Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Dilger, H. Ethics, Epistemology and Ethnography: The Need for an Anthropological Debate on Ethical Review Processes in Germany. Sociologus, 67(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.67.2.191
Dilger, Hansjörg "Ethics, Epistemology and Ethnography: The Need for an Anthropological Debate on Ethical Review Processes in Germany" Sociologus 67.2, , 191-208. https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.67.2.191
Dilger, Hansjörg: Ethics, Epistemology and Ethnography: The Need for an Anthropological Debate on Ethical Review Processes in Germany, in: Sociologus, vol. 67, iss. 2, 191-208, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/soc.67.2.191

Format

Ethics, Epistemology and Ethnography: The Need for an Anthropological Debate on Ethical Review Processes in Germany

Dilger, Hansjörg

Sociologus, Vol. 67 (2017), Iss. 2 : pp. 191–208

9 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hansjörg Dilger, Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Sozialund Kulturanthropologie, Landoltweg 9-11, 14195 Berlin

Cited By

  1. The ethnographer, the research participants, and the meaningful others: Gray zones of relationality and the ethics of dementia care research

    Pieta, Barbara | Diodati, Francesco

    Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 65 (2023), Iss. P.101141

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101141 [Citations: 3]
  2. Prekäre Freizügigkeiten

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839466001 [Citations: 0]
  3. Plans, Changes, Improvisations

    Faria, Inês

    Anthropology in Action, Vol. 28 (2021), Iss. 2 P.18

    https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2021.280203 [Citations: 1]
  4. Ethical Autoethnography: Is it Possible?

    Edwards, Jane

    International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 20 (2021), Iss. P.160940692199530

    https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921995306 [Citations: 30]
  5. Towards an anthropology of global inequalities and their local manifestations: social anthropology in 2017

    Koch, Insa

    Social Anthropology, Vol. 26 (2018), Iss. 2 P.253

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12520 [Citations: 4]
  6. Navigating ‘ethics in practice’: An ethnographic case study with young women living with HIV in Zambia

    Mackworth-Young, Constance R.S. | Schneiders, Mira L. | Wringe, Alison | Simwinga, Musonda | Bond, Virginia

    Global Public Health, Vol. 14 (2019), Iss. 12 P.1689

    https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2019.1616799 [Citations: 8]
  7. Autoethnography as an ethically contested terrain: some thinking points for consideration

    Sparkes, Andrew C.

    Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 21 (2024), Iss. 1 P.107

    https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2023.2293073 [Citations: 0]
  8. Local Self-Governance and Varieties of Statehood

    Cyrenaica Contemporary: Politics, Identity, and Justice in Times of Transition

    Hüsken, Thomas | Obeidi, Amal S.

    2022

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14996-2_9 [Citations: 1]
  9. Vielschichtige Lebenswelten, komplexe Vulnerabilitäten – zur Lebens- und Arbeitssituation der Frauen am Straßenstrich im Berliner Kurfürstenkiez

    Probst, Ursula

    Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung, Vol. 33 (2020), Iss. 04 P.193

    https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1284-8806 [Citations: 3]

Abstract

Over the last years, debates on research ethics – and the way the ethicality of ethnographic research is assessed by institutional boards and committees – have flourished in national and international anthropology. This article discusses the state of the debate in Germany where ethical review boards have remained so far largely absent in regard to anthropological research and where the commitment to ‘act ethically’ during fieldwork (and beyond) remains largely voluntary. By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork on HIV / AIDS and social relations in Tanzania, I highlight that medical anthropologists may face particular ethical challenges in their work, due to the often close relationship of their research with human suffering. Furthermore, however, I argue that the sub-discipline can raise important questions concerning the potential institutionalization of ethical review processes in anthropology in Germany and the pitfalls that should be avoided with regard to the ‘fetishization’ of certain ethical doctrines (such as the informed consent process) which have proven incommensurable with the core epistemological assumptions of the discipline. This article does not provide an exhaustive overview of the debates on ethics that have been conducted in Germany or internationally over the last decade(s). It is rather meant as a political intervention that seeks to broaden the discussion about the potential formalization of ethical review processes in Germany and how the discipline can shape such a process proactively by foregrounding some of its inherent strengths: reflexivity, creativity and dialogue.