Menu Expand
  1. Subjects (Books)
  2. Law
  3. Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law
  4. Environment, transport & planning law: general
  5. Handlungsformen des Umweltrechts der Europäischen Union
  6. pp. 81–98

BOOK CHAPTER

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style
Hurka, S. (2025). 'Die Komplexität von Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Union' In J. Saurer, (Ed.), Handlungsformen des Umweltrechts der Europäischen Union (1st ed., pp. 81-98)
Hurka, Steffen. "Die Komplexität von Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Union: Empirische Trends und Konsequenzen für die Implementation". Handlungsformen des Umweltrechts der Europäischen Union, edited by Johannes Saurer, Duncker & Humblot, 2025, pp. 81-98.
Hurka, S. (2025): 'Die Komplexität von Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Union', in Saurer, J (ed.). Handlungsformen des Umweltrechts der Europäischen Union. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 81-98.
Format
Download

Die Komplexität von Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Union

Empirische Trends und Konsequenzen für die Implementation

Hurka, Steffen

In: Handlungsformen des Umweltrechts der Europäischen Union (2025), pp. 81–98

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-59563-1.2025.412724
Language
German
Pages
18

Pricing

Individual
€ 28.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Steffen Hurka

Prof. Dr. Steffen Hurka, Zeppelin Universität Friedrichshafen, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland

References

  1. Adam, Christian / Hurka, Steffen / Knill, Christoph / Steinebach, Yves: Policy accumulation and the democratic responsiveness trap, Cambridge University Press 2019.  Google Scholar
  2. Adam, Christian / Steinebach, Yves / Knill, Christoph: Neglected challenges to evidence-based policy-making: the problem of policy accumulation, Policy Sciences 51 (2018), 269ff.  Google Scholar
  3. Baratta, Roberto: Complexity of EU law in the domestic implementing process, The Theory and Practice of Legislation 2 (2014), 293ff.  Google Scholar
  4. Björnsson, Sigurd: Läsbarhet, 1968.  Google Scholar
  5. Brandsma, Gijs Jan / Pollex, Johannes / Tobin, Liam: Overlooked yet ongoing: policy termination in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies 61 (2023), 1360ff.  Google Scholar
  6. Daniel, William T. / Hurka, Steffen: Unpacking the European Commission: Cabinet Composition and EU Policymaking, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13678.  Google Scholar
  7. Den Heijer, Maarten / Abeelen, Jurriaan / Maslyka, Oksana: On the Use and Misuse of Recitals in European Union Law, 2019, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3445372.  Google Scholar
  8. Europäische Kommission, Juristischer Dienst: Gemeinsamer Leitfaden des Europäischen Parlaments, des Rates und der Kommission für Personen, die an der Abfassung von Rechtstexten der Europäischen Union mitwirken, 2015, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2880/836230.  Google Scholar
  9. Golub, Jonathan: EUPROPS: A new dataset on policymaking in the European Union from 1958 to 2021, European Union Politics 25 (2024), 197ff.  Google Scholar
  10. Haag, Moritz / Hurka, Steffen / Kaplaner, Christoph: Policy complexity and implementation performance in the European Union, Regulation & Governance 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12580.  Google Scholar
  11. Haag, Moritz / Hurka, Steffen: Policy complexity and legislative duration in the European Union, European Union Politics 21 (2020), 87ff.  Google Scholar
  12. Hurka, Steffen / Haag, Moritz / Kaplaner, Christoph: Proposal complexity and report allocation in the European Parliament, European Union Politics 24 (2023), 307ff.  Google Scholar
  13. Hurka, Steffen / Haag, Moritz / Kaplaner, Christoph: Policy complexity in the European Union, 1993–today: introducing the EUPLEX dataset, JEPP 2022, 1512ff.  Google Scholar
  14. Hurka, Steffen / Steinebach, Yves: Legal Instrument Choice in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (2021), 278ff.  Google Scholar
  15. Hurka, Steffen: The Institutional and Political Roots of Complex Policies – Evidence from the European Union, European Journal of Political Research 62 (2023), 1168ff.  Google Scholar
  16. Hurka, Steffen: Treated by the Treaty? How the expansion of co-decision affected the volume and complexity of EU legislation, JEPP 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2025.2519563.  Google Scholar
  17. Katz, Daniel Martin / Bommarito II, Michael J.: Measuring the complexity of the law: the United States Code, Artificial Intelligence and Law 22 (2014), 337ff.  Google Scholar
  18. Kniaris, Vasilis / Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis / Vassiliou, Yannis: Network analysis in the legal domain: a complex model for European Union legal sources, Journal of Complex Networks 6 (2018), 243ff.  Google Scholar
  19. Knill, Christoph / Steinebach, Yves / Zink, Roland: How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload and policy triage, JEPP 2024, 324ff.  Google Scholar
  20. Lehmann, Pola / Franzmann, Simon / Burst, Christian / Regel, Sandra / Riethmüller, Tom / Volkens, Andrea / Weßels, Bernhard / Zehnter, Lea: The manifesto data collection, Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Version 2023a, Berlin 2023, WZB/IfDem, https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2023a.  Google Scholar
  21. Limberg, Daniel / Steinebach, Yves / Bayerlein, Leopold / Knill, Christoph: The more the better? Rule growth and policy impact from a macro perspective, European Journal of Political Research 60 (2021), 438ff.  Google Scholar
  22. Senninger, Roman: What makes policy complex?, Political Science Research and Methods 11 (2023), 913ff.  Google Scholar
  23. Shannon, Claude E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948), 379ff.  Google Scholar
  24. Timmermans, Frans: Refit measures will make sure EU rules bring concrete benefits, 2015, https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/feature/refit-measures-will-make-sure-eu-rules-bring-concrete-benefits.  Google Scholar
  25. Tolochko, Pavel / Song, Hye Min / Boomgaarden, Hajo G.: „That Looks Hard!“: Effects of Objective and Perceived Textual Complexity on Factual and Structural Political Knowledge, Political Communication 36 (2019), 609ff.  Google Scholar
  26. Toshkov, Dimiter: Enhancing Access to EU Law: Why Bother?, in: ESCB Legal Conference 2020, European Central Bank 2021, S. 47–59, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.escblegalconferenceproceedings2020~4c11842967.en.pdf.  Google Scholar
  27. Treib, Oliver: Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs, Living Reviews in European Governance 2014, https://doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2014-1.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Steffen Hurka: Die Komplexität von Richtlinien und Verordnungen der Europäischen Union. Empirische Trends und Konsequenzen für die Implementation 81
I. Einleitung 81
II. Das EUPLEX-Projekt 82
III. Wie lässt sich die Komplexität von EU-Gesetzen messen? 83
1. Struktur 84
2. Sprache 85
3. Interdependenz 86
4. Der Komplexitätsscore 87
IV. Empirische Trends 87
1. Vergleich über Zeit und Politikbereiche 87
2. Erklärungsansätze für die beobachtete Varianz 89
3. Vergleich über Handlungsformen 91
V. Umsetzungsdefizite bei komplexen Richtlinien: Die Verordnung als Ausweg? 93
VI. Fazit 96

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2025 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Publishing Platform by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.