Menu Expand

Cite BOOK Chapter

Style

Kusche, C. (2024). 'Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy' In E. Hilgendorf, (Ed.), Law in Times of Crisis (1st ed., pp. 555-569)
Kusche, Carsten. "Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy". Law in Times of Crisis, edited by Eric Hilgendorf, Duncker & Humblot, 2024, pp. 555-569.
Kusche, C. (2024): 'Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy', in Hilgendorf, E (ed.). Law in Times of Crisis. Duncker & Humblot, pp. 555-569.

Format

Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy

Kusche, Carsten

In: Law in Times of Crisis (2024), pp. 555–569

Additional Information

Chapter Details

Pricing

Author Details

Carsten Kusche

Kusche, Carsten, Prof. Dr., Faculty of Law, University of Mannheim, Germany

References

  1. Achenbach, Hans/Ransiek, Andreas/Rönnau, Thomas (eds.): Handbuch Wirtschaftsstrafrecht, 5th edition, Heidelberg 2019.  Google Scholar
  2. Bülte, Jens: Vorgesetztenverantwortlichkeit im Strafrecht, Baden-Baden 2015.  Google Scholar
  3. Ceffinato, Tobias: Die strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Internetplattformbetreibern, JuS 2017, pp. 403–408.  Google Scholar
  4. Erb, Volker/Schäfer, Jürgen (eds.): Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Bd. 1: §§ 1–37, 4th edition, Munich 2020.  Google Scholar
  5. Erb, Volker/Schäfer, Jürgen (eds.): Münchener Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Bd. 7 (future Bd. 8) Nebenstrafrecht II, 3rd edition, Munich 2019.  Google Scholar
  6. Greco, Luis: Strafbarkeit des Unterhaltens einer Handels- und Diskussionsplattform insbesondere im sog. Darknet, ZIS 2019, pp. 435–450.  Google Scholar
  7. Heintschel-Heinegg, Bernd von (ed.): Beck’scher Online-Kommentar StGB, 56th edition, Munich 2023.  Google Scholar
  8. Hilgendorf, Eric/Kusche, Carsten/Valerius, Brian: Computer- und Internetstrafrecht, 3rd edition, Berlin 2023.  Google Scholar
  9. Hoven, Elisa: Zur Strafbarkeit von Fake News – de lege lata und de lege ferenda, ZStW 129, 2017, pp. 718–744.  Google Scholar
  10. Hoven, Elisa/Witting, Alexandra: Das Beleidigungsunrecht im digitalen Zeitalter, NJW 2021, pp. 2397–2401.  Google Scholar
  11. Kindhäuser, Urs/Neumann, Ulfrid/Paeffgen, Hans-Ullrich (eds.): Strafgesetzbuch, Bd. 1: §§ 1–79b, 5th edition, Baden-Baden 2017.  Google Scholar
  12. Krischker, Sven: “Gefällt mir”, “Geteilt”, “Beleidigt”? – Die Internetbeleidigung in sozialen Netzwerken, JA 2013, pp. 488–493.  Google Scholar
  13. Kühl, Kristian: § 20 LPG Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit. Presse-Inhaltsdelikte, in: Sedelmeier, Klaus/Burkhardt, Emanuel H. (eds.), Presserecht, 6th edition, Munich 2015.  Google Scholar
  14. Reinbacher, Tobias: Die “Weiterverbreitung” von Hate Speech in sozialen Medien – Fragen der Beteiligung an einer gemäß § 185 StGB strafbaren Beleidigung, JZ 2020, pp. 558–563.  Google Scholar
  15. Sängerlaub, Alexander/Meier, Miriam/Rühl, Wolf-Dieter: Fakten statt Fakes, Berlin 2018.  Google Scholar
  16. Schönke, Adolf/Schröder, Horst: Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar, 30th edition, Munich 2019.  Google Scholar
  17. Schünemann, Bernd: Gefährden Fake News die Demokratie, wächst aber im Strafrecht das Rettende auch?, GA 2019, pp. 620–640.  Google Scholar
  18. Steinebach, Martin/Bader, Katharina/Rinsdorf, Lars/Krämer, Nicole/Roßnagel, Alexander (eds.): Desinformation aufdecken und bekämpfen, Baden-Baden 2020.  Google Scholar
  19. Valerius, Brian: Wahlstrafrecht und soziale Medien, Festschrift für Urs Kindhäuser, Baden-Baden 2019, pp. 827–840.  Google Scholar
  20. Zieschang, Frank: Zur strafrechtlichen Verantwortlichkeit eines Host-Providers für rechtswidrige Inhalte, GA 2020, pp. 57–69.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Carsten Kusche: Platform Crime as a Challenge for Criminal Law Doctrine and (Criminal) Law Policy 555
I. Problem Outline 555
II. Softening the Distinction between Perpetration and Participation 557
III. Participation after Completion of the Offence? Perpetuation of Violations of Legal Interests as a Characteristic of Platform Crime 557
IV. Provider Liability in Particular 558
1. Almost No Direct Liability under Current Law 559
2. The Structural Dangers of Modern Online Platforms? 560
3. Systemic Aggravation of Liability in the Digital Services Act 561
4. Tort- and Platform-Specific Differentiation of the Duty Model? 562
a) Abandonment of Blanket Indemnity? 562
b) Moderate Tightening of Liability 563
5. Supervisor Responsibility? 566
a) Imbalance of Advantage and Responsibility 566
b) Breach of Duty of the Company Organisation as a Connecting Factor 566
c) Inappropriateness of the Instruments of the General Part in the Case of Negligence 566
d) Fit of the Principles of Press Criminal Law and (Largely) Independent Liability for Organisational Deficiencies? 567
Bibliography 568