Law in Times of Crisis
BOOK
Cite BOOK
Style
Format
Law in Times of Crisis
Festschrift for Yoram Danziger
Editors: Hilgendorf, Eric
Schriften zum Strafrechtsvergleich, Vol. 20
(2024)
Additional Information
Book Details
Pricing
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Message from the Dean | 5 | ||
Foreword | 7 | ||
Brigitte Zypries: Jewish Lawyers in Germany – an Asset for the Liberal Constitutional State | 9 | ||
Inhaltsverzeichnis | 15 | ||
I. Constitutional Law and Legal Theory | 19 | ||
Daphne Barak-Erez: Reparations for Holocaust Survivors – Searching for Justice in Israel and Germany | 21 | ||
I. Introduction | 21 | ||
1. The Reparations Agreement and Israeli Legislation | 23 | ||
2. The Moral and Political Controversy over the Reparations Agreement | 25 | ||
3. The Legal Questions: Recognized and Unrecognized History for the Purposes of the Law | 27 | ||
4. Additional Reparations to Holocaust Survivors and Other Victims of Nazi Germany | 31 | ||
II. Reparations from Germany and Social Justice in Israel | 33 | ||
III. The Legal Challenge and the Shortcomings of Law | 34 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 37 | ||
Bibliography | 37 | ||
Leandro Dias and Ezequiel Heffes: New Typologies of Non-International Armed Conflict? | 41 | ||
I. Introduction | 41 | ||
II. Categories of Non-International Armed Conflict under Article 8(2)(f) of the Rome Statute | 43 | ||
1. The Single Category Perspective | 44 | ||
2. The New Typology Hypothesis | 46 | ||
III. What Does the Case Law Say? | 48 | ||
IV. Defending the New Typology: Interpretation of Article 8(2)(f) through the Lens of the Nullum Crimen Principle (Article 22) | 51 | ||
1. The Nullum Crimen Principle and the Lex Stricta Requirement in the Rome Statute | 51 | ||
2. The New Typology as a Restrictive Interpretation of Ambiguous Provisions | 54 | ||
3. The Reasonableness of the New Typology | 58 | ||
V. Concluding Remarks | 62 | ||
Bibliography | 63 | ||
Avigdor Klagsbald: Justice Danziger's Judgment on the Boycott Law | 67 | ||
I. Introduction | 67 | ||
II. The Constitutional Structure of the State of Israel | 67 | ||
III. The Status of the Basic Laws | 70 | ||
IV. The Constitutional Status of Freedom of Expression | 71 | ||
V. The Conditions of the Limitation Clause | 72 | ||
VI. The Boycott Law | 73 | ||
VII. The Minority Opinion of Justice Yoram Danziger | 74 | ||
VIII. A Few Comments of my Own: Severance, Reading Down and the Outcome of the Judgment | 78 | ||
Bibliography | 81 | ||
Karl Kreuzer: Is Islamic Shariah Law Applicable under German Constitutional Law? | 83 | ||
I. Introduction | 83 | ||
II. What is Sharia? | 83 | ||
1. Sharia in the Traditional Sense | 83 | ||
2. State Reception of Sharia Law: Referral and/or Codification | 84 | ||
3. Sharia Law as Foreign Law Incompatible with the Basic Law | 85 | ||
III. Does Sharia Law Apply under German Constitutional Law? | 86 | ||
1. What Does “Applicability” Mean under the Basic Law? | 86 | ||
2. Criminal Law and Other Public Law | 87 | ||
3. Family Law and Law of Inheritance | 87 | ||
a) Applicability of German Substantive Law by Virtue of a General Connection to the German Place of Habitual Residence: Lex Domicilii | 87 | ||
b) Applicability of (Foreign) Sharia Law by Virtue of Linkage to Foreign Nationality: Lex Patriae | 88 | ||
4. Exceptions to the Applicability of the Lex Patriae | 88 | ||
a) Exclusive Applicability of German Substantive Law by Virtue of Unilateral Conflict-of-Law Rules: Lex Fori | 88 | ||
b) Inapplicability of (Foreign) Sharia Law by Virtue of Reservation Clause (Public Policy: Art. 6 IACC) | 90 | ||
5. Special Conflict Rules for Refugees | 91 | ||
a) Convention Refugees and Persons Entitled to Asylum | 91 | ||
b) There Exist no Special Rules for Persons Entitled to Subsidiary Protection | 92 | ||
c) Inadequacy of the Inconsistent Determination of Personal Status Provisions for Refugees in German Conflict of Laws | 92 | ||
IV. Ways towards a Uniform Personal Status for Refugees | 94 | ||
1. International Law | 94 | ||
2. National Law of EU-Member States | 95 | ||
3. EU Law | 97 | ||
a) Lex lata: Equality of all Refugees under Substantive Law and Integration Law | 97 | ||
b) Lex ferenda: Uniform Personal Status Provisions for all Refugees | 98 | ||
V. Summary | 100 | ||
Bibliography | 101 | ||
Clemens Lückemann: Large-Scale Disasters in Germany and Israel | 103 | ||
I. Introduction | 103 | ||
II. Final Report of the Commission on Ways to Improve the Investigation of Complex Casualty Incidents | 104 | ||
1. The Investigation Should Transcend the Confines of the Criminal Law | 104 | ||
2. Victim Concerns Could Be Identified (Even) Better | 105 | ||
3. An Ongoing Main Judicial Hearing Must Not Be Under the Sword of Damocles of Time Barring | 106 | ||
III. Conclusion | 107 | ||
IV. Annex: A 20-Point Proposal on Ways to Improve the Investigation of Complex Casualty Incidents | 108 | ||
1. The Comprehensive Investigation of Casualty Incidents Extending Beyond Criminal Proceedings | 108 | ||
2. Time Barring | 108 | ||
3. Victim Prosecutors | 108 | ||
4. Dealing with Injured Parties/Survivors During Criminal Investigation Proceedings | 109 | ||
5. Monetary Compensation – Adhesion Proceedings | 109 | ||
6. Understanding of Causation, an Investigative Perspective | 109 | ||
7. Database of Experts | 110 | ||
8. Instructing, Directing and Examining Expert Witnesses | 110 | ||
9. Professionalized Staff Support for Affected Prosecutors' Offices | 110 | ||
10. Legally Qualified Assistants for Courts and Prosecutors' Offices | 111 | ||
11. Court Managers, On-Site Business Managers | 111 | ||
12. IT; Digitization; Electronic File (Scanning Standards); Data Exchange | 112 | ||
13. Physical Facilities: Suitable Court Rooms with Adjoining Rooms | 112 | ||
14. Guidelines, Contingency Plans | 113 | ||
15. Review of Completed Large-Scale Trial Proceedings – Criticism of Operations | 113 | ||
16. Exchange of Best Practice Guidelines | 113 | ||
17. Coaching and Supervision | 113 | ||
18. Media Work | 114 | ||
19. More Flexible Cost Regulation in Cases of Discontinuation of Proceedings Under § 153a StPO | 114 | ||
20. Postponement of the Retirement of Judges for the Duration of the Main Hearing and Reduction of Sentences | 114 | ||
Bibliography | 114 | ||
Yoram Rabin and Alon Rodas: The Role of the State Comptroller of Israel in Combating Government Corruption and Promoting Moral Integrity | 115 | ||
I. Introduction | 115 | ||
1. Supreme Audit Institutions: General Review and Main Functions | 115 | ||
2. Supreme Audit Institutions: Role of Curbing Corruption | 117 | ||
3. The Israeli SAI | 119 | ||
II. Moral Integrity Audit | 120 | ||
III. Real-Time Auditing | 123 | ||
IV. Uncovering Suspected Criminal Acts | 124 | ||
V. The Authority to Issue Orders to Protect Whistleblowers | 125 | ||
VI. Audits of Political Parties and Candidate Financing | 127 | ||
VII. Prevention of Conflicts of Interest: Ministers and Deputy Ministers | 128 | ||
VIII. The State Comptroller of Israel: A Pillar of Good Governance and Moral Integrity | 128 | ||
Bibliography | 129 | ||
Stefanie Schmahl: Erosion of the Rule of Law: Curtailing the Powers of Constitutional Courts | 133 | ||
I. Restrictions on the Powers of the Supreme Court in Israel by the Knesset's February 2023 Draft Law | 133 | ||
II. Legal Considerations on a Comparable Situation in the Federal Republic of Germany | 135 | ||
1. Admissibility of Changing the Binding Effect of the Federal Constitutional Court's Decisions? | 137 | ||
2. Admissibility of Changing the Modalities for Electing Judges of the Federal Constitutional Court? | 138 | ||
3. Result | 141 | ||
III. Conclusion | 142 | ||
Bibliography | 143 | ||
Kyrill-A. Schwarz: How the Law Deals with Troublemakers | 145 | ||
I. Introduction | 145 | ||
II. Troublemakers | 147 | ||
III. The Guarantee of Legal Redress and its Realisation in Ordinary Law | 148 | ||
1. Article 19 (4) GG as a General Principle of the Rule of Law | 148 | ||
2. Limitations on Legal Redress by Means of Ordinary Law – the Example of the Right of Access to Information | 149 | ||
IV. Legitimate Response Options of the Constitutional State | 153 | ||
1. Historical Models | 153 | ||
2. The Instruments of the Democratic Constitutional State | 154 | ||
a) Deprivation of the Capacity to Institute Proceedings | 154 | ||
b) Set Aside and Do Not Process | 155 | ||
c) Negation of the Need for Legal Protection | 156 | ||
d) Fines for Abuse and Maliciousness | 157 | ||
V. Summary and Outlook | 159 | ||
Bibliography | 159 | ||
Alex Stein: Probabilism in Legal Interpretation | 163 | ||
I. Theories of Interpretation | 163 | ||
II. Introducing Probabilism | 167 | ||
1. Standard of Proof | 169 | ||
2. Tie-Breakers | 172 | ||
3. Language, “Family Resemblances” and Other Evidence | 174 | ||
III. Probabilism and Bostock | 177 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 182 | ||
Bibliography | 183 | ||
Christoph Weber and Caroline S. Rapatz: Restoring Stolen Dignity | 187 | ||
I. Depromotions as an Instrument of the Nazi Regime | 187 | ||
II. The Würzburg Reappraisal Project | 188 | ||
1. The Genesis and Course of the Project | 188 | ||
2. Methodology | 190 | ||
III. Depromotion Practices under the Nazi Regime | 191 | ||
1. The (Administrative) Law Foundations for the Deprivation of Doctoral Degrees | 191 | ||
2. Conduct of the Depromotion Proceedings | 195 | ||
IV. Würzburg Depromotions 1933–1945 | 196 | ||
V. Rehabilitation Resolution | 200 | ||
Bibliography | 202 | ||
II. Criminal Law and Criminal Justice | 205 | ||
Susanne Beck: Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue | 207 | ||
I. Introduction | 207 | ||
II. Goals of Culturally Comparative Criminal Law | 209 | ||
1. In Search of Knowledge | 209 | ||
2. Supplementing Functionalism in Practice-Based Comparative Law | 210 | ||
III. Theoretical Background of Culture-Based Comparisons in Criminal Law | 213 | ||
1. Culture – An Attempt at a Definition | 213 | ||
2. Culture-Relatedness as a Product of Postmodernism | 214 | ||
3. The Relativization of Supposed Objectivity and Neutrality | 216 | ||
IV. Implementing Culture-Based Comparative Law | 218 | ||
1. Reflections on Goals | 218 | ||
2. The Legal Understanding of Culture-Related Considerations | 219 | ||
3. Interdisciplinarity of Comparative Criminal Law | 220 | ||
4. Acceptance of Ambiguity | 221 | ||
5. Emphasis on Differences | 221 | ||
6. Particularities of Criminal Law | 222 | ||
7. Evaluation: Universalism or Relativism? | 224 | ||
V. Conclusions | 225 | ||
Bibliography | 225 | ||
Mordechai Kremnitzer and Khalid Ghanayim: On the Elements of the Offence of Homicide with Intention to Facilitate the Commission of Another Offence or Escape Justice, According to Section 301 A(a)(2) of the Israeli Penal Code (Amendment 137, 2019) | 231 | ||
I. Preface | 231 | ||
II. Background of Amendment 137 and the Various Approaches of the Case-Law, Academia and the Legislator | 232 | ||
1. Penal Code, 1977 (Prior to the Amendment) | 232 | ||
2. Private and Government Draft Bills | 237 | ||
III. Proposal of the Committee to Examine the Elements of Homicide Offences (2011) | 237 | ||
IV. Proposal of the Chairman of the Constitution, Law and Justice Committee of the Parliament – MK Nisan Slomiansky | 238 | ||
V. Proposal of Prof. Miriam Gur-Arye | 239 | ||
VI. Government Draft Bill (124) | 240 | ||
VII. Amendment 137 to the Penal Code (2019) | 241 | ||
VIII. Conclusion | 242 | ||
Bibliography | 243 | ||
Anat Meyassed Cnaan and Talia Eva Goldshtain: Legal Realism and Forensics: Why the Legal System Won't Go All the Way in Limiting Forensic Evidence to its Actual Capacity | 245 | ||
I. Introduction | 245 | ||
II. Disillusionment About the Absolute Reliability of Forensic Evidence | 246 | ||
Growing Public Interest in Forensics and Better Accessibility | 254 | ||
III. The Assessment of Forensic Evidence in Israel: The Committee on Prevention and Correction of Wrongful Convictions | 255 | ||
IV. The Admissibility of Forensic Methods | 259 | ||
V. Proposed Legal Realist Explanations | 264 | ||
1. Jurists and the ˋScientific' Appeal of Forensic Evidence | 267 | ||
2. Disqualifying Forensic Methods That Were Used in the Past | 268 | ||
3. Avoiding Conflict Between Institutions | 270 | ||
4. The Difficulty of Detaching from the Agenda of Streamlining Legal Procedure and the Weighting of Utilitarian Considerations | 271 | ||
VI. Closing Notes | 272 | ||
Bibliography | 274 | ||
Justin Monsenepwo: OHADA's Balancing Act Between the Community's Need for a Harmonized Criminal Law and the Member States' Hold on National Sovereignty | 277 | ||
I. Introduction | 277 | ||
1. Presentation of the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) | 278 | ||
2. OHADA's Balancing Act in the Creation of Criminal Law Provisions | 280 | ||
a) The Compromise in Article 5(2) of the OHADA Treaty | 280 | ||
b) Criminal Law Provisions Found in the Uniform Acts | 281 | ||
c) Shadows and Lights of the Solution Enshrined in Article 5(2) of the OHADA Treaty | 283 | ||
d) Tour d'horizon of the National Legislations Determining the Corresponding Criminal Sanctions | 286 | ||
3. OHADA's Balancing Act in the Jurisdiction of the CCJA in Criminal Commercial Matters | 287 | ||
II. Conclusion | 289 | ||
Bibliography | 289 | ||
Rottem Rosenberg Rubins: Eyewitness Identification in Israel: A Theoretical and Comparative Perspective | 293 | ||
I. Introduction | 293 | ||
II. Eyewitness Identification: Challenges and Recommendations | 295 | ||
III. Eyewitness Identification in Israel | 300 | ||
1. The High Evidentiary Weight of Eyewitness Identification | 300 | ||
2. Israeli Guidelines for Conducting Police Lineups and Their Deficiencies | 303 | ||
IV. Discussion: Ameliorating the Deficiencies in Israeli Eyewitness Identification Law on the Basis of the Danziger Committee's Recommendations | 310 | ||
Bibliography | 313 | ||
Yaniv Vaki: Condign Punishment Appropriate to the Extent of Proof | 317 | ||
I. Introduction | 317 | ||
II. The Traditional Model: Separation Between the Culpability and Punishment Stages | 318 | ||
III. Dependence Between the Culpability and Punishment Stages | 319 | ||
IV. Distinguishing Between Convictions Based on the Underlying Evidence | 324 | ||
V. The Proposed Model: Condign Punishment, Appropriate to the Strength of the Evidence | 328 | ||
Bibliography | 331 | ||
Brian Valerius: Legal Measures Against Hate Speech and Hate Crime | 335 | ||
I. Hate Speech and Hate Crime | 335 | ||
II. Hate Speech and Freedom of Expression | 337 | ||
1. Protection of Hate Speech by Freedom of Expression | 337 | ||
2. Protection of Freedom of Expression from Hate Speech | 338 | ||
III. Current Legal Measures Against Hate Speech and Hate Crime | 340 | ||
1. Criminal Offences | 340 | ||
2. Considering Hate Crime in Fixing Penalties | 342 | ||
3. Special Issues in the Prosecution of Hate Crimes | 343 | ||
4. Measures Beyond the Criminal Law | 343 | ||
IV. Legal Measures Against Hate Speech de lege ferenda | 344 | ||
1. New or Expanded Offences? | 344 | ||
2. Solution on the Legal Consequences Side? | 347 | ||
3. Procedural Solution? | 348 | ||
Bibliography | 349 | ||
Shizhou Wang: On the Characteristics of Joint Crime in Chinese Criminal Law | 351 | ||
I. Conceptual Characteristics of Joint Crime | 352 | ||
1. Characteristics in Term of Numbers | 352 | ||
2. Characteristics of Subjective Mental State | 354 | ||
II. Characteristics of the Theoretical Basis of Joint Crime | 357 | ||
1. Theoretical Characteristic of Antiquity | 357 | ||
2. Soviet Russian Influence | 362 | ||
3. Western Theories | 364 | ||
4. Chinese Experience | 366 | ||
III. Characteristics of the Conditions for the Constitution of Joint Crime | 368 | ||
1. Forms of Joint Crime and Their Constitutive Conditions | 368 | ||
2. Types of Co-Offender and the Conditions for Their Constitution | 372 | ||
a) Principal Offender | 373 | ||
b) Accomplice | 373 | ||
c) Coerced Accomplices | 374 | ||
d) Instigator | 375 | ||
3. Punishment Standards of Various Co-Offenders | 376 | ||
IV. Summary | 377 | ||
Bibliography | 379 | ||
John Zuluaga: Confronting the Past Through Criminal Courts | 381 | ||
I. Introduction | 381 | ||
II. The Procedural Forms of Colombias Transitional Justice System | 382 | ||
III. The Intersection Between Criminal Law and Transitional Justice | 384 | ||
IV. The Punitive Nature of Colombian Transitional Justice | 387 | ||
V. Colombian Transitional Justice: A Model for the Continuity of Criminal Justice Problems? | 388 | ||
VI. What Can Be Expected from Criminal Procedure in Times of Political Transition? | 389 | ||
VII. Conclusion | 390 | ||
Bibliography | 391 | ||
III. Corporate Law and Financial Regulation | 395 | ||
Winfried Bausback: Future Whistleblower Protection in Germany Caught Between the Conflicting Demands of Bureaucratic Burden and Law Enforcement | 397 | ||
I. Introduction: Whistleblower Protection as a Subject of EU and German Legislation | 398 | ||
II. Contents of the EU Whistleblower Directive | 399 | ||
1. Scope of Application | 399 | ||
2. Establishment of “Whistleblower Systems” – Internal and External Reporting Systems | 400 | ||
3. Protection Against Reprisals | 402 | ||
4. Consequences of the Failure to Transpose the Directive within the Time Limit for the German Jurisdiction | 402 | ||
III. Current Draft Bills in German Whistleblower Protection Law – Which Exceed EU Implementation Requirements | 403 | ||
1. Draft Bill of the Federal Government in the Version of the Resolution of the German Bundestag in 2nd and 3rd Reading on 16 December 2022 | 403 | ||
a) Scope of Application | 403 | ||
b) Establishment of Internal and External Whistleblowing Systems | 405 | ||
c) Prohibition on Reprisal | 406 | ||
2. Split Draft Bills of the Government Coalition Partners for a Whistleblower Protection Law as well as for Supplementary Rules on Whistleblower Protection Involving the Additional Requirement of the Availability of Anonymous Reporting Channels | 407 | ||
IV. Exceeding the Goal? Whistleblower Protection in the EU and Germany, Examined in the Light of Freedom and the Rule of Law | 409 | ||
V. Concluding Assessment | 412 | ||
Bibliography | 413 | ||
Orit Fischman Afori: The Evolving Concept of Minority Shareholders as Controllers – The Israeli Perspective | 415 | ||
I. Introduction | 415 | ||
II. Minority Shareholders as Controllers in Israeli Corporate Law | 416 | ||
III. The Duty of Fairness and the Haama v. Muller Case | 419 | ||
IV. The Delaware Model | 420 | ||
V. Concluding Remarks | 423 | ||
Bibliography | 423 | ||
Asaf Eckstein and Gideon Parchomovsky: Rethinking Oversight Duties and Responsibilities in Conglomerates | 425 | ||
I. Introduction | 425 | ||
II. Conglomerates | 426 | ||
1. A Parent's Liability for a Subsidiary's Misdeeds | 428 | ||
2. The Duty of Oversight | 434 | ||
3. Rethinking Oversight Duties and Responsibilities in Conglomerates | 438 | ||
III. Conclusion | 440 | ||
Bibliography | 441 | ||
Assaf Hamdani and Sharon Hannes: Institutional Investor Activism: Lessons from Israel | 445 | ||
I. Introduction | 445 | ||
II. Institutional Investors' Activism and Director Appointments | 447 | ||
III. Israel: Capital Markets in Transition | 450 | ||
1. Institutional Investors and Controlled Companies | 450 | ||
2. The Unique Case of Israel as a Market in Transition | 452 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 462 | ||
Bibliography | 462 | ||
Tamir Shanan: Taxation of “Stateless” Individual Taxpayers in the 21st Century | 469 | ||
I. Introduction | 469 | ||
1. The Origins of International Tax Regimes – Reliance on an Outdated Concept, Which Poses Difficulties in Taxing Individual Taxpayers in the Digital Age as Cross-Border Human Capital Mobility Increases | 471 | ||
2. The Magnitude and Economic Impact of Cross-Boarder Migrants | 473 | ||
3. Residency Determination for Tax Purposes | 475 | ||
a) Residency Determination under Domestic Tax Systems | 476 | ||
b) Residency Determination under Bilateral Tax Treaties | 478 | ||
c) Non-Dom Regimes and the Bhagwati Proposal | 479 | ||
4. The Israeli Case | 481 | ||
II. Concluding Remarks | 484 | ||
Bibliography | 485 | ||
Iris Soroker: Regulation of Franchise Termination | 489 | ||
I. Introduction | 489 | ||
II. The Blum Case | 490 | ||
III. The Legal Novelty | 497 | ||
IV. About Blum and Zohar and Everything in Between | 500 | ||
V. Franchise Termination: Economic Analysis | 501 | ||
VI. Regulation on Termination of a Franchise Relationship | 505 | ||
VII. Conclusion | 511 | ||
Bibliography | 512 | ||
IV. Legal Challenges in Digital Transformation and Technology | 515 | ||
Berthold Haustein: Through the Thicket of Law to the Stars of Technology Transfer | 517 | ||
I. Introduction | 517 | ||
II. The Legal Framework for Technology Transfer in Germany | 520 | ||
1. Higher Education Law and Constitutional Law | 520 | ||
2. Budgetary Law | 524 | ||
3. Excursus: Expert Valuation of Property Rights/IP Rights | 525 | ||
4. Law on State Aid | 527 | ||
a) No Aid – Market Remuneration | 527 | ||
b) Aid – Eligibility Criteria for Technology Transfer Aid | 529 | ||
5. Interim Result | 530 | ||
III. Conclusion | 530 | ||
Bibliography | 531 | ||
Eric Hilgendorf: “The High Dignity of the Office of Judge” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence | 533 | ||
I. Introduction: Digitization of Legal Decisions? | 533 | ||
II. Core Elements of the Work of Judges | 536 | ||
1. Decisions of Legal Issues | 537 | ||
2. Legal Peace and Acceptance | 538 | ||
3. Artificial Intelligence as Support | 539 | ||
III. AI Use to Compensate for Human Weaknesses | 540 | ||
IV. Competency-Enhancing Uses of AI | 542 | ||
1. Database Analysis | 542 | ||
2. Prognoses | 542 | ||
3. Writing Text | 543 | ||
4. Evaluation of Evidence | 544 | ||
5. Communication | 545 | ||
6. Virtual Space with Virtual Agents | 546 | ||
7. Final Decision-Making by AI? | 546 | ||
V. Problems in the Use of AI in the Judiciary | 547 | ||
1. General Problems | 547 | ||
2. Specific Legal Challenges | 549 | ||
VI. Summary and Outlook | 551 | ||
Bibliography | 551 | ||
Carsten Kusche: Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy | 555 | ||
I. Problem Outline | 555 | ||
II. Softening the Distinction between Perpetration and Participation | 557 | ||
III. Participation after Completion of the Offence? Perpetuation of Violations of Legal Interests as a Characteristic of Platform Crime | 557 | ||
IV. Provider Liability in Particular | 558 | ||
1. Almost No Direct Liability under Current Law | 559 | ||
2. The Structural Dangers of Modern Online Platforms? | 560 | ||
3. Systemic Aggravation of Liability in the Digital Services Act | 561 | ||
4. Tort- and Platform-Specific Differentiation of the Duty Model? | 562 | ||
a) Abandonment of Blanket Indemnity? | 562 | ||
b) Moderate Tightening of Liability | 563 | ||
5. Supervisor Responsibility? | 566 | ||
a) Imbalance of Advantage and Responsibility | 566 | ||
b) Breach of Duty of the Company Organisation as a Connecting Factor | 566 | ||
c) Inappropriateness of the Instruments of the General Part in the Case of Negligence | 566 | ||
d) Fit of the Principles of Press Criminal Law and (Largely) Independent Liability for Organisational Deficiencies? | 567 | ||
Bibliography | 568 | ||
David Roth-Isigkeit: Towards Methodological Experimentalism in Digital Transformation Research | 571 | ||
I. The Dynamics of Digital Transformation | 571 | ||
1. Digital Transformation | 571 | ||
2. Technological Transformation as an Acceleration Process | 574 | ||
3. Dynamics, Trans-Nationalisation and Uncontrollability: Reasons for the Loss of Social Control | 575 | ||
II. Methodological Challenges | 577 | ||
1. The Time Factor: The Necessity of a Procedural Approach | 578 | ||
2. Clarification and Consolidation of Disciplinary Perspectives from the Natural and Social Sciences | 578 | ||
3. Legislation on Technology | 579 | ||
III. The Agenda of an Interdisciplinary Approach | 580 | ||
1. Towards a Proactive Technology Policy | 580 | ||
2. Democratisation of Technological Advancements | 581 | ||
3. A Global Approach | 581 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 582 | ||
Bibliography | 582 | ||
Paul Vogel: The Sanctions Regime in EU Data Protection Law | 585 | ||
I. Introduction | 585 | ||
II. The Sanctions Regimes in German and EU Data Protection Law | 586 | ||
1. Addressees of Data Protection Law | 586 | ||
2. Administrative Fines under GDPR | 588 | ||
a) Fining Criteria | 589 | ||
b) Fines under Art. 83(4)–(6) GDPR | 592 | ||
c) Interim Conclusion | 593 | ||
III. Effectiveness of the Sanctions Regime as a Means of Protection of Individual Rights | 594 | ||
1. Sanctions Deficits in Data Protection Law | 594 | ||
2. Enforcement of Sanctions by Data Protection Supervisory Authorities | 596 | ||
a) The System of Supervisory Authorities | 596 | ||
b) Guidelines of the Article 29 Working Party | 597 | ||
c) Practice of Imposing Fines under GDPR in Germany and Other Member States | 598 | ||
d) Guidelines Used by the Supervisory Authorities to Calculate Fines | 599 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 603 | ||
Bibliography | 605 | ||
Bernd Weiß: Digitalisation and the Right to the Lawful Judge – Human Being or “Automated Judging Machine”? | 607 | ||
I. Problem Definition and Problem Awareness | 607 | ||
II. Automated Judges According to Axel Adrian | 608 | ||
III. Where Will the Disruption Take Place? | 611 | ||
IV. Interim Result: The Automated Judge is Possible – in One Way or Another | 615 | ||
V. How “Resilient” is the “Traditional Statutory Judge”? | 616 | ||
VI. The Challenge | 626 | ||
Bibliography | 631 | ||
V. Ethics, Health, and Law | 633 | ||
Frauke Rostalski: Life and Death | 635 | ||
I. Introduction | 635 | ||
II. Increasing Relativisation of the Protection of Life? | 635 | ||
III. Beginning and End of Human Life | 637 | ||
IV. Unborn Life | 643 | ||
1. Protection of Life and Maternal Surrogacy | 643 | ||
2. Protection of Life and Termination of Pregnancy | 645 | ||
V. The Decision Against One's Own (Continued) Life | 649 | ||
VI. Conclusion | 656 | ||
Bibliography | 656 | ||
María Lucila Tuñón Corti: Age, Fair Innings, and Triage in the Time of Coronavirus | 665 | ||
I. Introduction | 665 | ||
II. Triage Decision in a Pandemic According to German Criminal Law | 668 | ||
III. Justifying Age-Based Criteria for Triage Decisions | 670 | ||
1. ˋIndirect' Age-Based Criteria | 671 | ||
2. ˋPure' Age-Based Criteria | 672 | ||
a) Consequentialist Approaches | 673 | ||
b) Deontological Approach and Fair-Innings | 675 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 679 | ||
Bibliography | 679 | ||
List of Publications by Yoram Danziger | 685 | ||
I. Books | 685 | ||
II. Articles | 685 | ||
III. Reports, Position Papers, and other Publications | 686 | ||
List of Authors | 689 |
Chapters
Jewish Lawyers in Germany – an Asset for the Liberal Constitutional State
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 9–13
Reparations for Holocaust Survivors – Searching for Justice in Israel and Germany
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 21–40
New Typologies of Non-International Armed Conflict?
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 41–66
Justice Danziger’s Judgment on the Boycott Law
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 67–82
Is Islamic Shariah Law Applicable under German Constitutional Law?
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 83–101
Large-Scale Disasters in Germany and Israel
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 103–114
The Role of the State Comptroller of Israel in Combating Government Corruption and Promoting Moral Integrity
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 115–131
Erosion of the Rule of Law: Curtailing the Powers of Constitutional Courts
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 133–144
How the Law Deals with Troublemakers
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 145–161
Probabilism in Legal Interpretation
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 163–185
Restoring Stolen Dignity
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 187–204
Criminal Law in Intercultural Dialogue
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 207–230
On the Elements of the Offence of Homicide with Intention to Facilitate the Commission of Another Offence or Escape Justice, According to Section 301 A(a)(2) of the Israeli Penal Code (Amendment 137, 2019)
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 231–244
Legal Realism and Forensics: Why the Legal System Won’t Go All the Way in Limiting Forensic Evidence to its Actual Capacity
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 245–275
OHADA’s Balancing Act Between the Community’s Need for a Harmonized Criminal Law and the Member States’ Hold on National Sovereignty
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 277–291
Eyewitness Identification in Israel: A Theoretical and Comparative Perspective
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 293–316
Condign Punishment Appropriate to the Extent of Proof
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 317–334
Legal Measures Against Hate Speech and Hate Crime
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 335–350
On the Characteristics of Joint Crime in Chinese Criminal Law
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 351–380
Confronting the Past Through Criminal Courts
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 381–393
Future Whistleblower Protection in Germany Caught Between the Conflicting Demands of Bureaucratic Burden and Law Enforcement
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 397–413
The Evolving Concept of Minority Shareholders as Controllers – The Israeli Perspective
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 415–424
Rethinking Oversight Duties and Responsibilities in Conglomerates
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 425–443
Institutional Investor Activism: Lessons from Israel
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 445–468
Taxation of “Stateless” Individual Taxpayers in the 21st Century
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 469–487
Regulation of Franchise Termination
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 489–513
Through the Thicket of Law to the Stars of Technology Transfer
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 517–532
“The High Dignity of the Office of Judge” in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 533–554
Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 555–569
Towards Methodological Experimentalism in Digital Transformation Research
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 571–583
The Sanctions Regime in EU Data Protection Law
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 585–606
Digitalisation and the Right to the Lawful Judge – Human Being or “Automated Judging Machine”?
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 607–631
Age, Fair Innings, and Triage in the Time of Coronavirus
In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 665–683