schüring, Esther and Wiebe, Nicola "„Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme" Sozialer Fortschritt 73.11, 2024, 809-828. https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.1450104
Schüring, Esther/Wiebe, Nicola (2024): „Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme, in: Sozialer Fortschritt, vol. 73, iss. 11, 809-828, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.2024.1450104

Format

„Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme

Schüring, Esther | Wiebe, Nicola

Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 73 (2024), Iss. 11 : pp. 809–828

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Schüring, Prof. Dr. Esther, Projektleiterin Sektorvorhaben Soziale Sicherung, GIZ, Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 32 + 36, 53113 Bonn.

Wiebe, Nicola, Referentin internationale Sozialpolitik, Brot für die Welt/Abteilung Politik, Evangelisches Werk für Diakonie und Entwicklung e.V., Caroline-Michaelis-Str. 1, 10115 Berlin.

References

  1. Addati, L./Cattaneo, U./Pozzan, E. (2022): Care at Work: Investing in care leave and services for a more gender equal world of work, International Labour Organization, Geneva.  Google Scholar
  2. Antonopoulos, R. (o.J.): Social Protection for Women, UN Chronicle, https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/social-protection-women [27.2.2024].  Google Scholar
  3. Baranov, V./Cameron, L./Suarez, D. C./Thibout, C. (2021): Theoretical Underpinnings and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Cash Transfers on Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, The Journal of Development Studies, 57(1): p. 1–25.  Google Scholar
  4. Bossuroy, T./Goldstein, M./Karimou, B./Karlan, D./Kazianga, H./Parienté, W./Premand, P./Thomas, C./Udry, C./Vaillant, J./Wright, K. (2022): Tackling Psychosocial and Capital Constraints to Alleviate Poverty, Nature, 605: p. 291–297.  Google Scholar
  5. Botea, I./Coudouel, A./Heinemann, A./Kuttner, S. (2021): Safety First: How to Leverage Social Safety Nets to Prevent Gender Based Violence, Washington D.C., World Bank.  Google Scholar
  6. Charmes, J. (2022): Variety and change of patterns in the gender balance between unpaid care work, paid work and free time across the world and over time: A measure of wellbeing, in: Wellbeing, Space and Society, Volume 3, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.wss.2022.100081.  Google Scholar
  7. Corliss, H. L./Goodenow, C. S./Nichols, L./Austin, S. B. (2011): High burden of homelessness among sexual-minority adolescents: findings from a representative Massachusetts high school sample, in: Am J Public Health 101(9): S. 1683–1689, doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300155.  Google Scholar
  8. Curry, F. (2019): Policies and Potentials for Women Empowerment in Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), Jakarta.  Google Scholar
  9. Datta, S./Martin, J./Rawlings, L./Vermehren, A. (2024): Do Behavioral Interventions Enhance the Effects of Cash on Early Childhood Development and Its Determinants? Evidence from a Cluster-Randomized Trial in Madagascar, The European Journal of Development Research 36(2): S. 327–354, DOI 10.1057/s41287-023-00603-y.  Google Scholar
  10. Destatis (2023): Elterngeld 2022: Väteranteil steigt weiter auf 26,1%. Pressemitteilung Nr. 123, https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2023/03/PD23_123_22922.html [29.2.2024].  Google Scholar
  11. Fisseha, S./Sen, G./Ghebreyesus, T. A. et al. (2021): COVID-19: the turning point for gender equality, in: Lancet 398: p. 471.  Google Scholar
  12. Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (2023): Package of resources on gender-responsive social protection, London.  Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, B. et al. (2019): LGBTIQ+ Homelessness: A Review of the Literature, International journal of environmental research and public health, vol. 16: p. 2677, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16152677.  Google Scholar
  14. Gavrilovic, M./Rubio, M./Bastagli, F./Hinton, R./Staab, S./Graham, R./Bilo, C./Khan, R./Peterman, A./Diallo, B./Alfers, L./Santiago, A./Rizvi, Z./Holmes, R./Gonzalo, J./Tabbush, C. (2022): Gender Responsive Social Protection Post Covid-19, Science 375 (6585), DOI: 10.1126/science.abm5922.  Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, R. (2023): Integrating gender equality and inclusion into social protection systems’, Social Protection Technical Assistance, Advice and Resources (STAAR) Facility, DAI Global UK Ltd, United Kingdom.  Google Scholar
  16. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2024): World Social Protection Report 2024–2026, Geneva.  Google Scholar
  17. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2022a): Closing gender gaps in social protection: What workers’ organizations need to know, ILO brief, Geneva.  Google Scholar
  18. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2022b): Engendering informality statistics: gaps and opportunities, ILO Working Paper 84, Geneva.  Google Scholar
  19. International Labour Organization (ILO) (2023): New data shine light on gender gaps in the labour market, Spotlight on Work Statistics, No. 12, March 2023, Geneva.  Google Scholar
  20. Janosch, E. (2023): Gender Food Gap, CARE.  Google Scholar
  21. Jones, N./Holmes, R. (2011): Why is Social Protection Gender-blind? The Politics of Gender and Social Protection.  Google Scholar
  22. Molyneux, M. (2006): Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme, Social Policy & Administration 40 (4): p. 425–449.  Google Scholar
  23. OECD (2021): Towards improved retirement savings outcomes for women, Paris.  Google Scholar
  24. Perera, C./Bakrania, S./Ipince, A./Nisbitt-Ahmed, Z./Obasola, O./Richardson, D./Van de Scheur, J./Yu, R. (2022): Impact of social protection on gender equality in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review of reviews, Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1240, DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1240 [27.2.2024].  Google Scholar
  25. Peterman, A./Roy, S. (2021): Cash transfers and intimate partner violence (IPV) in low- and middle-income settings: A joint research agenda to inform policy and practice, IFPRI.  Google Scholar
  26. Schramkowski, B./Klus, S. (2023): Geschlechtergerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit: Gender Climate Gap und die Notwendigkeit eines sozial-ökologischen Care-Verständnisses, in: Liedholz, Y./Verch, J. (Hrsg.), Nachhaltigkeit und Soziale Arbeit. Grundlagen, Bildungsverständnisse, Praxisfelder, Opladen/Berlin/Toronto.  Google Scholar
  27. Serafini Geoghegan, V. (2020): Tax Justice for the Social Protection of Women, Latin American Network on Debt and Development – Latindadd, Lima.  Google Scholar
  28. Skubsch, S. (2020): Wie geht Sozialstaat feministisch? Zeitschrift Luxemburg. Gesellschaftsanalyse und linke Praxis, August 2020, Corona Dossier (Ausgabe 3/2020).  Google Scholar
  29. UNICEF (2022): Promoting Gender-Transformative Change through Social Protection. An analytic approach, Innocenti Research Report, Florence.  Google Scholar
  30. UNICEF (2022b): Gender-Transformative Programming in UNICEF Selected Case Studies, New York.UNICEF (2021): Social Protection & Gender Equality Outcomes Across the Life-Course, London.  Google Scholar
  31. WHO (2021): Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates, Geneva.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: “Leave No One Behind” – A Feminist Perspective on the Design of Social Protection Systems

The article highlights the added value of a feminist perspective on social protection policy and specifies how this can be taken into account when designing the system. The continuum of the integration of gender justice, which ranges from gender-discriminatory to gender-transformative, serves as an analytical tool. The analysis shows which socio-political impulses can be set to counter discrimination and inequality and to promote transformation. However, it also raises awareness of the fact that social protection is limited in its ability to break down unjust structures. Transformation can only succeed if policy measures are interlinked and power imbalances and injustice are also overcome in other areas.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Esther Schüring / Nicola Wiebe: „Leave no one behind“ – eine feministische Perspektive auf die Ausgestaltung sozialer Sicherungssysteme 809
Zusammenfassung 809
Abstract: “Leave No One Behind” – A Feminist Perspective on the Design of Social Protection Systems 809
Gendergerechte Perspektiven auf die soziale Sicherheit 810
1. Einleitung 810
2. Ausgestaltung einer feministischen sozialen Sicherungspolitik 812
2.1 Gender-diskriminierend 813
2.2 Gender-blind 815
2.3 Gender-sensibel 816
2.4 Gender-responsiv 819
2.5 Gender-transformativ 821
3. Schlussfolgerung 825
Literatur 826