Menu Expand

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style

Weinke, A. (2022). 'Defensive visual justice' In R. Leiserowitz, G. Malinauskaitė, & H. Vitkus (Eds.), Making Justice Visible (1st ed., pp. 175-196)
Weinke, Annette. "Defensive visual justice: Strategies of mediatization in early Nazi trials in East Germany". Making Justice Visible, edited by Ruth Leiserowitz, Gintarė Malinauskaitė and Hektoras Vitkus, fibre Verlag, 2022, pp. 175-196.
Weinke, A. (2022): 'Defensive visual justice', in Leiserowitz, R, Malinauskaitė, G, Vitkus, H (eds.). Making Justice Visible. fibre Verlag, pp. 175-196.

Format

Defensive visual justice

Strategies of mediatization in early Nazi trials in East Germany

Weinke, Annette

In: Making Justice Visible (2022), pp. 175–196

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Pricing

Author Details

Annette Weinke

Weinke, Annette, PhD, is Professor for Modern and Contemporary History at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and co-director of the Jena Center for 20th Century History

References

  1. Beattie, Andrew H.: Allied Internment Camps in Occupied Germany: Extrajudicial Detention in the Name of Denazification, 1945–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).  Google Scholar
  2. Bilsky, Leora: ‘The Eichmann Trial and the Legacy of Jurisdiction’, in Seyla Benhabib, ed., Politics in Dark Times: Encounters with Hannah Arendt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 198–218.  Google Scholar
  3. Böhm, Boris / Scharnetzky, Julius: ‘“Wir fordern schwerste Bestrafung”: Der Dresdner “Euthanasie”-Prozess 1947 und die Öffentlichkeit’, in Osterloh and Vollnhals, Vom Recht, 189–206.  Google Scholar
  4. Cassiday, Julie A.: The Enemy on Trial: Early Soviet Courts on Stage and Screen (De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2000).  Google Scholar
  5. Crowe, David M., ed.: Stalin’s Soviet Justice: ‘Show’ Trials, War Crimes Trials, and Nuremberg (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).  Google Scholar
  6. Delage, Christian / Goodrich, Peter, eds: The Scene of the Mass Crime: History, Film and International Tribunals (London, New York: Routledge, 2013).  Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, Lawrence: The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001).  Google Scholar
  8. Eichmüller, Andreas: Keine Generalamnestie: Die Strafverfolgung von NS-Verbrechen in der frühen Bundesrepublik (München: Oldenbourg, 2012).  Google Scholar
  9. Eschebach, Insa: ‘“Negative Elemente”: Ermittlungsberichte des MfS über ehemalige SS-Aufseherinnen’, in Annette Leo and Peter Reif-Spirek, eds, Helden, Täter und Verräter: Studien zum DDR-Antifaschismus (Berlin: Metropol, 1999), 197–210.  Google Scholar
  10. Finder, Gabriel N. / Prusin, Alexander V.: Justice behind the Iron Curtain: Nazis on Trial in Communist Poland (Toronto et al.: University of Toronto Press, 2018).  Google Scholar
  11. Fulbrook, Mary: Reckonings: Legacies of Nazi Persecution and the Quest for Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).  Google Scholar
  12. Fulbrook, Mary: ‘Approaches to German Contemporary History since 1945: Politics and Paradigms’, Zeithistorische Forschungen / Studies in Contemporary History 1, 1 (2004), 31–50.  Google Scholar
  13. Gieseke, Jens: ‘Antifaschistischer Staat und postfaschistische Gesellschaft: Die DDR, das MfS und die NS-Täter’, Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 35, 3 (2010), 79–94.  Google Scholar
  14. Goldenbogen, Nora: ‘Sachsen’, in Stefanie Endlich et al., eds, Gedenkstätten für die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus (Berlin: Kulturstiftung der Länder, 1999), 250–260.  Google Scholar
  15. Goltermann, Svenja: Opfer: Die Wahrnehmung von Krieg und Gewalt in der Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer, 2017).  Google Scholar
  16. Greve, Michael: Der justitielle und rechtspolitische Umgang mit den NS-Gewaltverbrechen in den sechziger Jahren (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001).  Google Scholar
  17. Hensel, Rolf: Stufen der Gerechtigkeit: NS-Täter vor Gericht in der SBZ/DDR (Berlin: Metropol, 2004).  Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmann, David L.: Stalinist Values: The Cultural Norms of Soviet Modernity, 1917–1941 (Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 2003).  Google Scholar
  19. Joyce, Daniel: ‘Human Rights and the Mediatization of International Law’, Leiden Journal of International Law 23 (2010), 507–527.  Google Scholar
  20. Judt, Tony: Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (London: Vintage, 2010).  Google Scholar
  21. Kirchheimer, Otto: Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).  Google Scholar
  22. Meyer Seitz, Christian: Die Verfolgung von NS-Straftaten in der sowjetischen Besatzungszone (Berlin: Arno Spitz, 1998).  Google Scholar
  23. Nollau, Günter: Das Amt: 50 Jahre Zeuge der Geschichte (München: C. Bertelsmann Verlag, 1978).  Google Scholar
  24. Raim, Edith: Justiz zwischen Diktatur und Demokratie: Wiederaufbau und Ahndung von NS-Verbrechen in Westdeutschland 1945–1949 (München: Oldenbourg, 2013).  Google Scholar
  25. Richardson-Little, Ned: The Human Rights Dictatorship: Socialism, Global Solidarity and Revolution in East Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).  Google Scholar
  26. Rüter, Christiaan F. et al., eds: DDR-Justiz und NS-Verbrechen: Sammlung ostdeutscher Strafurteile wegen nationalsozialistischer Tötungsverbrechen, vol. 9 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007).  Google Scholar
  27. Sand, Philippe: East-West Street: On the Origins of ‘Genocide’ and ‘Crimes against Humanity’ (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2016).  Google Scholar
  28. Seidel, Niels: Die KZ-Außenlager Görlitz und Rennersdorf: Ein Beitrag zur Aufarbeitung der Geschehnisse im KZ Groß Rosen (Dresden: Neisse Verlag, 2008).  Google Scholar
  29. Siton, Jerzy S.: ‘Adolf Eichmann ludobójca pogrąża się w sobie’, Polityka, 29 July 1961, 12.  Google Scholar
  30. Steinitz, Maya: ‘The Milošević Trial – Live! An Iconical Analysis of International Law’s Claim of Legitimate Authority’, Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, 1 (2005), 103–123.  Google Scholar
  31. Vormbaum, Moritz: ‘An “Indispensable Component in the Elimination of Fascism”: War Crimes Trials and International Criminal Law in the German Democratic Republic’, in Morten Bergsmo et al., eds, Historical Origins of International Criminal Law, vol. 2 (Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2014).  Google Scholar
  32. Weckel, Ulrike: Beschämende Bilder: Deutsche Reaktionen auf alliierte Dokumentarfilme über befreite Konzentrationslager (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2011).  Google Scholar
  33. Wecke, Ulrike: ‘Watching the accused watch the Nazi crimes: Observers’ reports on the atrocity film screenings in the Belsen, Nuremberg and Eichmann trials’, London Review of International Law 6, 1 (2018), 45–73.  Google Scholar
  34. Weinke, Annette: ‘Judging Medical Crimes in Divided Germany’, in Volker Roelcke et al., eds, Silence, Scapegoats, Self-Reflection: The Shadow of Nazi Medical Crimes on Medicine and Bioethics (Göttingen: V&R unipress, 2015), 97–99.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Annette Weinke: Defensive visual justice. Strategies of mediatization in early Nazi trials in East Germany 175
A permanent ‘problem child’? Historicizing East German investigations against war criminals 178
Idiosyncrasies of Nazi investigations in postwar East Germany 184
The Dresden doctors’ trial of 1947 186
The Görlitz show trial of 1948 188
1) Court design and the role of the judiciary 192
2) Visualization of guilt 193
3) The ambiguities of atrocity forensics 194
Conclusion 196