Menu Expand

Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property

  1. Journals
  2. Sociologus
  3. Vol. 73, Issue 1
  4. pp. 51–74

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Preissler, L. Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property. Sociologus, 73(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.2023.1452903
Preissler, Laura "Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property" Sociologus 73.1, 2023, 51-74. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.2023.1452903
Preissler, Laura (2023): Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property, in: Sociologus, vol. 73, iss. 1, 51-74, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.2023.1452903
Format
Download

Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property

Preissler, Laura

Sociologus, Vol. 73 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 51–74

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.2023.1452903
Language
Multiple languages
Pages
24
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 34.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Laura Preissler, Universität Luzern, Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Ethnologisches Seminar, Frohburgstrasse 3, CH 6002 Luzern.

References

  1. Abram, Simone and Marianne Elisabeth Lien. 2023. “Kinning and De-Kinning. Houses, Heirlooms and the Reproduction of Family.” Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale 31(3): 1–17.  Google Scholar
  2. Agllias, Kylie. 2011a. “Every Family: Intergenerational Estrangement between Older Parents and Their Adult-Children.” PhD Dissertation. University of Newcastle.  Google Scholar
  3. Agllias, Kylie. 2011b. “No Longer on Speaking Terms: The Losses Associated with Family Estrangement at the End of Life.” Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services 92: 107–113.  Google Scholar
  4. Agllias, Kylie. 2017. Family Estrangement: A Matter of Perspective. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  5. Amrith, Megha and Cati Coe. 2022. “Disposable Kin: Shifting Registers of Belonging in Global Care Economies.” American Anthropologist 124(2): 307–318.  Google Scholar
  6. Barnwell, Ashley. 2024. “Family Estrangement and the Unseen Work of Not Doing Family.” Sociology 58(6): 1416–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241247252.  Google Scholar
  7. Benda-Beckmann, Franz. 1979. Property in Social Continuity: Continuity and Change in the Maintenance of Property Relationships through Time in Minangkabau, West Sumatra, Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 86. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.  Google Scholar
  8. Bernheim, B. Douglas, Andrei Shleifer and Lawrence H. Summers. 1985. “The Strategic Bequest Motive.” Journal of Political Economy 93(6): 1045–1076.  Google Scholar
  9. Blake, Lucy, Becca Bland and Alison Rouncefield–Swales. 2022. “Estrangement between Siblings in Adulthood: A Qualitative Exploration.” Journal of Family Issues 44(7): 1859–1879.  Google Scholar
  10. Carr, Kristen, Amanda Holman, Jenna Abetz, Elizabeth Vagnoni and Jody Koenig Kellas. 2015. “Giving Voice to the Silence of Family Estrangement: Comparing Reasons of Estranged Parents and Adult Children in a Nonmatched Sample.” Journal of Family Communication 15(2): 130–140.  Google Scholar
  11. Carsten, Janet. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, Joshua, Philip A. Cowan and Carolyn Pape Cowan. 2022. “Attachment Security, Divorce, Parental Estrangement, and Reconciliation.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 39(3): 778–795.  Google Scholar
  13. Cruz, Resto. 2019. “An Inheritance That Cannot Be Stolen: Schooling, Kinship, and Personhood in Post-1945 Central Philippines.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 61(4): 894–924.  Google Scholar
  14. Dinkel, Jürg. 2023. Alles bleibt in der Familie. Erbe und Eigentum in Deutschland, Russland und den USA seit dem 19. Jahrhundert. Wien: Böhlau.  Google Scholar
  15. Egli, Werner. 2000. “Erben, Erbrecht Und Erbschaftssteuern Im Kulturvergleich.” forum historiae iuris. Erste Internet-Zeitschrift für Rechtsgeschichte (30. Juli 2000). https://doi.org/10.26032/fhi–2019–010.  Google Scholar
  16. Finch, Janet and Jennifer Mason. 2000. Passing On. Kinship and Inheritance in England. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  17. Fortes, Meyer. 1969. Kinship and the Social Order. The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. Chicago: Aldine.  Google Scholar
  18. Franklin, Sarah and Susan McKinnon, eds. 2001. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. Durham NC: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Gilligan, M., J. J. Suitor and K. Pillemer. 2015. “Estrangement between Mothers and Adult Children: The Role of Norms and Values.” Journal of Marriage and Family 77: 908–920.  Google Scholar
  20. Goody, Jack. 2008a. “Inheritance, Property and Women: Some Comparative Considerations.” In: Family and Inheritance. Rural Society in Western Europe, 1200–1800, edited by Jack Goody, Joan Thirsk and E. P. Thompson, 10–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Goody, Jack. 2008b. “Introduction.” In: Family and Inheritance: Rural Society in Western Europe, 1200–1800, edited by Jack Goody, Joan Thirsk and E. P. Thompson, 1–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Hofmann, Roland and Michaela Tanner. 2023. Wer (ver)erbt wie? Schweizer Erbschaftsstudie 2023. ZHAW Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, School of Management and Law. https://doi.org/10.21256/zhaw–2528.  Google Scholar
  23. Holmes, Helen. 2019. “Material Affinities: ‘Doing’ Family through the Practices of Passing On.” Sociology 53(1): 174–191.  Google Scholar
  24. Howell, Signe. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. London: Berghahn books.  Google Scholar
  25. Jerrome, Dorothy 1994. “Family Estrangement: Parents and Children Who ‘Lose Touch’.” Journal of Family Therapy 16: 241–258.  Google Scholar
  26. Jones, Christine, Gillian Henderson and Ruth Woods. 2019. “Relative Strangers: Sibling Estrangements Experienced by Children in out-of-Home Care and Moving Towards Permanence.” Children and Youth Services Review 103: 226–235.  Google Scholar
  27. Jurczyk, Karin, Andreas Lange and Barbara Thiessen. 2014. Doing Family – Familienalltag Heute: Warum Familienleben Nicht Mehr Selbstverständlich Ist. Weinheim: Beltz Verlagsgruppe.  Google Scholar
  28. Knight, Daniel. 2018. “The Desire for Disinheritance in Austerity Greece.” Focaal 80: 30–42.  Google Scholar
  29. Langbein, Ulrike. 2002. Geerbte Dinge. Soziale Praxis Und Symbolische Bedeutung Des Erbens. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.  Google Scholar
  30. Leinaweaver, Jessaca. 2007. “On Moving Children: The Social Implications of Andean Child Circulation.” American Ethnologist 34(1): 163–180.  Google Scholar
  31. Levine, Nancy E. 2008. “Alternative Kinship, Marriage and Reproduction.” Annual Review of Anthropology 37: 375–389.  Google Scholar
  32. Luo, Jialing. 2023. “‘De-Kinning’ House, State Discourses and Relatedness in Modern China.” Social Anthropology 31(3): 84–101.  Google Scholar
  33. Lüscher, Kurt. 2005. “Ambivalenz – Eine Annäherung an das Problem der Generationen. Die Aktualität der Generationenfrage.” In: Generationen. Zur Relevanz Eines Wissenschaftlichen Grundbegriffs, edited by Ulrike Jureit and Michael Wildt, 53–78. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.  Google Scholar
  34. Lüscher, Kurt and Karl Pillemer. 1998. “Intergenerational Ambivalence: A New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 60: 413–425.  Google Scholar
  35. Madden, Raymond. 2010. Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London: Sage.  Google Scholar
  36. Magee, Siobhan. 2018. “Inheritance.” In: The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Hilary Callan, 3260–3276. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.  Google Scholar
  37. Marckmann, Bella. 2021. “‘It’s a Balance on a Knife-Edge’: Expectations of Parents and Adult Children.” In: The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe, edited by Anna-Maija Castrén, Vida Česnuitytė, Isabella Crespi, Jacques-Antoine Gauthier, Rita Gouveia, Claude Martin, Almudena Moreno Mínguez and Katarzyna Suwada, 321–341. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.  Google Scholar
  38. Meinert, Lotte and Lone Grøn. 2020. “‘It Runs in the Family’. Exploring Contagious Kinship Connections.” Ethnos 85(4): 581–594.  Google Scholar
  39. Melvin, Karl and John Hickey. 2021. “The Changing Impact and Challenges of Familial Estrangement.” The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families 30(3), 348–356.  Google Scholar
  40. Miller, Daniel. 2007. “What Is a Relationship? Kinship as Negotiated Experience.” Ethnos 72(4): 535–554.  Google Scholar
  41. Mizielinska, Joanna. 2021. “‘Is She Still a Family or Rather Some Stranger?’ – Relative Strangers and Kinship Plasticity in Families of Choice in Poland.” Journal of Homosexuality, 68(11): 1899–1922.  Google Scholar
  42. Morgan, David. 2011. Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  43. Palmberger, Monika. 2019. “Relational Ambivalence: Exploring the Social and Discursive Dimensions of Ambivalence – the Case of Turkish Aging Labor Migrants.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 60(1–2): 74–79.  Google Scholar
  44. Papadaki, Eirini. 2017. “Undoing Kinship: Producing Citizenship in a Public Maternity Hospital in Athens, Greece.” In: Reconnecting State and Kinship, edited by Tatjana Thelen and Erdmute Alber, 178–199. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  Google Scholar
  45. Peisah, Carmelle, Henry Brodaty and Carolyn Quadrio. 2006. “Family Conflict in Dementia: Prodigal Sons and Black Sheep.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21: 485–492.  Google Scholar
  46. Peletz, Michael. 2001. “Ambivalence in Kinship since the 1940s.” In: Relative Values. Reconfiguring Kinship Studies, edited by Sarah Franklin and Susan McKinnon, 413–444. London: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  47. Preissler, Laura. 2024. “Governing Parents: Early Childhood, Intensive Mothering and Disciplinary Power in Switzerland.” University of Lucerne. Lucerne.  Google Scholar
  48. Scharp, K. M. and E. Dorrance Hall. 2017. “Family Marginalization, Alienation and Estrangement: Questioning the Nonvoluntary Status of Family Relationships.” Annals of the International Communication Association 41(1): 28–45.  Google Scholar
  49. Scharp, Kristina M. and Timothy Curran. 2018. “Care-Giving When There Is Family Conflict and Estrangement.” Journal of theAmerican Society on Aging 42(3): 51–56.  Google Scholar
  50. Scharp, Kristina M., Lindsey J. Thomas and Christina G. Paxman. 2015. “‘It Was the Straw That Broke the Camel’s Back’”: Exploring the Distancing Processes Communicatively Constructed in Parent-Child Estrangement Backstories.” Journal of Family Communication 15(4): 330–348.  Google Scholar
  51. Schneider, David. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.  Google Scholar
  52. Selmer, Bodil. 2023. “Concerns, Considerations and Conceptions of Kinship Inheritance in Modern Danish Blended Families.” Social Anthropology 31(3): 18–32.  Google Scholar
  53. Smietana, Marcin. 2017. “Affective De-Commodifying, Economic De-Kinning: Surrogates’ and Gay Fathers’ Narratives in U.S. Surrogacy.” Sociological research online 22(2): 163–175.  Google Scholar
  54. Suerbaum, Magdalena and Sophie Richter-Devroe. 2022. “Migrations through Law, Bureaucracy and Kin: Navigating Citizenship in Relations.” Citizenship Studies 26(6): 727–745.  Google Scholar
  55. Szydlik, Marc. 1999. “Erben in Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Zum Verhältnis Von Familialer Solidarität Und Sozialer Ungleichheit.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 51(1): 80–104.  Google Scholar
  56. Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.  Google Scholar
  57. Young, Michael and Peter Willmott. (1957) 1992. Family and Kinship in East London. Berkley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Drawing on ongoing ethnographic research on rifts between parents and their adult children in Switzerland, this paper examines estrangement processes within the context of intergenerational property transfers. The (prospective) death of a parent, along with related questions surrounding wills, inheritance, and the distribution of heirlooms and mementos, can intensify familial conflicts that have often been simmering for a long time, and may also create new ones.

Recent research on kin relations and inheritance has employed “(de‑)kinning” as an exploratory tool to examine how property transfers “make” and “unmake” kin relations. However, as the case presented in this paper suggests, adult children affected by contested property transfers did not frame such transfers in terms of “(un)doing kinship”, but instead associated them with notions of punishment and unfulfilled expectations. From a broader perspective, the final rift between parents and adult children was seen as the culmination of a parent-child relationship disrupted by unresolved issues from the past. Familial estrangement is a multifaceted process and requires nuanced exploration from a lifespan perspective. Taking a closer look at adult children’s interpretations and contextualization of inheritance disputes within their family histories provides insights into parent-child dynamics marked by ambivalence and the expectations attached to close kin relations.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Laura Preissler: Cutting off by Cutting out? Estrangement Processes in the Context of the Intergenerational Transfer of Property 51
Abstract 51
1. Introduction 51
2. Estrangement as “De-kinning”? 53
3. Kin Relations and Inheritance 54
4. Methods 58
5. Case Study: Ilona 60
5.1 Expectations and Punishment 61
5.2 Sibling Rivalry and Estrangement 63
5.3 Deeply Rooted Tensions in the Family? 64
6. Discussion 65
References 70

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2025 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.