Menu Expand
  1. Subjects (Books)
  2. Law
  3. Jurisprudence & general issues
  4. Methods, theory & philosophy of law
  5. Law in Times of Crisis
  6. pp. 207–230

BOOK CHAPTER

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style
Beck, S. (2024). 'Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue' In E. Hilgendorf, (Ed.), Law in Times of Crisis (1st ed., pp. 207-230)
Beck, Susanne. "Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue: On the Method of Culture-Based Comparative Criminal Law". Law in Times of Crisis, edited by Eric Hilgendorf, Duncker & Humblot, 2024, pp. 207-230.
Beck, S. (2024): 'Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue', in Hilgendorf, E (ed.). Law in Times of Crisis. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 207-230.
Format
Download

Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue

On the Method of Culture-Based Comparative Criminal Law

Beck, Susanne

In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 207–230

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-58941-8.2023.207
Language
English
Pages
24

Pricing

Individual
€ 28.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Susanne Beck

Beck, Susanne, Prof. Dr., Faculty of Law, Leibniz-University of Hanover, Germany

References

  1. Albert, Michel: Capitalism against Capitalism, London 1993.  Google Scholar
  2. Ambos, Kai: Internationales Strafrecht: Strafanwendungsrecht, Völkerstrafrecht, Europäisches Strafrecht, 2nd edition, München 2008.  Google Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, Bill/Griffiths, Gareth/Tiffin, Helen: Post-Colonial Studies, 2nd edition, London 2008.  Google Scholar
  4. Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich: Entwicklung, Aufgaben und Methoden der Strafrechtsvergleichung, Tübingen 1955.  Google Scholar
  5. Jung, Heike: Grundfragen der Strafrechtsvergleichung, JuS 1998, pp. 1–7.  Google Scholar
  6. Jung, Heike: Recht und kulturelle Identität – Anmerkungen zur Rezeption, Transplantation und Diffusion von Recht, ZStW Vol. 121, 2009, pp. 467–500.  Google Scholar
  7. Kahn, Paul: The Cultural Study of Law, Chicago 1999.  Google Scholar
  8. Koch, Hans-Georg: Fortpflanzungsmedizin im europäischen Rechtsvergleich, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 27/2001, pp. 44–52.  Google Scholar
  9. Kögler, Hans-Herbert: Die Macht des Dialogs. Kritische Hermeneutik nach Gadamer, Foucault und Rorty, Stuttgart 1992.  Google Scholar
  10. Krygier, Martin: Law as Tradition, Law and Philosophy Vol. 5, 1986, pp. 237–262.  Google Scholar
  11. Legrand, Pierre: European Legal Systems are not Converging, International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 45, 1996, pp. 52–81.  Google Scholar
  12. Legrand, Pierre: How to Compare now?, Legal Studies Vol. 16, 1996, pp. 232–242.  Google Scholar
  13. Leiter, Brian: American Legal Realism, in: Edmundson, William A./Golding, Martin P. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Oxford 2004, pp. 50–66.  Google Scholar
  14. LordGoff of Chieveley, Robert: The Wilberforce Lecture 1997: The Future of the Common Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 46, 1997, pp. 745–760.  Google Scholar
  15. Losch, Bernhard: Kulturfaktor Recht, Cologne 2006.  Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, Jean Francois: Das postmoderne Wissen, Vienna 1999.  Google Scholar
  17. Marcic, René: Rechtsphilosophie, Freiburg 1969.  Google Scholar
  18. Markesinis, Basil: Comparative Law in the Courtroom and Classroom, Oxford/Portland 2003.  Google Scholar
  19. Mattei, Ugo: Comparative Law and Critical Legal Studies, in: Reimann, Mathias/Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2006, pp. 815–836.  Google Scholar
  20. Michaels, Ralf: The Functional Method of Comparative Law, in: Reimann, Mathias/Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2006, pp. 339–382.  Google Scholar
  21. Midgley, Juliet: The Role of Legal History, British Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2, 1975, pp. 153–165.  Google Scholar
  22. Müller-Funk, Wolfgang: Kulturtheorie, Tübingen/Basel 2006.  Google Scholar
  23. Nelken, David: Comparing Legal Cultures, in: Sarat, Austin (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, Malden/Oxford/Carlton 2004, pp. 113–127.  Google Scholar
  24. Nelken, David (ed.): Comparing Legal Cultures, Aldershot 1997.  Google Scholar
  25. Nietzsche, Friedrich: Basic Writings of Nietzsche, New York 2009.  Google Scholar
  26. Nietzsche, Friedrich: Zur Genealogie der Moral, III 12, in: Colli, Giorgio (ed.), Sämtliche Werke, Bd. 5, 2nd edition, Munich 1988.  Google Scholar
  27. Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud: Moralischer Universalismus – kultureller Relativismus. Zum Problem der Menschenrechte, in: Hoffmann, J. (ed.), Universale Menschenrechte im Widerspruch der Kulturen, Frankfurt a.M. 1994, pp. 79–103.  Google Scholar
  28. Paul, Gregor/Robertson-Wensauer, Caroline Y. (eds.): Traditionelle chinesische Kultur und Menschenrechtsfrage, 2nd edition, Baden-Baden 1998.  Google Scholar
  29. Perron, Walter: Sind die nationalen Grenzen des Strafrechts überwindbar? Überlegungen zu den strukturellen Voraussetzungen der Angleichung und Vereinheitlichung unterschiedlicher Strafrechtssysteme, ZStW Vol. 109, 1997, pp. 281–301.  Google Scholar
  30. Peters, Anne/Schwenke, Heiner: Comparative Law beyond Post-Modernism, International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 49, 2000, pp. 800–834.  Google Scholar
  31. Qian, Xu/Tang, Shenglan/Garner, Paul: Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion among unmarried women in China: a systematic review, BMC Health Services Research 2004.  Google Scholar
  32. Radbruch, Gustav: Rechtsphilosophie, 3rd edition 1932, in: Kaufmann, Arthur (ed.), Gesamtausgabe: Rechtsphilosophie II, Munich 1993.  Google Scholar
  33. Reimann, Mathias/Zimmermann, Reinhard (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford 2008.  Google Scholar
  34. Richers, Dominik: Postmoderne Theorien in der Rechtsvergleichung, ZaöRV Vol. 67, 2007, pp. 509–540.  Google Scholar
  35. Roxin, Claus: Strafrecht AT, 4th edition, Munich 2006.  Google Scholar
  36. Sarat, Austin/Kearns, Thomas R. (eds.): Law in the Domains of Culture, 5th edition, Michigan 2003.  Google Scholar
  37. Satzger, Helmut: Internationales und Europäisches Strafrecht, 3rd edition, Baden-Baden 2009.  Google Scholar
  38. Sieber, Ulrich: Strafrechtsvergleichung im Wandel, in: Sieber, Ulrich/Albrecht, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Strafrecht und Kriminologie unter einem Dach, Berlin 2006, pp. 78–130.  Google Scholar
  39. Stessens, Guy: Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective, International and Comparative Law Quarterly Vol. 43, 1994, pp. 493–520.  Google Scholar
  40. Sukopp, Thomas: Wider den radikalen Kulturrelativismus, Aufklärung und Kritik 2005, pp. 136–154.  Google Scholar
  41. Tai, Michael Cheng-tek/Tsai, Tsungo-po: Who Makes the Decision? Patient’s Autonomy vs Paternalism in a Confucian Society, Croatian Medical Journal Vol. 44, 2003, pp. 558–561.  Google Scholar
  42. Tiedemann, Klaus: Wirtschaftsstrafrecht AT, 2nd edition, Cologne/Munich 2007.  Google Scholar
  43. Triandis, Harry C.: The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts, Psychological Review Vol. 96, 1989, pp. 506–520.  Google Scholar
  44. Triandis, Harry C./Suh, Eunkook M.: Cultural Influences on Personality, Annual Review of Psychology Vol. 53, 2002, pp. 133–160.  Google Scholar
  45. Vasilache, Andreas: Interkulturelles Verstehen nach Gadamer und Foucault, Frankfurt a.M. 2003.  Google Scholar
  46. Waldenfels, Bernhard: Grundmotive einer Phänomenologie des Fremden, Frankfurt a.M. 2006.  Google Scholar
  47. Winckler, Edwin A.: Chinese Reproductive Policy at the Turn of the Millennium: Dynamic Stability, Population and Development Review Vol. 28, 2002, pp. 379–418.  Google Scholar
  48. Wittgenstein, Ludwig: Philosophische Untersuchungen, Werkausgabe Bd. 1, Frankfurt a.M. 1995.  Google Scholar
  49. Zumbansen, Peer: Comparative Law’s Coming of Age?, German Law Journal Vol. 6, 2005, pp. 1073–1084.  Google Scholar
  50. Zweigert, Konrad/Kötz, Hein: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts, 3rd edition, Tübingen 1996.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Susanne Beck: Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue 207
I. Introduction 207
II. Goals of Culturally Comparative Criminal Law 209
1. In Search of Knowledge 209
2. Supplementing Functionalism in Practice-Based Comparative Law 210
III. Theoretical Background of Culture-Based Comparisons in Criminal Law 213
1. Culture – An Attempt at a Definition 213
2. Culture-Relatedness as a Product of Postmodernism 214
3. The Relativization of Supposed Objectivity and Neutrality 216
IV. Implementing Culture-Based Comparative Law 218
1. Reflections on Goals 218
2. The Legal Understanding of Culture-Related Considerations 219
3. Interdisciplinarity of Comparative Criminal Law 220
4. Acceptance of Ambiguity 221
5. Emphasis on Differences 221
6. Particularities of Criminal Law 222
7. Evaluation: Universalism or Relativism? 224
V. Conclusions 225
Bibliography 225

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.